How can we know whether a pair of traditional Chinese medicine is effective without double-blind experiment?

Traditional Chinese medicine does not do double-blind experiments, how do you know that a pair of traditional Chinese medicine is effective? Whether a drug is effective or not is ultimately reflected in the patient. Only when the patient has used it will he know whether it is effective or not.

Can Chinese medicine do double-blind experiments? Absolutely. Let me give you a simple example. When I was a child, there was an old Chinese doctor named Meng in our village, who was famous for treating falls and broken bones and muscles. In the early days of liberation, because he was classified as a landlord, he was arrested for labor reform. He met another Chinese medicine practitioner in the reform-through-labour camp, and both of them were disobedient. Finally, the leader of the reform-through-labour farm found two rams of that year, knocked off a sheep's foot and let everyone treat one. The seriously injured were treated by Dr. Meng in our village, and the slightly injured were treated by another person. Results the one treated by Dr. Meng could be forced to walk for a week and a month as usual. Another doctor treated him, and it took him a month to walk on the ground. From this, it is thought that what medicine, what experiment, is not to prove the efficacy? Chinese medicine can do any experiment based on curative effect.

Simplicity, convenience, cheapness and experience are the characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine, which is one of the reasons why it has been spread among the people for a long time. Since ancient times, almost all people engaged in traditional Chinese medicine have experimented by themselves. In addition, no doctor has ever heard of testing drugs on himself, so there is no need for Chinese medicine to spend huge investment to do unnecessary experiments.

Many people will say that this is an excuse for not doing double-blind experiments. Traditional Chinese medicine is unscientific, so it is afraid to do it. That is wrong. As long as you pay, you are responsible for data collection, you are responsible for double-blind experiments, and all necessary things, such as fractures, can accompany you to do an experiment. This time, instead of looking for mice, look for sheep as guinea pigs and break the leg of lamb. You use the method of western medicine and I use the method of Chinese medicine to see who is effective. I don't have a certificate. It is illegal to treat people, but I can always treat sheep. If my method is effective through your double-blind experiment, I can charge a sky-high patent fee, and my medicine can sell at a high price in the market. Why not?

Double-blind experiment is not so much a test standard for all drugs to be effective or ineffective as a paper pass for western pharmaceutical groups to obtain new drugs for production and sales. Regardless of validity or invalidity.

Different medical systems have different inspection standards and methods. If they are double blind, they will be safe and effective. If it is not double-blind, will it be invalid? Please answer in the comments section.

It is impossible for Chinese medicine to do experiments, not just double-blind. There will be contradictions in any experiment for various reasons. The reason is that if you do an experiment, put Chinese medicine in the sunshine of scientific experiments. That would be terrible. A large number of employees will lose their jobs and the national tax revenue will be huge. Let's equate TCM with tobacco.

First, who ordered the binocular experiment? What is the standard? Under what conditions? This name is recognized by the world? Or are some interest groups set up for their own interests? Evidence for who?

The inheritance and development of Chinese medicine in China for thousands of years, and the treatment of all kinds of acute and painful patients are the best results of the "billion eyes" experiment.

A man should have a little backbone and ignore his excellent culture, but he worships foreign things and has the genes of fake foreign slaves implanted in his bone marrow, but he has turned himself into a native foreign country. This is his sorrow!

I didn't know this double-blind experiment was noble, and everything had to be verified before it could be recognized, which made me afraid to eat the pot cooked in Lian Gang. Can you even eat a pot without double-blind experiments?

How do you know how big shoes to buy without measuring the exact size of your feet with a ruler?

Han Feizi told a story called "Zheng people buy shoes".

Legend has it that a A Zheng man accurately measured the length of his feet with a straw rope at home, and then went to a distant market to buy shoes. I put this straw rope on the table when I left, and I didn't find it until the market. I hesitated for a long time and didn't know what to do. The person next to him said, do you know how big shoes to buy by trying with your feet? Zheng said, how can this work? I didn't know the size, so he hurried home to get the straw rope. When he gets to the market again, it's getting late and the market is over. Finally, the man had to go home empty-handed.

This is called "I would rather believe than be confident"!

Traditional Chinese medicine is different from modern western medicine. It is a chemical product developed by people through scientific experiments, but a plant, animal and mineral that has been ubiquitous in nature for a long time and has been fully recognized by most people through the ages. For thousands of years, Chinese medicine has been widely used to distinguish the cold, heat, acid and pungent of these drugs and their inhibitory effects on some evil drugs, and to adjust the deviation of human body by using the deviation of their natural properties.

Before the double-blind method of detecting chemical drugs appeared, Chinese medicine treated people there. Now some people question Chinese medicine with this double-blind. I think it is because people are honest and have no confidence in buying shoes!

If we have to verify Chinese medicine, we can't mechanically copy the inspection methods of chemical drugs, but create inspection methods suitable for the laws of Chinese medicine.

The application of traditional Chinese medicine is by no means a simple one-to-one combination, just as surgery is by no means a one-size-fits-all approach. Traditional Chinese medicine is ever-changing in the hands of doctors, and the focus is not on medicine but on the level of doctors. Just as the success of surgery lies not in the scalpel, but in the doctor's skill. It is better to test the skills of doctors than to test surgical instruments.

I hope that people who are keen on blind science will come up with scientific methods suitable for testing Chinese medicine as soon as possible, and don't impose Chinese medicine in completely inappropriate ways. This is a joke!

Whether a pair of traditional Chinese medicine is effective or not, patients have the most say. After taking the medicine, the illness is mild and the illness is good. Isn't this the best evidence that the drug is effective and the right medicine is available?

Please look at the international sales distribution of patented Chinese medicine. Japan accounts for more than 60%, South Korea accounts for about 20%, and our ancestral home country, the birthplace of Chinese medicine, only accounts for about 20%. That's pathetic!

Traditional Chinese medicine, the national treasure of China, has fallen far behind in the past. It should be full of confidence to catch up and win the glory that should belong to us as soon as possible, but some black officials of Chinese medicine keep clamoring and do everything possible to discredit Chinese medicine, which is ridiculous and hateful!

Chinese medicine can't be "double blind"! Chinese medicine pays attention to syndrome differentiation and treatment. Everyone is different, and everyone has one side! (Don't spray indiscriminately! I don't know, I don't understand, it's normal. Interlaced like a mountain, how can you know everything! But indiscriminate spraying is a problem of cultivation and upbringing. Traditional Chinese medicine is summed up by generations of people in China and China in their struggle with nature. Shennong tasted a hundred herbs and practiced by himself. Don't allow his ugly descendants to call their ancestors ignorant and shallow! )

Looking at human medicine to fight the epidemic, the double-blind science of western medicine can't save people. If you survive by luck, you will also have lifelong sequelae.

Traditional Chinese medicine is not blind, it is successful to fight the epidemic horse and kill the epidemic flag. Economic and efficient, no sequelae, obvious to all. This is the difference between brainless science in western Europe and wisdom medicine in traditional Chinese medicine.

Double-blind is just a test method. It is effective to take drugs without others knowing. This method is comparable to thousands of years of human experiments in traditional Chinese medicine.

Because the double-blind chemicals of western medicine have created more diseases for human beings (iatrogenic diseases and drug-induced diseases of western medicine), because your double-blind chemicals can't cure SARS COVID-19. So double-blind is wrong and anti-scientific. The street stinks, and some people are willing to use it to harm Chinese medicine and then China people.