Examples of culture shock

I found a situation where you can find more of yourself through the Internet. The date of cultural shock in my most disgusting case is that Spencer published it on March 24th, 20 1 1. Smith Author: Spencer Smith London-This week, the London program went to see a popular performance in the West End of Bourne Park. All the comments are very good. It is exciting to see a drama that pays attention to the complexity of racial problems in the United States. The worst part is that I have been to London. This really forced me to look at the London theatre experience from a new perspective. I tried to analyze this specific experience from many different angles, but everyone was as disappointed as before. First of all, let me explain the premise of the play. Claybourn Park specializes in complex competitions and housing. The representative work of American playwright Bruce Norris (1959) tells the story of young families moving to Chicago near all White Bourne Park and the discrimination they face. The resulting drama was written at home in response to Lorraine Hansbury's raisins. Norris's adaptation of fictional events before and after young families entered Claybourn Park. It flaunts a humorous irony and shouts "the most lively performance of the year". However, the carnival bothered me, especially the reaction of the audience. The play begins at 1959, and a couple are going to move out of their home in claiborne Park. Her husband Russell fell into depression and retired during the Korean War. His son died of suicide. Russ is hostile to society because he thinks that when his son was accused of murdering innocent civilians in the war, they rejected him. Bev, Wife is a funny creation, and its exaggerated portrayal of housewives incited a large audience. Not long after, a neighbor came in accompanied by his deaf wife and told Ross and Bev that their house had been sold to a black family. When he mentioned that they were "colors", the nearby priest also went. Xian pointed out, "I believe we use black people" and the whole audience burst into laughter. Neighbors begged Lars to sell the house to the church to prevent it from moving into the family, for fear of domino effect and devaluation of neighborhood value. Once, neighbors and priests sat down, and the black maid and her husband came to ask them how they felt about entering the community. The racial problems of their dancing are all in scenes where the audience seems to find side effects and divisions. Russell obviously doesn't care much about the rejection of neighbors and other members of society. Neighbors will not stop threatening to let black families know about the suicide point upstairs. This will create an ever-changing scene, where the neighbors and priests thrown by Ruth are driven out of their homes. Imitating a deaf-mute speech, the neighbor's wife asked, "What happened?" The crowd broke into laughter again. Sitting in the back row far away from Krystnell, it was absolutely shocking to see the reaction of the audience. Claybourn Park, whose audience is at least 95% white, especially shows the very real and worrying problems of American race and turns it into a performance by black singers in the 20th century. I'm still struggling with how everyone in the theater seems to find humor, American veteran discrimination and the disabled in this blatant racism. This is the most disgusting thing the audience has ever seen. I don't want to completely weaken the play, it's just a response to Britain. The second act is to set the villain in 2009. Actors are playing new roles. A white couple is trying to move into the middle class near Claybourn Park after many years, and recover the same house from crime and drug problems. The couple wanted to tear down and rebuild the new house, but the petition put forward by the neighbors was stopped by the local black couple. Once again, they finished the competition and told some offensive and insulting jokes, which made Rolling burst into laughter, until all this led to another unstable climax, the problem of the audience. I can imagine reading the text in the museum class and benefiting a lot from it. There are good symbols and juxtaposed examples, which provide many opportunities for thinking and analysis. However, endless laughter, I think it is not an appropriate response. If I think their cartoon impression of the play is balanced with some form of reflection, but I have checked some comments from newspapers such as The Guardian and The Observer, and they are all the same, I will know more. They began to use a line to list it as "a fake address for American races" or "the irony of showing little H."