Is there a term "object in advance" in ancient Chinese? What is its relationship with object in advance?

The literal meanings of "object in advance" and "object in advance" are actually the same.

The so-called "preposition", the "position" in it, means "placement". "Object prepositioning" means "putting the object in front". "Object in advance" actually means the same thing. That is: "lift the object and place it in the front".

Some scholars are deliberately pretentious and insist on making any distinction between the two. In fact, there is no need at all. Both words mean the same thing. We only need to distinguish different "preposition types" under the term "object preposition".

“Object in front”, “object in advance”, and “object inverted” actually mean the same thing. In teaching, we do not advocate the idea that the referents are "different" (sometimes it is said to be "object in front"; another moment it is said to be "object in advance"; another moment it is said to be "object inverted"). It is easy to confuse students. Any teacher who does this during lectures is not a good Chinese teacher.

The writing habits of normal Chinese word order are:

1. Subject - predicate - object (after the predicate)

2. Preposition - object ( After the preposition) - Another name for the preposition is "preposition" (that is, "the word before the noun or pronoun".)

Any violation of the above word order, and the object Putting something before a predicate or preposition can be called "object preposition", also called "object preposition" - there is no substantial difference between the two.