After the incident of beating people in the Tang Dynasty, brand boycott and gender discrimination appeared. How to rationally resist violence?

Recently, the incident of beating people in Tangshan barbecue restaurant has aroused everyone's attention and heated discussion.

While exposing events and promoting actions, online public opinion also allows everyone to pick up a magnifying glass and analyze everyone's every move. None of this is surprising. What is outrageous is that the brand of T-shirt worn by one of the perpetrators has also encountered cyber violence.

In the video of beating people in Tangshan, an abuser wears a T-shirt with a big golden eagle pattern, on which the word boy is written.

So it was a boy? T-shirts are just one of the elements, but they have become the target of attack.

The advertising slogan used to be "You are only one boy away from hipsters? London ",but now it has become" You have only one boy from the society? " London.

Things are getting worse and worse. Someone sent a circle of friends and said, "Don't play this brand." A consumer will buy a boy casually because of this? London, give it back. After that, the target of netizens' attacks is no longer limited to boys? The official store in London, as long as it sells boys? The live broadcast of London clothes was attacked by netizens.

However, dress is only a style, not a standard for judging others. ?

Brands that have developed for so many years have been labeled as the standard of social people. This is probably when people sit at home and the pot falls from the sky. It's nothing if it's just for fun, but it's really inappropriate for personal behavior to rise to brand behavior.

Boy? London, yes. Boy? Londoners are also right. What is wrong is only the perpetrator.

The target of the attack should be the perpetrator, not the clothes worn by the perpetrator.

Originally, everyone's attention and voice on this matter was a just move, but the result turned into moral kidnapping and indiscriminate attack.

When defending justice, some people have changed from defenders of justice to abusers of the internet, but they just don't know it.

In addition, many netizens have raised this incident to a confrontation between men and women. I hope everyone will look at the problem rationally. The bad guys are the perpetrators, both men and women. Really don't involve everything in the opposition between men and women. This has little to do with equality between men and women. Now discussing gender issues is tantamount to an arch fire, and it is even easy to aggravate the original relationship between men and women.