Debate skills and common words

Practical debating skills and common expressions

Effective attack in free debate should reflect the order of attack, that is, we can see the sequence of taking turns to go into battle, which is basically to grasp the initiative on the field and be in the active position of controlling the scene. The following are the practical debating skills and common expressions I collected for you. Welcome to read!

Debate and questioning skills-there is a trick in martial arts novels called "fighting with soldiers", which means that people with deep internal forces can fight back with each other's attack. This method is also suitable for argument. Fang Zhengzhi was able to treat himself with examples of opposing sides because he had a series of theories that were not expressed orally and reinterpreted words as a strong backing.

Second, replacing the defective part of the other party's argument with our favorable views or materials can often receive the miraculous effect of "four or two". We call this technique "grafting" The technique of replacing wood with flowers is a storm in the debate, which requires the debater to take over and fight back bravely, so it is also a kind of difficulty and high antagonism. Persuasive argument skills. It is true that the eloquence of the scene is changeable, and more "substitute flowers" need the debater to accurately summarize or deduce the other party's views and our position at that time.

On the surface, agree with the other party's point of view and deduce it according to the other party's logic, and set some reasonable obstacles in the derivation according to your own needs, so that the other party's point of view cannot be established under additional conditions or completely opposite conclusions can be drawn.

The so-called thorough cleaning: figuratively speaking, it is to point out that the other party's argument is not closely related to or runs counter to the topic, fundamentally correct the foothold of the other party's argument, and bring it into our "sphere of influence" to make it just serve our point of view. Compared with the method of "pushing the boat with the current" of forward reasoning, this technique is just the opposite of its thinking.

Selective questioning is one of the offensive means used by many debaters. Usually this kind of problem is premeditated, which will make people fall into a "dilemma". No matter which choice the other party makes, it is not good for them. A specific skill to deal with this kind of problem is to extract a preset option from the other party's selective question for a powerful backchat, which will fundamentally frustrate the other party's spirit. This skill is to grasp the root cause of the problem. Of course, the actual situation in the debate is very complicated. Mastering some anti-customer skills in the debate is only one factor. On the other hand, it is necessary to improvise, but there is no rule to follow.

In debates, it often happens that the two sides are entangled in trivial issues, examples or expressions. As a result, it seemed that the debate was lively, but actually it deviated from the topic of Wan Li. This is a taboo in argument. An important skill is to quickly identify the key issue in the other party's argument after the first and second arguments, seize this issue and attack it to the end, so as to completely defeat the other party in theory. Like what? Is food and clothing a necessary condition for talking about morality? The key to this debate lies in whether we can talk about morality in the case of insufficient food and clothing. Only by always grasping this key problem can we give each other a fatal blow. What do people often have in the debate? Avoid reality and be empty? It is necessary to use this technology occasionally. For example, the other party asks a question that we can't answer. If we force an answer without knowing it, we will not only lose points, but even make a joke. In this case, we should tactfully avoid each other's problems and look for other weaknesses to attack. However, what do we need more often? Avoid virtual reality? Focus from light? That is, he is good at playing hardball on basic and key issues. If the other party asks questions, we will immediately avoid them, which will leave a bad impression on the judges and the audience and think that we dare not face up to each other's questions. In addition, if the attack on the basic arguments and concepts put forward by the other party fails, it is also a loss of points. Being good at grasping the opponent's key points and winning by attacking is an important skill in the debate.

7. Taking advantage of contradictions Because the two sides of the debate are composed of four players, four players often have contradictions in the debate process, even if the same player speaks quickly in the free debate, it may also have contradictions. Once this happens, we should seize it immediately and try our best to expand each other's contradictions so that they can't take care of themselves and attack us. For example, in the debate with the Cambridge team, the Cambridge team's three arguments hold that law is not moral, but law is basic morality. These two views are obviously contradictory. We took the opportunity to widen the gap between the two debaters of the other side and put the other side in a dilemma. What if the other party argued from the beginning? Food and clothing? As the basic state of human existence, and then talk under our fierce offensive? Hungry and cold? State, which is contradictory to the previous opinion. Our side? Attack the shield with the spear of the child? Let the other side be speechless in desperation.

Eight? Draw a snake out of the hole? In debates, there is often a deadlock. When the other party insists on his own argument, no matter how we attack the other party, if we still adopt the method of frontal attack, the effect is not great. In this case, we should adjust the means of attack as soon as possible.

Take a circuitous way to induce the other side to leave the position on seemingly insignificant issues, thus hitting the other side and causing a sensation in the hearts of the judges and the audience.

Nine? Li is stiff? When we encounter some arguments that are difficult to demonstrate logically or theoretically, we have to use it? Li is stiff? This method introduces new concepts to solve the difficulties. ? Li is stiff? The significance of this tactic is to introduce a new concept to deal with the other side, so as to ensure that some key concepts in our argument are hidden behind and not directly attacked by the other side. Debate is a very flexible process, in which some important skills can be used. Experience tells us that only by combining knowledge accumulation with debate skills can we achieve better results in debate.

In daily life, we can see the following situations. When the fire brigade receives a call for help, it often answers it in a slow tone. This is to stabilize the speaker's mood so that the other party can correctly explain the situation.

Nine problems to be paid attention to in the competition 1. A debater must be familiar with the rules of debate.

2. Strive for innovation in self-presentation and show the integrity of the team.

3. Link mining. Such as the arrangement of the remaining time.

4. Argument arrangement: An argument strives for stability and powerful language. Have a good grasp of the whole debate. Second, the three arguments require improvisation, timely language organization and a strong grasp of views; The four debates are the people who draw a successful conclusion to the whole debate. It needs thinking, height and enthusiasm, and can drive the judges and the audience emotionally. Listen to each other's flaws first, and talk nonsense in the conclusion. Second, make up for our mistakes. Third, we should observe the face on the spot. Fourth, there must be a wonderful ending to impress the judges.

5, take off the manuscript, only the language at the time of taking off the manuscript is infectious, go with the flow and follow your feelings. (Attachment: General usage of notes prepared for debate: record cases cited for a long time; < 3 > record reference data) is fully prepared.

6. Pay attention to the overall cooperation on the field: (Winning or losing in the debate is not just a personal performance. It is also a test of the tacit understanding of debaters. )

7. Debate skills

1), pay attention to the use of body language: there is no absolute right or wrong in debate. See whose language is more convincing. Appropriate and rich body language can increase your persuasiveness.

2) The use of classical expressions in the free debate stage: The free debate stage is the climax of the whole debate. Each debater's language is short and pithy, with strong pertinence. But the time for the audience and the judges is also relatively reduced. For example, the opponent's debater obviously digressed. Why did the other debater deliberately avoid our question? Have you agreed with us? Classic common words are often used when they are important.

3) Avoid the tips on the team's infield, because this is a negative tip, and the tip means that you deny him.

4) pay attention to the key points and grasp the content: after all, debate is not a performance. It depends on whether your language is persuasive, not how powerful you are.

5), avoid harm (1, formal harm, including overtime, continuous speech during free debate, etc. ; 2, the point of view is hard, we must avoid absolutization. 3. Pay attention to manners: Debate is not a quarrel. You must pay attention to emotional control and your manners. No personal attacks. 4. Pay attention to the rules (especially for beginners). )

8. The content should be broken. Establish a space to highlight your own advantages. Have your own routine, close to the debate.

9. Offensive and defensive skills.

1), innovation. What's new and what's new can't be logically new, because seeking novelty should not only give the audience a bright feeling, but also make it easy for the audience to accept. The novelty of logic is not easy to accept in a short time.

2) For the questions thrown by opponents, you can pass the buck, and there is no need to answer with an absolute answer.

3) Any idea is useful to both sides, depending on how you use it.

4), grasp each other's loopholes to grasp accurately! You can't guess each other subjectively.