Is it unfair for Guo to be fired?

I think there are problems on both sides. Guo was a little angry in this game. In the game, he yelled at the bench of Shanxi team, but the referee had a bigger problem. Just gave a technical foul and was immediately sent off for it. This penalty is unfair!

Guo played normally in the game and was not angry because he didn't score goals or made many mistakes. Guo was very angry because the scale of the referee's blowing penalty in normal competition was too unfavorable for Liaoning team. At the beginning of the game, Zhao Jiwei's layup was double-teamed by Shanxi team members. Zhao Jiwei thought the opponent fouled in the course of defense, but the referee didn't blow the penalty. He protested, but in vain. Then Guo made an obvious foul on the layup, and the referee still didn't decide! Guo is somewhat superior. He went to the referee's theory, but the referee still didn't punish the foul, so he was a little excited and pointed at the referee. The referee's backhand is to give Guo a technical foul, but it's not a big problem. After all, it was Guo who questioned the referee, and Guo himself recognized the penalty, but the controversial place began. Guo complained endlessly after eating a technical foul. To be honest, many people do this when they are angry. After all, Guo thought the other side was fouled, but you didn't blow it. On the contrary, if you give me a T, everyone will be a little angry, not to mention Guo's big temper. But the referee still questioned the penalty and immediately sent me off, technical foul!

This penalty is beyond many people's comprehension. After all, just gave a technical foul! Moreover, the referee's penalty scale also has obvious problems! Anyone who has watched the game should know that Guo's ball was obviously suspected of foul, but there was no penalty. Although Liaoning is ahead, a foul is a foul. The referee is not giving any team face and blowing the penalty to the weak team, but ensuring the fairness and justice of the game! This is what a referee should do.

Recently, CBA's attention has soared because of the referee's problem, which is often a hot spot. My uncle Guo Shiqiang was suspended for five games and fined for questioning the referee and delaying the game. As a result, the referee won, but the referee report given by CBA directly showed that the penalty was wrong, and the penalty that was blown did not blow. This is really a slap in the face! Why is uncle angry? Because this is not an ordinary penalty, this penalty will directly affect the result of the game, so that the whole efforts of the players on the court are in vain! This is not to question your referee. When will the theory be theorized without asking you to judge?

Then the referees Wei and Ye Nan cheated in the exam. A cheating referee, can you expect him to blow the game fairly? Everyone can cheat in the exam. Now I think of all the games he blew up. Is the misjudgment in the game really a problem of referee ability or a personal problem? My little brain can't figure it out. What did you say?/Sorry?