Russia's invasion of Ukraine was a joke.

Russian President Vladimir Putin was authorized to use the federal armed forces outside Russia on the 22nd. This incident has aroused people's speculation and worry, and even thinks that it will further intensify the contradiction between Russia and Ukraine. In fact, this understanding is that the cause of the "Russian-Ukrainian conflict" is attributed to Russia's unilateral "small moves", which is inaccurate, because the root of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict does not lie in some Russian "small moves", such as military exercises and authorization.

Indeed, in recent days, the "Ukrainian crisis" has been pushed to the forefront. In the eyes of people who don't understand, this "crisis" seems to have been concocted by Russia. This is the result of western media hype. For example, when Russia conducted military exercises on its own territory, some people speculated that it was about to "invade" Ukraine, and even predicted the specific "invasion" time: first, it was predicted as "16", and then it was predicted as "20" after being beaten in the face, and the result was still beaten in the face. It is the United States, which is used to creating local turmoil and then profiting from it, that labels Russia as an "invasion" and unambiguously predicts the invasion time.

Only those who are afraid of chaos in the world will constantly "play with fire" and "arch fire". The "arch fire" on the Russian border has constantly fueled the fire and fanned the flames. It is a "masterpiece" after the Biden administration took office. For some time, the United States and its allies have spared no effort to create tensions and spread the strange theory of "invasion", which is the final result of the thinking of "long arm jurisdiction". From the Iraq war to the Afghanistan war, which is not the result of this "arch fire" and "playing with fire"! Now that the long arm has reached the door of Russia, how can Russia sit idly by?

After careful analysis, it is not difficult to see that although Ukraine has been pushed to the front, the real conflict is actually the conflict between Russia and the United States, the first western NATO country. NATO once promised not to expand eastward, but in fact it kept approaching Russia. If Ukraine is really pulled into NATO, it will be pushed directly to Russia's doorstep, and once Russia lacks a buffer zone, it will face great danger, which no sovereign country wants to see. Of course, it will not be bullied by "home", and it will certainly respond. Then, Russia's recent series of "actions", including military exercises and authorization, are just a stress response to this.

From this, we can clearly see that the so-called "Russia-Ukraine conflict" is just a game between Russia and the United States and other western countries, and Ukraine is just a pawn in the game of great powers.

On the other hand, Putin's authorization of force is only a stress response to NATO's eastward expansion and the United States' "arch fire." It is more of a deterrent and a "warning".

However, the name "using force" is actually out of the need of "peacekeeping". The war in Wudong area is not the result of "invasion", but the confrontation between Ukrainian government forces and civilian armed forces. As for Russia's recognition and peacekeeping operations after the independence of the two republics, it is also out of consideration of "fire fighting". If it is allowed to continue to use force, regional turmoil will continue to spread.

Of course, we still hope to solve regional conflicts through diplomatic means and solve regional hot issues through dialogue.