What do you think of the original author's complaint that the producer of "Black Storm" cast threw a pot at the production company?

The crew bought the material from the material website, but the height of the uploaded material was not original. If the crew did spend money, it should be said that the crew was subjectively harmless, but objectively it did cause the gains and losses of the original. The original work has the right to claim tort liability from the crew, and the crew can recourse to the material website afterwards. Legally speaking, this chain of responsibility is clear.

Crew members are the real vested interests of the end users. Whether they know it or not, the fact of infringement is clear. Who is the original author not looking for you? As for how you follow up vjshi and the uploader, that's another story. To sum up, the website connives at the uploader's sneak shot of video sales for the benefit, signing a production company with luck, buying materials on a website with poor reputation at a low price, and the crew distrusts the production company, which is inefficient in handling the incident. At the same time, it also pays attention to clearing the responsibility and lacks communication with the infringed party. It can be seen that China's copyright protection and awareness of photographic works are still very insufficient.

The film can be directly negotiated with the original author, authorized by the original author, and paid the corresponding fees. After that, the film will hold the website and Gao Moumou accountable and demand compensation. If such a thing happens, it is better for the follow-up parties to negotiate and solve it. If the negotiation fails, they can only resort to law. However, such a thing reminds the film and television industry to pay attention to preventing copyright risks. As a material website, it should fulfill its prudent obligations, be responsible for users and be responsible for itself.

These short shots are too difficult to defend rights. It is estimated that the lawyer also suggested a settlement, and I don't know if this issue can be hot searched. If the settlement is reached, the amount of compensation is unknown, and we have no way of knowing it. But buying this kind of lens ranges from several thousand to several hundred thousand, and the photographic works also have artistic value. There is nothing wrong with insisting on sky-high prices, but the title of TV series is really not very important. You can't prove that this clip of yours has helped the TV series make a profit, and even sometimes the opening song is not on TV, which is inferior in compensation. So it is estimated that this matter has become a small joke, and it is estimated that there is no hot search.