The case of eating melon and "stealing" life: If you try to do one thing but not the other, why will you be slapped in the face by the truth?

After the "wrong life change" officially turned into the "stealing change controversy", the information bubble generated by "public opinion eating away the melon" was much more turbulent than the information increase of specific cases. To a certain extent, if the "wrongful exchange of life" stage is the practical process of LGBT rights protection led by the "Guo family" and supplemented by the "Yao family", then the "wrongful exchange of life" stage has completely become the "Yao family" Pictures of "Family" rights protection and "Guo Family" rights protection. As for the hospital level involved, even if it is still the main body responsible for the storm, we must know that in the "wrong life change" stage, although the rights protection of the "Guo family" has had twists and turns, compared with the "Yao family and Yao family", it is generally received media attention. And so fortunately, until the "Wrong Life Change Case" is successfully concluded, it will disappear completely and gradually become a "counterattack of the trial of public opinion"

As far as the "Yao Family" is concerned, they seem to have regained the power of public opinion. Home. Even if "this time" there are still mixed reviews, the overall public opinion market seems to be leaning towards him or her. But what is strange is that even if the "parties" have not yet dug out the path to the truth, the melon-eaters of public opinion have already drawn the map in advance and intervened in the atmosphere of the trial earlier. In this process, various logical relationships are tied up one by one, and the so-called "causal connection" can be found. But unfortunately, the so-called "causal connection" can only enter the sequence of false propositions when all the prerequisites have not been legally certified. Even so, the way of standing aside did not stop, but continued to flood with the shouts of "two families" in the distance.

There is an interesting phenomenon. Those who support the "Yao family" often list many of the rights and wrongs of the "Guo family". They seem to be "self-consistent" and can be irrefutable. Those who support the "Guo Family" can also list many crimes of the "Yao Family", starting from the pros and cons of human nature, or, in short, before the "Yao Family" and "Guo Family" are torn into pieces, "public opinion eats The countdown to the conclusion of the case is approaching. If the case files of the so-called "public opinion eat melon" are really sorted out, it is estimated that several computers will be burned out. It has to be said that in the new media era where "trial by public opinion" is given priority, the so-called onlookers are just "stepping on one's feet".

The "stand on one side and step on the other" approach is universal to a certain extent in the trial of public opinion, in which the core accountability tools are morality and justice. Morality is responsible for execution, and justice is responsible for raising the flag. In short, wherever you go, you must bleed. Even if the specific rights and wrongs are gradually magnified to the extreme, the pain of the person involved will be completely covered up, as if they are abstract people who can be consumed endlessly and even die quickly. And we often see that without the former we dare not force others to charge. They do not participate in actual resistance, but shoot at innocent people like an overseer. This seems to be the norm for public opinion to fish in troubled waters. Although it is often said that "the Internet is not a lawless place", it is impossible to calculate how many fish that have escaped the net are still at large.

Unfortunately, when disorder becomes a means to attract attention, when ruthlessness becomes a reason to ignore bitterness, and when good intentions are covered by an offensive warhead, all morality and justice will become a veritable "hanging". Meat Machine". But what he (she) still doesn’t know is that denying humanity actually means denying one’s own integration into society. In addition, in the category of "eating melons", "neutral" is often regarded as not taking a stand, causing "neutral people" to become the target of public criticism. But in fact, eating melon decently means "neutral". Of course, it is not the existence of MoMo, which means "the matter has nothing to do with oneself, and the matter is high-level", but it can accurately feel the bitterness of the "party" and the infinite scenery of human alienation.

Hume believes that the role of reason is purely instrumental, teaching us to get what we want, including "anger", "desire", "self-satisfaction" and "vanity". The implication is that humans have never been and never will be truly governed by reason. Here, disputes continue indefinitely or occur intermittently, which is a realistic picture. Returning to individual salvation, a relatively rational existence seems to be a necessary condition for happiness. In the final analysis, true compassion is also a two-way fulfillment of oneself. It neither ignores one's own pain nor evades one's own responsibilities in life. In the echo of this realm, I really hope that one of the "Yao Family" and "Guo Family" can be lit up.

At the same time, our era is called the "post-truth era", that is, public opinion and emotion come first, and the specific truth comes later. As a result, the "parties" do not have absolute tolerance and patience, and it is easy to get involved before the truth appears. Crushed by the public opinion bubble. On this issue, both the "Yao family" and the "Guo family" feel the same way. But in terms of past experience, even those who "stand up for one thing and step on another" can guess the answer to the truth, but it is not necessarily an intellectual practice. Because on his or her scale, a person cannot do evil, not because of rationality, but because doing so is not in his or her own interests, leading to the theory of human evil being pushed to infinity.

However, if we really use the theory of "infinite evil in human nature" to face our lives, even moral justice will be bound by interests. In such a realistic picture, people who eat melons may not eat melons for the sake of eating melons, but for a slap in the face. But is this world really what you and I want to see?