Ask God to answer Sony A65. How about this camera? Compared with the camera of the same level, is it worth buying as a home camera? Or do you have any other suggestions?

Said Sony lenses were few and expensive.

It is recommended to buy a Sony bayonet16-50 mmf2.8 SSM.

Ultrasonic constant 2.8 aperture zoom lens

Then go to my friend at Canon Nikon, because the money for this lens is only enough to buy half a Canon 17-55mmF2.8, or 1/3 Cherokee Nikon17-55 MMF2.8..

Of course, this is a joke.

Sony A65 can be said to be the strongest model among Sony's entry-level single batteries, and it can also be said that this is the last batch of C-format single batteries of Sony, because the reliable news is that Sony will no longer have translucent single batteries in the future.

All cameras in the future will be focused by the main CMOS.

A65 is the shadow of A77. It has most functions of the A77, so it can be said to be a mid-range model. However, it also means that the cost performance is relatively low. Especially after A57 came out, A65 was even more unpopular, because the sensor of A57 was more reasonable and the picture quality was better. If you don't mind playing niche, you can consider A57.