Whether a theory is the truth or not, the fundamental point is to look at it

Whether a theory is the truth or not, the fundamental point is whether it can withstand the verification of the truth!

Harmful bacteria are everywhere in the world. Who has the ability to control them? However, humans are born with an immunoglobulin IgG gene. The IgG gene produces a large class of immunoglobulins. It is theoretically estimated that there are as many as 18 billion antigens. Immunoglobulins are specific antibodies produced against external antigens. External antigens have not yet come in. (It hasn't even happened yet), the IgG gene has already stored information about the unknown antigen, and prepared an antibody production method to deal with it. This is incredible! Moreover, a person may not encounter 18 billion antigens in his or her lifetime. Of course, this will completely throw away the "natural selection" that is not on the table in understanding the true knowledge of the universe. It must be applied over time and then retained, because science The fact discovered proves that it has functions before information occurs.

Who would have thought that "The Origin of Species" would turn out to be a ridiculous joke "In order to eat the leaves of tall trees, antelopes have long stretched their necks to become giraffes." The joke ignited Darwin's hypothesis. The "theory of evolution" was created as a result of the fuse, and coupled with the "similarity" found by "experts" who later wanted to become famous and start a family, apes became humans. This is the "science" that has occupied human ideology as human knowledge for more than 150 years;

According to the center of modern "evolution", Lamarck's "use or disuse theory" states that "organs change as they are used. Large, infrequently used organs become smaller due to degeneration" program theory; ostriches have degenerated wings because they cannot fly, moles have degenerated eyes while living in burrows, and antelopes have long been trying their best to eat the leaves of tall trees. The neck stretches and becomes a giraffe.

Regardless of whether it is a strange fetus or a deer calf; the fossils of giraffes (antelopes) and giraffes are available, but the intermediate-sized mesothorax cannot be found.

According to Darwin's "evolution theory", individual giraffes' necks have become longer through mutation, and through this "natural selection" God has eliminated those deer with short necks. Because this god of "natural selection" is very cruel and allows thousands of herbivores to live, but does not allow short-necked deer to eat shrub leaves and shorter green plant leaves on the ground, so what we see today is There are only giraffes with long necks.

The phenomenon seems to make sense indeed. Bamboo shoots will indeed turn into bamboo. But when you think about it carefully, it is really a sad knowledge, because bamboo shoots will never become pine trees. Lotus flowers can grow leaves as big as straw hats, but they will never turn into houses. This is something most children know. To put it more simply, have you ever heard someone say: In which generation can long-distance runners be able to step over the fence and enter the house with both feet? Human reproductive organs have been important organs that have been frequently used since the beginning of life. They have evolved to this day. I don’t know how many meters the male penis has grown over thousands of years?

5,000 years ago, Cangjie saw an “ox” with two horns on its head and four legs under its belly, so he coined the word “fish”. Seeing that the "fish" had no legs and only a tail, he made the character "ox". When the teachings were spread to various tribes, they were careless and turned upside down. The one with only one tail and no legs is pronounced as "cow", and the one with four horns is pronounced as "fish". Thousands of miles away, people are taught to pronounce the word "heavy" as "heavy". On the contrary, the word "heavy" (heavy), which should represent weight when two mountains are put together, teaches people to pronounce the word "chu" (chu) for traveling far away. It is still used today, and some readers and teachers have paid attention to it. Who can change the pronunciation of these words? Is it not wrong if the pronunciation of these words cannot be changed?

Someone discovered it at that time and pointed it out, but it has been taught to various tribes. Became a household name. For this reason, the person involved, Cangjie, was so ashamed that he even knelt down with tears in his eyes to express his repentance. However, these words have been spread all over the world and cannot be changed.

The same is true for Darwin's "Evolution Theory"; it was spread as a philosophy of struggle at that time, but now it is used as biology to influence people.

However, humans cannot change as apes. The person involved, Darwin, wrote with embarrassment in the "Extremely Perfect and Complex Organs" section of Chapter 6 (Theoretical Problems) of his book "The Origin of Species": "I frankly admit that The hypothesis that eyes were formed through natural selection seems to be the most ridiculous. "Similarly, many advanced researchers and truly accomplished scientists have discovered and pointed out this. Darwin also expressed remorse, but it had already spread all over the world. He did not expect that people would actually treat his "theory of evolution" as "science" and put it on the screen. The only way to coax the fish down is to draw the four legs of the "fish" into tails, and the mistakes can only be passed on to this day. No one cares, no one knows, they just copy and copy, because its shape is no longer a pictogram. , regardless of whether it has four legs or eight legs. Unfortunately, the word "heavy" thousands of miles away is too obvious, and people often see it. My parents-in-law and my descendants racked their brains and searched for etymology, but they couldn't find any eloquent words. No matter how many years of influence, no one can change it, as long as they "never admit their mistakes".

However, people who have never seen a "fish" should not insist that "fish" have four legs; even if people have seen a "fish", they should not open their mouths and say Shouted: "Fish" has four legs! If you want to mix it with "science", you are not allowed to be false at all.

Even a scientific explanation of the tangible phenomenon "seeing is believing" may not necessarily be the real truth;

When we look at Altair and Vega in the sky, they are both small stars. The highlight, in fact, is that Altair and Vega are 10 and 50 times brighter than the Sun, and 7 and 27.6 times larger in diameter.

People! What is knowledge? Only one kind of knowledge is true. One plus one is two. If the answer is not two, it is wrong or false. Stop being childish. There is no sophistry to explain. Using strong words can only show your stupidity.

The word "evolution" conforms to human logical reasoning, but "apes evolve into humans" does not have any credible evidence or scientific reason. If one more year of study means one more year of vacation, then what’s the point of graduating from college?

Today, when dark matter and dark energy have been revealed by modern scientists, they will soon unravel the secrets of the universe. When all mysteries are revealed, I believe that human beings will occupy the palace of true "science", and the hat of "science" will definitely be worn on the head of true "science".