Is slam dunk a work of conscience?

After watching this movie, my strongest feeling is emptiness. Walking out of the cinema and on the sparsely populated road, I feel that this night is the most confusing one for me since 2008. The night is so beautiful that the rain and snow that have been raging for more than half a month have finally gone, the cold wind has subsided and the temperature has obviously warmed up. The sky is like a dark blue tablecloth, covered with stars and embroidered with a crescent moon. I didn't appreciate the beauty of this beautiful night, so I ran into the movie screening hall where a group of vulgar audiences lived to see such a crappy movie. If I hadn't been afraid of pain since I was a child, I really wanted to beat myself up to calm my heart. A movie should at least have a complete and full story, that is, the plot; If you can't do this, at least build a decent framework; If you can't do this, at least lay out a clue. Of course, slam dunk is not without plot, but it is like a piece of land, or made of chicken feathers; Slam Dunk Master is not without a frame, but staggered and twisted, like a dangerous building that is crumbling before it is covered to the top; Slam dunks are not without clues. In fact, it has many clues, and it has become a mess, and it can't solve a major one. In a word, if you really want to see this movie, you'd better take a magnifying glass. Generally speaking, the film is only partial, not the whole. Some people may say that comedy is nothing more than fascinating and shaking the burden. The luggage is naturally a small part, there is nothing wrong with it. If you know so much about comedy, I suggest you stop wasting money in the cinema, turn on the computer, find a wonderful joke website and read all the jokes one by one, because according to your understanding, this is the best comedy. In my opinion, comedy is a movie first, but a movie must have a complete plot first.