Who is responsible for the revision of the script? _ 1500 words

For a long time, in China film and television industry, it is a controversial topic whether film and television works should be completely loyal to the script. Directors and actors think that the script is just an outline, which can be reasonably imagined, interpreted and freely played according to the script. Playwrights, on the other hand, believe that directors and actors change the plot and lines of the script without the consent of the screenwriter, which is not only an infringement of their own copyright, but also a disrespect for their hard work, which is likely to violate the author's original intention.

The hit historical drama The Legend of Chu and Han released on 20 13 has been controversial since it was broadcast by David. In the scene of rendering Qin Shihuang burn books to bury Confucianism, Confucian scholars collectively read the three-character classic, which violated historical common sense and was criticized by many netizens: The three-character classic was written after the Song Dynasty, so how could people in Qin and Han Dynasties read this book? When netizens bombarded the screenwriter as unprofessional, the screenwriter stood up and exposed the original script on the Internet. People were surprised to find that there was no plot of Confucian scholars reading the three-character classics in the original script, which was temporarily added by the director according to his own understanding. When the director refined the scene, he made such a joke without consulting the screenwriter or related experts.

In our neighboring country, South Korea, it is absolutely not allowed for the director to modify the script without authorization. The screenwriter even has the right to participate in casting with the director, so that the temperament of the actor and the temperament of the role can better fit together. This ensures that there will be no mistakes in historical common sense in historical TV dramas such as Dae Jang Geum. However, it is precisely because of the need to fully respect the original intention of the screenwriter that the director lacks enough creative space and has no right to modify his lines. Korean TV dramas are always very delicate, with long and protracted plots, and the artistic expression of the pictures is slightly thin and insufficient.

Therefore, whether the director and actors modify the script according to the needs of shooting or interpretation, or the screenwriter has the right to modify the script, these two ways can not make a TV series perfect. A good film and television work can only be perfected at all levels of truth, goodness and beauty if the screenwriter, director and actor discuss and participate together.

Things are like chess, and life is like a play. If we regard our social life as a drama, then the script is our social rule. In short, there are three social rules in the world: emotion, reason and law, but the most mandatory and binding is laws and regulations. Therefore, our deputies to the National People's Congress and the makers of administrative regulations are actually the writers of this social drama. They are responsible for extracting emotion and rationality from social phenomena and forming mandatory laws to restrain people's behavior. And our administrators and socialist citizens are the directors and actors of this play: administrators, like directors, pursue better execution effects; Citizens, like actors, hope to better perform their social roles under the constraints of rules. Since the revision of the script needs directors, screenwriters and actors to complete, the revision of the big script of social rules must also involve legislators, governors and socialist citizens, so as to ensure that our laws are more complete and sound and the implementation effect will be better.

In today's China, the formulation and perfection of laws are far from satisfactory. Taking "whether students should be punished by corporal punishment" as an example, education experts, legal experts and deputies to the National People's Congress, as law makers, insist on their own educational values, advocate persuading education methods and do not advocate corporal punishment of students, so "educators are not allowed to punish students by corporal punishment or corporal punishment in disguised form" is written into law; At the executive level, children's nature does not conform to social rules. Sometimes children's cognitive ability is limited, and there is no violent deterrence as the backing. The effect of education is often greatly reduced. Once corporal punishment is implemented, educators can easily touch the edge of the law. In this way, it is difficult for the law to restrain the implementation, and the implementation is often not in accordance with the law. Once the law does not play a role as an explicit social rule, hidden hidden rules will flood.

Let's take another look. How did the British solve the same problem of "whether children should face corporal punishment"? Like experts and scholars in China, British education experts initially insisted on not implementing corporal punishment; However, it was soon found that the existing educational ideas could not be implemented. Therefore, parliamentarians, experts and scholars in the fields of education and law, as well as principals and teachers from the front line of teaching sat together to discuss effective ways to solve the problem: to impose stricter restrictions on corporal punishment and formulate more detailed implementation rules. For example, teachers who have worked for less than three years have no right to punish students; The tools for corporal punishment of students are strictly limited in length, width and materials; Every time before corporal punishment of students, parents and principals should be informed and their consent should be obtained. In this way, they are loyal to the "script" of social life, pursue correct educational ideas and values, make social members as "directors and actors" have a good educational effect at the implementation level, and effectively restrain children's nature of not conforming to social rules.

Britain's way of solving problems has valuable reference significance for China. In a modern democratic country, the revision of the social rules "script" must not be decided by experts and scholars who are "screenwriters", legislators who are "directors" or policy executors alone, but must be the result of joint consultation among "screenwriters", "directors" and "actors". Such policies can not only meet the pursuit of value, but also have practical effects, fully take care of the interests of all parties and make our policies.

Senior three: Lu Hong.