The Lancet criticized the Indian government's response to the epidemic. what do you think?

The British Medical Journal published a report on the ineffectiveness and confusion of the Indian government's response to the epidemic. According to an article in The Lancet, the Indian government led by Modi is responsible for supporting the outbreak of the Indian epidemic, and it is the Indian government's ineffective response to the epidemic that led to the Indian epidemic getting out of control. India did not take active measures to control the epidemic at first, but thought that the domestic epidemic was coming to an end, thus seizing many political and religious opportunities and making the second wave of epidemic in India develop to such a serious degree.

Personally, I think the Indian government should be responsible for the serious epidemic in China. The first reason is that strict epidemic prevention measures have not been implemented. Since the outbreak of the epidemic, the control measures implemented by the Indian government at the beginning have successfully curbed the epidemic, but they have not been relaxed until the end; Secondly, there are many meetings and activities. Before the epidemic was completely controlled, the Indian government held several grand campaign activities for the election, and also let the people hold several grand traditional religious activities, which was an important reason for the outbreak of the epidemic again. Finally, there is no relief material for the people. Since the outbreak of the epidemic in India, the world has given India a lot of international aid, but these international AIDS have not been used by the people. The quantification of India's share conversion needs to be explained.

First, the amount of epidemic prevention is slack. Although at the beginning of the outbreak of COVID-19, India adopted strict control measures and achieved certain results. However, India did not insist on this measure and believed that the epidemic was coming to an end. The neglect and slackness of the epidemic led to the second wave.

Second, hold parties and large-scale activities. During the period when the epidemic was not completely controlled, the Indian government held several large-scale canvassing activities in order to build momentum for the general election. In addition, a large number of people gathered to hold traditional religious activities, which led to the outbreak of the epidemic, and the Indian government was responsible.

Third, international aid materials have not been used by the people. Since the outbreak of the Indian epidemic, the international community has made large-scale donations and assistance to India. However, these materials have not been used by ordinary Indians, and the Indian government's disregard for the people has aroused the indignation of the international community.