What did Mr. Lu Xun mean when he called Liang Shiqiu "a lackey of a heartless capitalist"?

Feng Naichao is a left-wing literary theorist. Participated in 1930 the establishment of the Chinese Left-wing Writers' Union and was elected as the drafter of the theoretical program. Feng Naichao, like Lu Xun, is a literature class for Liang Shiqiu?

1February, 930, he published The Art of Class Society in the second issue of Pioneers edited by Jiang Guangci and others, refuting some of Liang Shiqiu's views, which said: "Since the proletariat realized the existence of its own class from its own struggle experience, it further realized its historical mission. However, Liang Shiqiu came to preach ... For such a preacher, we should give the title of' capitalist running dog'. "

Feng Naichao stands on the side of the general public and has a natural moral commanding height. The hat given to Liang Shiqiu has not been theoretically reasoned and demonstrated. Therefore, Liang Shiqiu is a "capitalist's running dog", which is just a quick remark and a pure moral judgment. This definition has not been firmly established in fact and logic.

Extended data:

Lu Xun added two attributes:

This is the famous works "The Lost Family" and "The Weaknesses of Capitalists" in the modern literary debate, and the debate turned back to Lvliang from Liang Shiqiu and Feng Naichao. Lu Xun added two new attributes "losing home" and "weakness" to Liang Shiqiu's original title.

Lu Xun could not prove that Liang Shiqiu belonged to the "bourgeoisie" according to the definition, so he ignored Liang Shiqiu's self-defense. He just swore at Liang Shiqiu: "All running dogs, although domesticated by a capitalist, actually belong to all capitalists, so they are docile when they meet all rich people and bark when they meet all poor people.

I don't know who its owner is, which is the reason why it meets all rich people docile, that is, the evidence that it belongs to all capitalists. Even if no one became hungry and became a wild dog, he still met all the meek rich people and barked at all the poor people, but at this time he didn't understand who was the master. "

"Now that Mr. Liang has described how hard he works, he seems to be the' proletariat' (that is, Mr. Liang's so-called' loser'). He doesn't know who his master is and belongs to the latter category. For the sake of accuracy, he has to add a few words, called' lost family' and' capitalist lackeys'. "

In Lu Xun's view, since Liang Shiqiu doesn't even know who his master is, what is it that he doesn't lose his family? At this point, the ideological differences and conflicts of literary and artistic thoughts have taken second place, while the emotional dispute has prevailed. The dispute between Lu and Liang reached its climax in the ridicule of Lu Xun's moral commanding heights.

Public trust. The Debate between Lu Xun and Liang Shiqiu about "Desperate Servant of Capitalists"