Diabetes Roche Johnson Omron blood glucose meter which is better ~

1. 1000 yuan can buy three of the best home blood glucose meters in the world.

2. Pain has nothing to do with blood glucose meter.

It is related to the blood collection pen, needle and blood collection volume, and whether the patient's operation is correct.

Personal experience: the best is Roche's latest blood collection pen Multiclix (but it is not listed in China), followed by Ultrasoft, a slightly painful needle imported by Johnson & Johnson (it has not been imported on the counter of pharmacy at the beginning of this year, and domestic needles are a headache).

2. Johnson Roche These blood glucose meters, which have been approved by the US FDA and the US Food and Drug Administration in China, are safe to use correctly, but you need to know about them and relevant information.

3. The amount of blood collected does not determine the accuracy of the results. The most advanced noninvasive blood glucose meter is as accurate as blood sampling. However, the less blood is collected, the more standardized blood collection operation is needed, otherwise tissue fluid in the body or other residual liquids on fingers (such as alcohol for disinfection) will affect the results.

4. Omron has not been listed in China for a long time. Abroad, it has only heard of its sphygmomanometer and never seen its blood glucose meter. One of the reasons why I didn't choose for my family is the large amount of blood collected by China Roche blood glucose meter. The portability of Johnson & Johnson is not much different from that of Wenhao. The amount of blood drawn by Wenhao is 1ul, and the result comes out in 5 seconds (the ml of LZ is terrible, with a difference of 10 times). Abbott Antoine surpassed it, and the amount of blood collected was 0.6ul, and the result was obtained in 6 seconds, which is the least among the domestic and foreign machines I know. Similarly, if this blood glucose meter uses the latest test paper from abroad, the amount of blood collected is 0.

Several people upstairs also mentioned that the price of blood glucose meter is a one-time consumption, but the test paper is a long-term consumption. If we consider the economic problem of using blood glucose meter, we should pay more attention to the performance of blood glucose meter and the cost performance of long-term consumption of test paper, rather than the cost performance of blood glucose meter performance and blood glucose meter price.

Purchase suggestion:

1. From the economic point of view: calculate the test paper volume and economic basis.

You first calculate how many test strips you or your family need a month.

Then calculate how much you can afford with so many papers.

Find the corresponding blood glucose meter within the cost range of this test paper.

2. From the perspective of accuracy: understand the types of test strips used by blood glucose meters and the situation of home medication.

If your family does not take drugs containing sugars other than glucose (such as xylose and maltose), you can choose glucose dehydrogenase test paper (Roche Abbott, etc. ) or glucose oxidase test paper (Johnson Bayer et al. ); If you use other sugar drugs other than glucose at home, you can only choose glucose oxidase test paper.

Because glucose dehydrogenase will react with some non-glucose sugars such as maltose, galactose and xylose, the reading of blood glucose meter is falsely high. If the patient is treated according to this false high value, it may cause abnormal hypoglycemia, coma and even death. (according to/yxjs/lcjyjc/2009051918827 _1.html,/yxjs/lcjyjc/20090519/.

3. Consider purchasing channels:

You can buy parallel blood glucose meters, because foreign blood glucose meters are cheaper and can be given to diabetics for free, so there are no fakes. But don't buy parallel test papers, most of which are fake. Foreign test papers are not cheap, or even more expensive. How can there be cheap genuine parallel test papers?

In addition, the blood glucose level is a reading influenced by too many factors, so the accuracy of the blood glucose meter is not so demanding, and stability is more important. The most important thing is to let the detected values guide patients to control diet, exercise and take medicine on time.

I wish you success in controlling sugar!

Supplement:

1. The non-invasive blood glucose meter is mentioned to explain to LZ that the accuracy of the blood glucose meter has nothing to do with the amount of blood collected, but is related to the technical content of the blood glucose meter and the way patients collect blood. Roche's domestic blood glucose meters usually collect more blood than other brands.

2. Other personal opinions

1) I wonder if Omron is Abbott's brand. Although Abbott's blood glucose meter is not well-known in China, it does not mean that Abbott's products are not good, nor does it mean that Abbott's blood glucose meter is the same as China's internationally. It is recognized by the industry that Abbott's technology is the most advanced, Johnson & Johnson's after-sales service is the best, and Roche is the easiest to operate. It is acceptable to see that Abbott's reputation in China is not good, because Abbott sells through agents in China, paying attention to agency fees, but does not do a good job in brand promotion, let alone after sales. Johnson & Johnson and Roche focus on establishing brand image and after-sales service through sales of subsidiaries in China.

2) There is doubt about the statement that the faster the result, the worse the stability of the blood glucose meter. For example, blood glucose meters with a measurement time of 5 seconds basically have the problem of poor stability. Why do hospitals like to use Johnson & Johnson (15 seconds -30 seconds) instead of Johnson & Johnson (5 seconds)? "

If the blood glucose meter with faster results is unstable, it will not be listed by FDA. This is like comparing the hot water supply system of a five-star hotel with the domestic water heater with Johnson in the hospital.

Steady Stepsure and its predecessor, Onetouch II, are both blood glucose meters approved by the FDA for use in hospitals, but they are not sold on the shelves of pharmacies in Europe and North America like other blood glucose meters. On the one hand, it shows their accuracy and stability, but on the other hand, it also shows that they are not suitable for home testing. The biggest disadvantage of household stability is blood sampling 5- 15ul. Such a large amount of blood collection is undoubtedly a kind of torture for sugar friends who have to be tested several times a day, and it is a hidden danger for sugar friends who have poor blood sugar control and wounds that are not easy to heal. Therefore, steadiness is most suitable for regularly measuring accurate blood sugar values for patients in hospitals.

And Roche Abbott Bayer Johnson's various home portable blood glucose meters, including Wen Hao, are designed for daily home monitoring. The FDA does not allow this blood glucose meter to enter hospitals, although there are hospitals in China. However, the FDA and the US Food and Drug Administration in China were able to approve its marketing for home testing, which shows that such products meet the requirements of home testing. Stability, accuracy, short time, less blood collection and simple operation are the properties that this kind of products should improve.

The purpose of daily monitoring at home is to help patients monitor the blood sugar level within a healthy range (rather than a completely accurate reading value to diagnose whether they have diabetes), help them adjust the variety and quantity of diet, adjust the way and intensity of exercise, and adjust their medication through the average value detected in a certain period.

This anonymous person gave me a "child care" hat in his other masterpiece, and he said:

Thank you for laughing in your other masterpiece. I misremembered the model of Bayer blood glucose meter test paper. Bayer uses glucose oxidase. Let me correct it. The LZ here has been corrected. I also want to remind everyone that the purpose of sugar friends and their families in answering questions is not to score points by attacking or even insulting other respondents, but whether the answers provided can really help them.

I hope everyone will not create an atmosphere of debate, and don't always maliciously slander others and publish anonymously. It's always a bit like a villain with an arrow in the back. If you are also a diabetic, always being hostile to them is not conducive to controlling blood sugar. Are you concerned about the psychotherapy of diabetic patients? congratulations