Whether it helps the society or not is a hot topic in reading comprehension.

"Help or not" is an indisputable moral bottom line issue, and I quite agree with this view. From last year's child fall in Dazhou, grandma was accused of being the perpetrator, Beijing aunt was hit by a foreigner's electric car, and then to the Spring Festival Evening sketch "Help or Not". It seems that "help or not" has become a hot word in public opinion, resulting in the tragedy of "can't help" ...

Liang Ya, a 35-year-old female manager of a foreign company, fell on the exit steps of Shenzhen Station in February this year/in the early morning of KOOC-0/7/KOOC-0: 29, and kept the same posture for 50 minutes. Emergency personnel arrived at the scene and found Liang Ya dead. Surveillance video shows that Liang Ya called for help after he fell. However, no one helped her or clothed her, and Liang Ya lay on the cold ground until she died.

For this kind of abnormal death, many people don't want to talk about the heavy topic of "help or not". Even if I want to change the subject, I want to try not to entangle the transition. For this incident, many media people condemned the lag of relevant departments in responding to sudden disasters, and questioned who should be responsible for the citizens killed at the subway entrance.

Indeed, young life is so "alas" and abnormal death is deplorable. The reason is that we don't lack such a kind of thinking, hesitation and entanglement of "help or not". Afraid of this and that, I would rather lament his misfortune than provoke him, so I can only shout to death. This is the sorrow of human nature and society, and the evil consequences of "helping or not" can only be eaten by ourselves. At this time, you will find that the excessive entanglement of "help or not" will not only bring mental trauma, but also bring human disasters, and you will also fall into the quagmire of "help or not"? Do you still feel the need to argue about "help or not"?

Song Dandan said, "To help or not to help, the debate itself is meaningless." If you think about it carefully, this statement has profound meaning, and you need to stand in a specific social angle to appreciate the truth. In my opinion, if a society keeps falling into such moral generalization, it is itself lack of public opinion control, which will cause ugly ripples and disasters that should not be repeated, Ceekay. After all, "help or not" is really an undisputed moral bottom line issue. Excessive entanglement in the discussion of "helping or not" will only form a negative orientation and "halo effect" on morality. Liang Ya, who died at the subway entrance, is a good example.

Someone once asked the old man what happened. Is it because the elderly have more social morality that they fall, and the old are all bad? Actually, it's not. Too many old people are not necessarily bad. We will all grow old. This is the law of nature. Song Dandan said, "Public opinion should focus on how to solve the problems of the elderly, rather than discussing whether the elderly are bad." I think this statement is correct. Although Song Dandan's mother is an example, it is an indisputable fact that society is facing the problem of aging. The outstanding problems of the elderly prove that the problems of the elderly should not be blocked.

We should look for more loopholes and gaps in the problem of the elderly. Only by gradually improving and realizing the old people's sense of security, happiness and medical care can we fill the loopholes and gaps. As for productive old age, it needs the support of every reform and everyone's detailed actions.

Therefore, whether for individuals or public opinion society, "helping or not" is an undisputed moral bottom line issue.