As a lawyer, what is the strangest divorce case you have ever encountered?

The woman sued for divorce because of long-term domestic violence, and I represented her.

At the time of divorce, the man said that the child was not his own and took out the paternity test report from other places six months ago.

The woman refused to admit it. It is said that work and home are two points and one line after marriage, and there is no ambiguity with other men. No matter what that person says. Promise me again and again, I said, if you are so sure, go and apply for an appraisal.

The court entrusted the appraisal. Results The appraisal result entrusted by the court was completely consistent with the appraisal result issued by the man. Abiotic!

The woman still insisted that the child was a man and asked me what to do. Is there any other way?

It is impossible to do it again, there is no reasonable and legal reason!

I said, is it wrong for the baby to be born in the hospital, or do an appraisal with the baby? If it's not yours, you can prove it. The court agreed with me. You can do it yourself or entrust it to the court.

The woman does not agree, nor does she recognize the appraisal report that is not her own!

Finally, of course, the court adopted the non-biological appraisal report as the basis for finalizing the case.

Do you think the woman is so persistent to save face, or is there really another possibility?

Some people say that if the man's mother was pregnant with twins at the beginning, but the other one did not survive, but was implanted with another embryo, that is, the man's body, it may also be identified as not biological. Never seen a case, read the report.

Welcome @ Shanghai Yang Lawyer

A case experienced by a lawyer friend.

Both husband and wife are teachers, and their feelings are particularly good. There has always been a thorn in a man's mind that his son looks less and less like himself.

Couples have round faces, and children have long faces. Once a child got pneumonia, the man went to see a doctor and secretly did a blood type test. Results Both husband and wife have type B blood, while the son has type ab blood.

The doctor told the man that if both parents have type B blood, then the child's blood type may be type B or O, and there will be no type A or ab.

The man loved the child very much and said nothing during the child's hospitalization, but after the child was discharged from the hospital, he took the divorce agreement and asked the woman to sign it. The property is half for each person, and the children belong to the woman.

However, the woman insisted that she had never cheated, and the man took the child to have a DNA test. The results also show that men and children are not related by blood.

The man insisted on divorce, and finally the two went to court.

My friend is that woman's lawyer. The lawyer suggested that the woman and the child should have a paternity test, and the result was that the woman and the child were not related by blood.

Obviously, the child was wrongly reported, and the man took the hospital where the baby was delivered to court.

Originally, the case ended here, but the world is big and wonders, and what belongs to you will always belong to you.

Half a month later, the lawyer took another case. As in the previous case, this man is not related to this child.

After the lawyer gave the woman advice, the result of paternity test was that she was not related to the child.

Surprisingly, the lawyer found that the photo of the boy in the second case was very similar to the man in the first case, and the blood type was the same. The lawyer checked the information of the last case and found that the birth date of the children in the two cases was the same, with a difference of three minutes. And they are hospitalized in the same hospital and ward, and they are all boys.

That evening, the lawyer asked the two sides to meet. After the meeting, the two children played together. They are classmates, and both of them have been to each other's house to play.

After the lawyer explained the situation to both parties, both parties took their children to have a paternity test the next day. The identification results prove that the two sides are holding the wrong child.

It was supposed to be a happy ending, but the two children never agreed to exchange. After all, they have lived with each other's parents for eight years and have long regarded each other's parents as their own biological parents.

I am a lawyer specializing in marriage and family affairs, and there are countless wonderful cases, one of which is the most wonderful.

The client is a woman and the man has been cheating on the opposite sex for a long time. The man used his mobile phone to save a high-definition video of him and the opposite sex ML outside marriage, and the woman collapsed after seeing it. ...

The woman found me and asked me to help her sue for divorce, and the evidence was submitted. ...

As a lawyer, I have seen many wonderful things, especially divorce cases. The best case is not represented by me. A colleague of mine represented the man in a divorce case. The case was prosecuted by the woman, who demanded a divorce. The man resolutely disagreed with the divorce for the sake of two children. Normally, he sued for divorce for the first time. If the other party strongly disagrees and there is no particularly good evidence to prove that the other party is at fault, the judge will generally prohibit divorce. The woman said anxiously, do you think the two children are yours? In fact, it's not yours. After hearing this, the man made a paternity test, and it was not his own, so he agreed to divorce, and the marriage finally divorced. But it's not beautiful. I have met several cases of raising children for others. Strangely, after the divorce, this woman often went to our law firm to find a lawyer representing the man. Her reason is that I have a date outside, and that man has long known and never cared. This time the man agreed to divorce, which must have been instigated by this bad lawyer. It's too bad that this lawyer destroyed other people's families. This logic is too wonderful for her to make sense. Our lawyer was completely helpless when she met this kind of woman, so as soon as she came, the troubled lawyer ran away, and others stayed at a respectful distance from her, only pitying our director, who had to receive her personally every time, with low eyes. After such a long time, she gradually calmed down and stopped visiting.

Real case, refresh your three views!

CaseNo.: 1:20 16. A female client contacted me and planned to sue for divorce. Her reason is simple. After two years of marriage, she had a child, but when the child was 4 years old, she found that the father was bisexual. By a very coincidence, she found some strange clothes that her father usually prepared under the table in her father's office, and then she negotiated with her father and finally came to this conclusion. She was devastated and wanted a divorce, but two days after returning home, she said that the marriage would not be separated for the time being, because the father of the child assured him that she could meet her financial needs, but this matter could not be told to others. For the sake of family and children, she can only bear it. And then there's nothing after that.

In the second case represented by 20 18, we were the defendant, the man and the woman sued for divorce, and divided the contents of the common property of husband and wife, from household appliances, furniture, security doors, daily household appliances to pots and pans, and even tablecloths. Dozens of property projects are listed before and after. The plaintiff even asked for a piece of cover cloth on the purchased water dispenser. At that time, the defendant saw the plaintiff's complaint, and the defendant collapsed and was very angry. Of course, in the end, large items such as furniture and household appliances will be handled by the court, and other items will not be handled.

The third case, 20 15 non-divorce proceedings. The reason why he is a non-divorce lawsuit is that the case ended up in vain and did not enter the proceedings. The woman is a grass-roots worker and the man is a freelancer, both of whom are in their thirties. When two people get married, they have their own ideas. The woman is worried that she will be gossiped behind the leader's back all day, while the man is worried that she will be pointed at because of her sexual orientation. The last two people got married, but only in form. Before marriage, both parties agreed that the property should be owned by the other party, and their private lives should not interfere with each other. Every month, each party will contribute a certain amount of money as public welfare fund to pay for the water, electricity, coal, heating and other related expenses of the living room. Two people have no children, no husband and wife life, in order not to give others a bite to eat, live together. Can you believe it?

The fourth case, the divorce dispute that has just been closed. The man sued for divorce three times, and the defendant first disagreed, and then disagreed with the divorce. The reason why the defendant disagreed with the divorce was that both parties still lived in the same house (one person and one room). The reason for agreeing to divorce is that the information investigated by her lawyer shows that the man has a large number of credit cards, savings cards and Alipay in and out of the account within two years, so he wants to advocate that the man transfer nearly one million yuan of property, but the man fully proves it. The man's evidence can completely prove that the man can't maintain the family's living expenses through credit cards, online loans and other means. It is basically the mode of robbing Peter to pay Paul. The so-called property transfer does not exist at all. Seeing this situation, the woman gave up the lawsuit and resolutely disagreed with the divorce. The woman knows very well that the man still has to pay the mortgage every month. Without divorce, she will have a place to live and get the man's money to pay the mortgage. Before the trial, the woman found a job, but after the court ruled, the woman resigned directly at home. The man repeatedly felt unable to get rid of it and racked his brains to raise money to maintain his family's normal life. In the end, it was "unjust panic" that the woman detained the hat of transferring nearly one million property!

I met a female teacher who gave birth to a boy with a male colleague behind her back.

1. The husband of the female teacher is a soldier, and the male colleague hooked up with the female teacher when the soldier was not at home. As a result, the two of them colluded and gave birth to a son. The poor soldier always thought that the child was his own, until the child was three or four years old, and the soldier accidentally discovered that the child was not his own.

2. As a result, the serviceman found that the serviceman divorced the female teacher, and the female teacher left home with the children born with her lover, and the house and car were owned by the serviceman. When competing for property, female teachers still know that they are indefensible and don't want anything. After all, she is on the wrong side.

This soldier is a man of great achievement. He didn't do anything to the female teacher, nor did he say anything hurtful. It's really not easy to do this. However, the military wife's husband is not a vegetarian, and he directly sued the male teacher for destroying the military marriage. The male teacher was sentenced to three years in prison, and the male teacher naturally lost his job.

4. A friend in need is a friend indeed. Female teachers and male teachers turned against each other and passed the buck to each other. They all said they were seduced by each other. With the male teacher in prison, the female teacher also made a clean break with the male teacher. The female teacher who suffered the consequences herself couldn't stand the strange eyes of her colleagues and ran away from home.

5. Extramarital affairs hurt the military spouse's husband, and the male teacher also reaped the consequences, while the female teacher did not benefit. The most pitiful thing is how innocent the children born to female teachers and male teachers are. I don't know how it feels when children grow up and know their own life experiences.

What do you think of extramarital affairs? Welcome to leave a message for discussion!

Pay attention to @ Suqian lawyer Wu Jie telling you the law!

I once knew a woman with a bad lifestyle. Once she cheated on her at home and was found by her husband. Her husband was very angry and accused her of wearing a three-point suit with a man at home. The woman pleaded in court: "You go to the seaside to see, don't all women wear 3 points?" ? Don't all men wear underwear? I wear three-point at home, and does the other man wear underwear? Was it an affair? "After listening to her defense, people feel ridiculous. This incident was turned into a joke by many people, but it came from real life.

I have represented the most wonderful divorce case: the man came to us and said that the woman sued for divorce, but he didn't want a divorce and needed us to be his agent. We specifically asked if there were legal reasons for divorce (cheating, violence, gambling, drug abuse and other bad habits), and he insisted that there wasno. During the trial, the other party took out a video of him taking selfies with a third party in bed. After reading it, even the judge changed color and decided to divorce at one time. He can't understand why his ex-wife has a video of him and mistress. Later, after investigation, I learned that Xiaosan provided it to my ex-wife. It is true that two women play together, but it is a pity that he is the only male pig's foot.

The strange case I met was that you didn't think they would get divorced at all.

I met a divorce case. The relationship between the two sides is very good. The woman's request was met by the man, and the man's request was met by the woman. The two were in harmony and even walked hand in hand.

In this way, the two divorced, and I tried my best to persuade them to be invalid. The reason for divorce is even more wonderful. The woman thinks that the man is too good to himself, so good that he doesn't mind even if he likes his neighbors.

After the divorce, they moved out of the city. I hope they are happy in the distance!

Beauty with a dog: Lawyer, I want to divorce him because he can't stand my dog!

Lawyer: Wait, that's it?

Beauty: Yes, I love him very much, and he loves me, but he just can't stand my dog. I have kept it for five years, and my parents have died, so this dog is the only relative. ...

Lawyer: He asked you to choose between the dog and him, didn't he?

Beauty: Yes, I choose dogs! I can find another man, and this is my only dog! But I must make it up to you ...

Lawyer: What compensation do you want?

Beauty: I have no job and no income. I can't live with my dog after the divorce, so he must make it up to me. ...

Plaintiff (female): Judge, I want a divorce.

Judge: Why?

Plaintiff: There are two things. First, he betrayed me. This is the guarantee he wrote to me, saying that he will never cheat again, which proves that he is a recidivist of cheating. The second is that he can't do it. This is his inspection report ... "

Judge: Do you want to prove whether he can? Good for others or bad for you? Can it be cured?

Plaintiff: The doctor says he can't do it, but he can do it for others? Such people cheat. ...........................................................................................................................................................................

Judge: ...