Primary and secondary school teachers may apply for retirement after 30 years of teaching experience! What do you think of this?

Primary and secondary school teachers may apply for retirement after 30 years of teaching experience! If this policy can be implemented, I think it will be the most humanized reform of compulsory education.

Take our school as an example. In the past two years, 1998 and 1999, the substitute teachers in our school have been cleared out of the teaching team, and then the unassigned normal students have been assigned. Since then, the main course teachers in our school have been basically equipped, but the teachers of music, sports, beauty and other majors have been vacant, and the main course teachers are acting as agents. However, in the long twenty years, there are few new people in our school. It is said that the reason is that teachers are not short of manpower according to the number of students. But at this rate, if we middle-aged people are old and don't enter new classes, it is estimated that students will face a group of old teachers every day, and more students will be tired of learning. Therefore, the introduction of the 30-year retirement policy is indeed conducive to the development of education.

Imagine, if primary and secondary school teachers can apply for retirement after 30 years of teaching experience, who will choose to retire early?

At present, under the title quota system, it is doomed that more than 90% of the old teachers cannot be promoted to senior titles even when they reach retirement age, and the scores in title evaluation are far behind those of teachers with more qualifications and certificates every year. In addition, teachers have unequal opportunities to meet the requirements of professional title evaluation. All this helplessness has prompted some teachers to stay away from their professional titles and just want to retire healthily. Therefore, if early retirement is not too bad, I believe they will be the first to choose early retirement, and those teachers with senior titles will not be willing to leave even if they are overwhelmed by the rich salary when they are in office.

If there is no hope of being promoted to a senior professional title for life, it is doomed that rural teachers can't afford a nanny. In this way, instead of hiring a nanny, it is better to retire early, get a pension and take care of your family.

Some old teachers are responsible all their lives and will not be lazy. When you are old and tired, you have to take medicine to be hospitalized if you are angry and anxious in class. So it's better to stay away from work and take care of your health.

If this policy can really be realized, it will really be a big plus for teachers. It can also increase the gold content of the profession of teachers.

The United States has a retirement age policy, that is, when your retirement age+length of service equals 80, you can choose to retire. Working at the age of 20, working for 30 years, and retiring at the age of 50 is very good. You know, at present, the standard retirement age in the United States is 66, and it will be extended to 67 in the future.

At present, teachers can choose to retire independently, and they are women with professional and technical titles above deputy senior level. According to the national policy, their retirement age has been delayed to 60, but they can still retire at the age of 55 they applied for.

To tell the truth, after the age of 50, primary and secondary school teachers began to fall behind. It's really tiring to have three or four classes a day and correct homework. In addition, education is gradually moving towards electronization, networking and informationization. Many old teachers can't keep up, and many teaching and work are organized by young teachers. Although the knowledge structure of teaching has not changed after 50, there will be a generation gap between communication methods and children. Conditional old teachers will be transferred to management positions or provide logistics services for the elderly.

Retirement after 30 years of service may be really possible in the future. However, we will further tighten the requirements for teachers' academic qualifications, such as raising teachers' academic qualifications to graduate degrees. In this way, even if they enter the job and have reached the age of 25, they will reach 55 after 30 years of service. Maybe it can be realized at that time.

The problem of voluntary retirement in primary and secondary schools after 30 years seems to be in line with the policy of extending the retirement period, but it is actually based on the current structure and the actual needs of school teachers. Considering the employment situation of normal college students and the physical and mental condition of teachers with high professional titles, they can also apply for retirement on a voluntary basis. Extending retirement also depends on the physical condition of teachers. If the teacher is ill, you can't force an extension. Therefore, the policies formulated are dead, but they can be implemented flexibly. The basic policies are consistent. In case of special circumstances, it is better to implement humanization according to the principle of voluntariness.

Primary and secondary school teachers have been teaching for 30 years and are expected to apply for retirement on their own. This is a good idea, which gives teachers full freedom to choose retirement time and makes them feel a little warm.

However, if you hadn't retired, you had your own plans. You need to fully weigh the pros and cons and choose carefully. This decision is not good. First, in terms of age, 18 years old works, and if he has been teaching for 30 years, he will be about 50 years old. Male teachers are in their prime, and female teachers can last for a few more years. I'm really reluctant to retire. Second, from the perspective of professional titles, most teachers in this age group have not been promoted to senior professional titles, and some are facing promotion and retirement. Third, from the perspective of income, without senior professional titles, wages will not go up. Even if you get a senior title, your salary will increase year by year, and the further you go, the higher your salary will be. So now is the golden season of spring planting, summer management and autumn harvest, and it is even more reluctant to retire at this time. Therefore, it can be considered that it is almost impossible for teachers to apply for retirement before the legal retirement age, except in very special circumstances. This idea has become a closed door, a castle in the air.

The above is from the teacher's personal point of view, and then from the perspective of the school and the whole education, teachers' early retirement also has many disadvantages. First, teachers who have been teaching for more than 30 years are in a period of rich teaching experience, skillful teaching methods and steady improvement of teaching effect. At this time, it is not only a great waste for teachers, but also a great loss for school teaching. Secondly, it makes the teaching management of the school more difficult. Due to the uneven age of teachers, one applied for retirement last semester and the other applied for retirement next semester. I don't know which one will apply for retirement next year. The randomness and uncertainty of teachers' retirement will always cause troubles to the school's work planning, teaching convergence and management order. Third, from the overall situation of education, teachers applying for retirement anytime and anywhere will inevitably bring pressure to the competent authorities, making it difficult to foresee and control the deployment management of teachers, falling into the dispute between teachers' retirement and non-retirement, and frequently mobilizing and deploying, which will affect the normal educational order and overall stability.

To sum up, primary and secondary school teachers can choose to apply for retirement after 30 years of teaching experience, which is harmful and useless. At present, there is a shortage of high-quality teachers, which is not feasible.

For this "possible" policy, the author warmly cheers and hopes that it will be introduced as soon as possible!

I have been teaching for 30 years, and I have been teaching for life, and I have devoted my youth and blood to education. If at this time, teachers who can choose by themselves, who are in poor health or want to enjoy retirement early, can leave the podium a few years earlier and live another life. Such a policy is humanized and certainly deserves cheering.

However, so far, we have not seen such a policy in a province, let alone at the national level. I don't know where the subject got such information. I hope this is not a fantasy or an ideal, but a policy being formulated.

Teachers' work is very complicated, which is different from other types of work. Things are not as simple as some people think. The teacher is facing a group of fresh children, each child has his own personality, and the teacher must deal with each child well.

With the growth of age, the age gap between teachers and students is getting bigger and bigger. Separated by the age gap of several generations, their ideas are often very different. What teachers think is right is often abandoned by students, while what students like is sneered at by teachers!

Perhaps, teachers in their fifties don't think they are old or have changed a lot, but in the eyes of students, they are already old monsters and witches. This difference also determines that people of this age group are not suitable for teaching.

We don't rule out that some teachers, no matter how old they are, can get along with students, and the relationship between teachers and students is not affected by age. However, this is something that only a few people can do, and most people can't.

What's more, teachers in their fifties have worked for many years and many of them are in poor health. Their eyesight and hearing can't adapt to the teaching work and their energy can't keep up. Applying for retirement is the right choice for both teachers and students.

Unfortunately, I am also worried that this policy may be difficult to introduce, because from the policy information at the national level, the general trend is to postpone retirement rather than retire early. This is the general trend, and I am afraid it is difficult to introduce policies against this trend. This is the time for us to cheer and be mentally prepared!

Regarding early retirement, civil servants have been mentioned the most recently. At the end of last year, the National People's Congress promulgated a new civil servant law, which is scheduled to be implemented on June 1 day this year. The new civil service law clearly states that civil servants who have served for 30 years or 20 years and are less than 5 years away from retirement are allowed to retire early upon their own application and with the consent of the appointment and removal organ. In other words, as long as civil servants meet the requirements, they can apply to the unit or organization for research, and after approval, they can retire early, not if you want to. Many people interpret this as that civil servants can automatically retire early after 30 years of service, which is inaccurate.

After the implementation of the new civil service law, civil servants have the opportunity to apply for early retirement, but they have not defined the personnel of public institutions. Documents that have been implemented for many years, including the Regulations on Personnel Management of Public Institutions, have not mentioned the issue of early retirement of public institutions before. Therefore, from the policy point of view, it is unreasonable for institutions to retire early. In the next step, it is not known whether the state will issue specific implementation rules for the personnel of public institutions according to the new civil service law, and clarify the matters of early retirement. But what is certain is that the state will pay more and more attention to the treatment of teachers.

2065438+In June 2008, the Central Committee issued the Opinions on Comprehensively Deepening the Construction and Reform of Teachers in the New Era, which clarified two things. First, all localities are required to improve the treatment of teachers, which should not be lower or even slightly higher than the level of local civil servants in principle; Second, it is proposed to deepen the reform of teachers' professional titles and evaluation system in primary and secondary schools, appropriately increase the proportion of middle and senior teachers in primary and secondary schools, and smooth the channels for teachers' professional development. According to the opinions of the central authorities and local conditions, various localities have formulated specific implementation opinions and measures. Among them, Heilongjiang, Liaoning, Jilin, Shandong and other places have made it clear that teachers who have been rooted in rural grassroots for a long time and have been teaching for 20 or 30 years and contributed to the development of local education can apply for the title of senior teacher, that is, they can be promoted to senior titles "naturally". According to the current policy, female cadres (including teachers) above the deputy senior middle school can postpone their retirement until they are 60 years old. This means that female teachers can work until they are 60 years old.

At present, the country is formulating a delayed retirement policy. Therefore, it is unrealistic for teachers to retire early at present. On the contrary, it is good to give teachers enough respect in the treatment of professional titles, especially the old teachers who have been fighting in the front line for decades.

This situation seems to be contrary to the national policy of delaying retirement. Although the policy of delaying retirement has not yet landed, I think it should be a foregone conclusion, and retirement will be postponed sooner or later!

Under this social background, it is estimated that it is impossible to apply for retirement after teaching for more than 30 years. Even if there is, it is estimated that the pressure of public opinion is also great!

Even if the policy allows, let's see if many people apply for early retirement. We work because we need wages. As far as the current salary level is concerned, the salary level of teachers is not high, let alone wealth. Under normal circumstances, teachers with 30 years of teaching experience are basically people in their fifties, and children are basically out of work. In this case, it is boring to retire at home, but their physical strength is not enough to leave. And the retirement salary of 30 years of teaching experience is not high, so it is estimated that there are not many people who choose to retire!

Personal opinion, for reference only!

At the end of 20 18, many people did analyze that middle school teachers may apply for retirement after teaching for 30 years.

Many people have this speculation, mainly because of the revision of the Civil Service Law of 20 18 12.29. Article 93 of the Civil Service Law stipulates that civil servants who meet one of the following conditions may retire early upon their voluntary application and approval by the appointment and removal organ. Among them, article 1 clearly stipulates that the working experience is over 30 years.

In addition, according to the "Reform Opinions on Comprehensively Deepening the Construction of Teachers in the New Era", the Teacher Law has also been included in the scope of revision. However, judging from the revised draft of the Teachers Law that can be found at present, it is not written into the draft that teachers can apply for retirement after teaching for 30 years.

Although the draft itself has no legal effect and needs to be approved by relevant procedures before it has legal effect, from the past, the draft will not be much different from the final revised draft.

It has also been speculated that according to past practice, after the revision of the Civil Service Law, the education administration department will also issue corresponding policies. Matters not specified in the Teachers Law shall be implemented in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Service Law. For example, before the Ministry of Education issued a document, the average salary of teachers could not be lower than that of civil servants.

As a teacher, I certainly hope to apply for early retirement after 30 years of teaching experience. However, from the actual situation, there are still many practical obstacles to the introduction of this policy.

First of all, across the country, the salaries of teachers in most areas are generally low. If teachers choose to retire early, their real income will definitely drop sharply. Even some teachers can't maintain basic living security on retirement salary.

In this case, there will definitely be adverse selection. Those teachers with real ability will give priority to early retirement and then take part-time jobs in off-campus counseling institutions, while those teachers with relatively average ability or weak competitiveness in the job market will definitely choose to stay in school instead of applying for early retirement.

The education administration certainly doesn't want to see this happen. Of course, they expect some capable teachers to stay in their jobs.

Second, the shortage of teachers and the lack of teachers' resources are still the main problems facing education at present. This phenomenon is more serious in rural areas.

At present, there are about100000 primary and secondary school teachers in China, including about 8 million rural teachers, accounting for about 80%. Although the scale of teachers is very large, the age structure of teachers is U-shaped. Many schools have more teachers in their twenties, forties and fifties, and fewer middle-aged teachers. Moreover, from the perspective of gender, the proportion of young teachers is relatively large, because teachers' salaries are generally low now, and many young male college graduates would rather go to enterprises and institutions than become teachers.

Previously, small class teaching was implemented all over the country. However, due to the limitation of teachers, the class size in most countries is generally around 30~60, and some classes are still above 70.

On the one hand, there is a shortage of teachers, on the other hand, the age structure of teachers is seriously unreasonable. If teachers can apply for retirement in advance, there will probably be a shortage of teachers, which will aggravate the scarcity of teachers' resources.

Therefore, from the current situation, the follow-up policy direction is likely to extend the retirement age of teachers and give corresponding subsidies to teachers who have been teaching for more than 30 years. At the same time, teachers who have reached retirement age are encouraged to continue to engage in education, so that experienced, capable and energetic old teachers can continue to play their residual heat in education.

I think at least this statement is more reliable than delaying retirement age. Those who really deal with students all the year round rarely want to postpone their retirement age.

This should also be the voice of most real front-line teachers.

I have been teaching for 30 years, and I am over 50. Coupled with stress, overwork, poor health and rapid aging-students who like high values.

If you like, you can still choose to continue to play the residual heat according to your physical condition and subject characteristics.

Otherwise, add some hard conditions? This may be more in line with the current reality: rural work has been completed for 35 years.

Let me answer this question.

In my opinion, this practice is not like some people say that teachers will raise their hands in favor, and those who say yes are not real teachers or are lying.

In recent years, the state has allowed female cadres above the deputy division level or female teachers with senior titles equivalent to the deputy division level to postpone their retirement until the age of 60, but they can still retire at the age of 55 upon their own application.

As far as I know, so far, no senior female teacher in the county has applied for retirement at the age of 55.

This is because,

First, there will be a huge income gap.

A teacher in our school earned nearly 7000 yuan before retirement and less than 4000 yuan after retirement. If he doesn't engage in other jobs after retirement, his income will be reduced too much.

According to the current wage adjustment policy, the salary scale is adjusted once a year, which is more than 100 yuan. Adjust the standard every two years, and adjust the standard above 300 yuan every time. The gap between pre-retirement wages and post-retirement wages will become larger and larger.

According to the new retirement policy, new retirement measures will be implemented after 2024. The amount of pension is related to the funds in your account. The difference between 30-year retirement and 40-year retirement is even greater. The difference in pensions is also huge.

Second, it will be uncomfortable to go home and be idle.

Teachers are used to being with children. Although they are often angry with children, once they leave school, they will look very lost. If there is nothing else to do, it will be really boring to go home.

Third, life will be very irregular

Although I am used to a regular life, once I break the rule, it will be irregular. I used to get up at 6 o'clock at work and go to work after having some breakfast in a hurry. Come back at noon, busy cooking and eating, take a lunch break for half an hour, and then go to work; Come back at night, it's already dark, make dinner in a hurry, watch TV or read a book for a while and go to bed. Busy, but regular. Retired, these busyness are gone, and life has become irregular.

Who wants to retire early?

The first kind, a famous teacher with great energy.

Public schools can work in private schools after retirement. In this way, the total income will be much greater than the salary before retirement. Because they have retired, there is no problem of eating empty salaries.

Second, people who want to enjoy life.

I want to walk around while my legs and feet are still flexible. Although the retirement salary is not high, but in addition to living expenses, it is ok to spend one or two thousand yuan a year to travel.

Third, there are mines at home.

Wages account for a small proportion of income. I used to go to work to go to work. In fact, it doesn't matter whether you go to work or not. Now I can retire early, just in time to do other things wholeheartedly.

And many teachers have nothing to do with the above three situations. Is there one or not? I don't think there are many, if any.

Therefore, in my opinion, there is really no need to introduce such a policy.

Do you agree with me? Agree, please click "Follow" in the upper right corner.