Which is more real and objective, the fifteen years of Wanli or the Ming Dynasty?

Fifteen years of Wanli is more realistic and objective. Huang Renyu's works are more serious. He analyzed the reasons why a dynasty turned from prosperity to decline with almost plain brushstrokes. These plain narratives have their own merits. Even readers who are not interested in history are very touched.

Books about the Ming Dynasty were written in network language, which turned history into a living life story, so the authenticity and objectivity would be lacking.