Reading is like eating.

At present, after-school service is widely carried out in education, and the key of after-school service is to let students "eat well".

However, how can students "eat well" when reading? In the words of our hometown Tangxi, for example, to "eat enough", it is best to have food to eat and "starve"; In order to "eat well", it is best to have "bad rice" ingredients.

What is "hungry"? That's the proper noun of Tangxi dialect, which means:? Those who are "hungry" can endure hunger; People who "eat evil" can eat evil. Very vivid. How can you tell?

Because in the eyes of Tangxi people, the so-called "starving" food is actually mostly coarse grains. Therefore, if Tangxi people used to work in the mountains and fields, in order to avoid starvation, they often cooked a pot of sweet potato taro or corn to satisfy their hunger, because these foods were "hungry". Correspondingly, the ingredients of "Shapan" should be exquisite and refined, but they are often not delicious. Otherwise, if ordinary families have difficulties in consumption, they will be "unable to eat". Therefore, cooking and seasoning should vary from person to person, keep pace with the times and do what you can. In this way, Tangxi cuisine came into being, such as rotten shepherd's purse rolled with tofu, cooked green beans with taro stalks, egg noodles and so on. I'm not afraid of jokes. When I was a child, because my family was poor, I caught fish in the stream and thought fish soup was the most "evil" meal. It's freezing in the cold, and it feels like "rotten rice" mixed with Chili sauce; It's rare for the production team to kill a cow, scoop up a spoonful of beef soup, and then cook taro. The "hunger" of taro and the "bad meal" of taro soup have the best of both worlds and complement each other, which is unforgettable so far. Why? Think about it, this taro soup is slippery and thin, and the rice is in the stomach at once. Really appetizing! Therefore, it is no wonder that Tangxi has a saying that "taro soup pours rice, you don't report it to your parents". Why don't you report it to your parents? Haha, I'm afraid my parents want to eat too. Of course, this has nothing to do with filial piety, perhaps it is an exaggerated rhetoric that Tangxi people have a special liking for this dish.

Get to the point. Don't digress. Let's go back to the topic of after-school service of education. As a Tangxi person, I compare eating to reading. What I am worried about is whether students can "eat well" and "eat well".

Indeed, after-school service schools should take responsibility, which is a matter of course, but what they are most afraid of is the sequela of "taking it for granted". Imagine, in this teaching activity, if the teacher's "teaching" and the students' "learning" and "eating well" are not well grasped, how can they "eat well"?

Looking at the teacher's side, the implementation of "5+2" after-school service requires a delay of not less than 2 hours per day and an additional 2 hours per day. In addition, teachers have to go to work every morning before parents send their children to school, so the cumulative actual working hours in a week are as many as 6 days. In this way, who will safeguard the fairness of teachers? Of course, teachers, as national public officials, have to endure whether they can "eat" or not in order to take care of the overall situation.

Looking at the students, I don't know whether the "food" or "ingredients" provided by the school are still "starving" or "starving" for the students. And these "foods" or "ingredients" don't know whether they are still to students' taste. If it doesn't taste right, how can you "eat"? In fact, the content of normal classes in schools is students' "dinner", and after-school service is the "snack" that students should choose, which will definitely vary from person to person. Therefore, if the "food" or "ingredients" provided by after-school services make people feel inappropriate, then there must be many other "foragers", because why can't wealthy families meet their children's demand for snacks? So "one-on-one" tutoring appeared, and the fairness and justice of education were broken, and then ordinary families came to compare. Is the educational content still the same? In addition, after-school service may have the original intention of reducing the burden. Yes, the financial burden of parents may be reduced, but the learning burden of students has not been reduced at all. It's a pity to call for so many years to reduce the burden and return to the original point. But if we try to overthrow the mountain of education for a fertility rate, then we will wait and see. Moreover, if "5+2" is implemented, although teachers can take turns, even if they can "eat", aren't they afraid that students will be tired of learning in the long run? At this time, I suddenly felt that our education was like a processing factory. Students are machines and teachers are tools. What a terrible mechanical production! Of course, I'd better worry here!

From this perspective, eating is as important as reading, one is "food is the most important thing for people" and the other is "knowledge changes fate". In our hometown Tangxi, "starvation" means "satiating" in order to satisfy your stomach. "Stupid rice" means "eat well" to satisfy one's appetite. If we understand "having books to read" as "full" and "reading well" as "eating well". Then, in a farming and reading family in Tangxi, eating and reading are exactly the same!

From this perspective, it is all about how to grasp the after-school service and let students "eat well". To achieve comprehensive, systematic and solid knowledge, we must "eat enough"; If you want to learn deeply, understand thoroughly and improve, you must "eat well". From food and clothing to a well-off society, it is also a process of solving "eat well" first and then solving "eat well".

Therefore, reading is like eating. Yuan Mei, a great scholar in the Qing Dynasty, once wrote in Thirteen Volumes of Poems with the Garden: "Those who eat mulberry and spin silk are not mulberry; Bees gather flowers to make honey, not flowers. Reading is like eating. If you eat well, you will have a good spirit. If you eat badly, you will have a sputum tumor. " In Yuan Mei's view, reading should not be "old-fashioned" and not flexible. But to "eat it", use it flexibly, and gain its method.

? From this, we can see that the after-school service we are carrying out is to make students "eat well", whether it is "hungry for food" in Tangxi, my hometown, "reading is like eating" in Yuan Mei's works, or even "governing the country is like cooking small fresh food". This truth is the same!