Joke Collection Website - Joke collection - If we want to destroy greed, corruption, evil, kindness, good, bad and so on, my opinion is to destroy the earth. Or war, killing. In fact, the most cruel thing is human beings.

If we want to destroy greed, corruption, evil, kindness, good, bad and so on, my opinion is to destroy the earth. Or war, killing. In fact, the most cruel thing is human beings.

Man is such an animal.

In terms of quantity, at least dozens of people describe and define themselves. The most common is the logical definition of man:

Higher animals evolved from apes can think, make and use labor tools, and can communicate with each other in language.

This is the traditional logical definition of "genus plus species difference", which is a higher animal evolved from the animal kingdom. Its characteristics are thinking, making and using tools and language communication. It is precisely because of the characteristics that other animals do not have that some people think that human beings are "the length of everything".

There are other sayings, such as human-"a half-day envoy, a half-beast", that is, his one foot has entered the territory of human civilization, but his other foot is still in the animal family.

Max scheler, a contemporary German philosopher, thinks that people have two natures: impulse and spirit. The former is inherent in all animals, and it is a spontaneous, formless, directionless, endless and extreme psychological motivation. This irrational core is strikingly similar to Schopenhauer's "will to life", Nietzsche's "strong will" and Bergson's "stretching". The latter (spirit) is the kind of thing that makes people become people. It includes both reason, emotion and will.

Scheler divides all existence into three areas:

First, the field of desire-every aspect of the inorganic world is completely dominated by impulse, slow and lasting, belonging to pure natural impulse, lacking internal, personality and self-restriction. This impulse is the pressure released by the inorganic material world, which has a relatively independent structure, making various forms of existence an objective image;

Second, the field of life-in this field, the initial form is impulse, which is filled and stirred by "life impulse" and is an impulse of self-operation, self-formation and self-differentiation. This life impulse takes feeling as the most primitive and lowest form. What is higher is instinct, with objects and objects, showing powerful effects. The higher form is habit, which has memory, imitation and choice. It is a kind of psychological motivation, which is repetitive and unidirectional. Finally, practical intelligence, as the highest form of life impulse, breaks through the limitations of biology itself and is creative, which is the driving force for people to transition from animals to "real people".

Third, the spiritual realm-this realm is ruled by the spirit, which seems to be the highest principle to distinguish between people and animals.

Scheler's trichotomy is based on the diachronic principle, which shows the inherent characteristics of human evolution. But this division, as a process period, can explain the development from low level to high level. However, this boundary is extremely clear, without crossing and infiltration, and it also denies the inheritance in evolution, which provides the theoretical basis for anthropocentrism and human evolutionary genetics. In fact, people's inner quality is a mixed whole of animality and humanity, barbarism and civilization, and evil and goodness. The former lays the foundation for the latter, that is, I will engage in relevant altruistic behavior only when the latter is beneficial to the former. For example, the "Lei Feng spirit" advocated by our country is something that Lei Feng himself will think carefully before doing everything: even if I do this, I can get spiritual benefits.

Lorenz, an American thinker, found through long-term research that why human beings can't know themselves correctly for a long time? This is because "self-knowledge" has three obstacles:

First, self-esteem. Humans refuse to regard apes as ancestors, so they cannot reveal the biological roots of human nature. People who believe in Christianity, in particular, always think that they are the voters of God, but they are far above the existence of other animals and are the essence of the universe.

Second, human beings want to have their own free will and refuse to accept the ruling of causality. There are very stubborn anti-causal determinism and anti-natural law values in human beings;

Thirdly, modern idealism philosophy embodies human pride: denying innate instinct, improperly propagating human rational spirit, especially romanticism in literature and art, deifying secular desires into pure and noble Lei Feng or Bethune.

Admit that human beings are monkeys, and there is no need to blush; Confirm that the civilization accepted by human beings is acquired, is it more noble than animals? Are planes, cannons and atomic bombs made by scientifically knowledgeable human beings more civilized than animals slaughtering their own kind? The world is full of theft, fraud, conspiracy, plot against each other, mutual loss, jealousy and mass killing, which have never happened in the animal kingdom. It can be concluded that human beings are the most vicious, tyrannical and scheming animals of all animals on earth. Moreover, these brutal acts of human beings are manipulated by their highly developed intelligence, so they are more hidden, cunning and larger than ordinary animals. There are many things that can be summarized as follows:

First, human beings-first of all, they are very aggressive animals. Starting from primitive tribes in ancient times, human beings began to conquer other tribes bloody, which not only happened in a vast space, but also continued the long process of the evolution of the whole primitive clan tribe to national society. Morris said that no animal has fought and struggled for so long as human beings. Every time it attacked and conquered, it not only occupied the territory of foreign tribes by attacking the city and plundering the land, but also took all the wealth and women of the defeated tribes as its own. In other words, there are genes in people's blood that strongly attack others. It is not accurate to say that it is inherited by animals, because the struggle between animals is not only local. After defeating the opponent, the sword will be put in the warehouse and the horse will be placed in the south. No animal has been "preparing for war" or chasing after it for a long time like human beings. What is the reason?

I have observed a large number of phenomena in human behavior, and found that even the acquired behavior with cultural color is influenced by the instinctive impulse of biological inheritance on the one hand, and on the other hand, human beings use their own scientific knowledge as a tool to make the instinctive violence surpass animals. The social organization of human beings is very similar to that of mice. It maintains superficial kindness and restraint in its own ethnic group and group, and once it faces a group that does not belong to it, it immediately shows its devil-like face. This aggressive instinct of human beings not only inherits the aggressive instinct of animals, but also becomes more brutal with the strengthening of scientific tools the day after tomorrow.

Second, animal attacks began to counter moderately. Human attacks are aimed at destroying ethnic groups, not "completely destroying". I have carefully observed the living habits of dogs in my daily life. When a dog meets another unfamiliar dog and shows hostility, both sides make a duel gesture at the same time. After a certain period of confrontation, if one side makes a slight easing gesture, then the other side will give the same response and cancel the confrontation. Even in war, we should have a proper sense of proportion. The strong one drives away the weak one, and there is generally no fatal injury. On the other hand, human beings are different. The party who started the war was not because the other party harmed its own interests, but because it saw fish and meat in other people's bowls and wanted to take possession of the other party's property through killing. And before the war, through a lot of reconnaissance, send spies to know each other, make war plans, use a variety of strategies and tactics, and finally kill each other. Therefore, different from animal fighting, there is a planned, step-by-step and purposeful slaughter between different races of human beings, and it is still a large-scale genocide to attack the city. Among them, relying on advanced technology to invent gas chambers and atomic bombs, the degree of damage is simply many times more advanced than that of animals. However, human beings often create a lot of moral myths about "kindness" and "friendship" for themselves. In my opinion, beautifying and gilding human beings is the biggest scam ever.

Third, animals attack only to protect their own territory or to fill their stomachs. They will never attack rashly if their territory is not threatened and their living materials are not very scarce. We often see some pet dogs urinating under some trees and telephone poles when their owners lead them for a walk. Animal behavioral psychologists believe that this is a sign that the dog uses this place as his own activity space by peeing. When he goes away, he stops this behavior because he can realize that this place is no longer his activity space. Also, dogs are also foraging in their own activity space, and generally do not go to other dog activities to find food. People are very different. On the one hand, attacking the city, plundering the land, subjugating the country and exterminating the species are regarded as the great achievements of military generals, and countless people who praise the war behavior praise the expansion of territory as the "achievement" of political and military leaders, just as we often praise Genghis Khan's Mongolian fighters for sweeping Eurasia as a brilliant feat, and there are many more reasons for waging war than animals. Usually, there is no reason to make up excuses. For example, when Hitler wanted to occupy Poland, he couldn't find a convincing "reason", so he put some death row prisoners who had not been executed by the authorities into the uniforms of the Polish army, blew up the military post on the Soviet-Polish border, and broadcast on the radio that the Polish army had attacked Germany! This created the illusion that the Polish army invaded Germany. After finding the reason, Hitler said: Germany was invaded by the enemy, and I had no choice but to use bombs to deal with bombs! You see, on the issue of war, human beings have smarter actors than animals.

If the struggle between animals is mainly for territory and food, then the cause of human war is more complicated. Among them, many wars in ancient and modern times were caused by wars of different beliefs, and the "Crusaders" in the Middle Ages were the wars in which Christians conquered Islam. The tense confrontation between the two military camps in the last century was actually a struggle between different social systems and ideologies, for some abstract values, and for an abstract symbol. "Hammer sickle" and "Stars and Stripes" have been playing for nearly a century.

Fourth, in raising offspring, human beings are not only irresponsible than animals, but also kill their own offspring. There are many wild cats in the community of Fushan, Qingdao where I once lived. Some kittens are often starved to death because of their large reproduction and limited food, but even so, those skinny female cats will share their food with kittens on an empty stomach. When faced with the danger of foreign attacks, female cats can face animals and people several times or even ten times older than themselves, and they will also grin and dare to attack to protect their children. Every time I see this situation, I am very moved: a kitten can, but people can't. It can often be seen from the media that the phenomenon of abandoned babies, whether in urban or rural areas, is not that mothers are unable to provide food for their children, but that they have maintained their "face" because they are not married. Is there anything more cruel than this? I don't even want my own children for the sake of my moral image. Also, until now, I have never seen an animal mother kill her child. However, there are more and more vicious criminal cases of crazy killings in families of human society, in which parents kill their children; Children kill their parents, some kill their parents. No animal is so heartless and lacks the most basic morality as human beings.

Fourth, human beings are more eager for quick success than animals. There is a proverb that "rabbits don't eat grass beside their nests". I have observed that rabbits and hares generally don't eat grass near their nests, and the reason is not clear. But at least one is for the safety of life; Second, it is really to leave the last rations. But people's behavior can't compare with rabbits. In order to produce food, a large number of cultivated mountainous areas have become barren under the attack of natural forces such as drought and insect pests. In our country, in order to "catch up with Britain in 15", all the trees in the village are cut down to make fuel for steelmaking. For the sake of GDP growth, they sacrificed blue sky and clear water, and even destroyed their homes.

Fifth, animals can get along well without being threatened by other species, while humans treat unfriendly aliens by chopping and killing, and treat the same kind for our own use. Once there is disharmony, they will all be eliminated. Look at the scene in the zoo. Different kinds of animals are kept in a big cage, and there is no killing each other. However, human society has been full of bloody massacres for thousands of years. Even a friendly neighbor will make up many reasons to destroy it when it is no longer useful. For the same kind, it is to use the intrigue of the unity part, the division part and the attack part. Finally, after destroying all opponents through division and disintegration, there is only one single thief left. From the historical records of our country to Zi Zhi Tong Jian, we can see that China is not only a history of struggle with other nationalities, but also a history of struggle with his roommates. Among them, those ambitious people, schemers, traitors and traitors are ruthless butchers. What kind of animal can compare with the bloody cases and crimes they have committed?

Thousands of years of human history is a history of constantly creating evil, but it is also a history of constantly winning brilliant victories. Dear friends, look at those animals controlled and imprisoned by human beings. How tragic their fate is! Tens of millions of chickens and pigs are slaughtered by humans every day. Originally, these chickens and pigs are free animals in nature. When they are used by humans, it takes several months from birth to death. They died tragically after being chewed by human teeth. In particular, in order to obtain bear bile and sika deer antler, human beings cruelly extracted bile from bears and tortured them to death; The cut velvet antler is red and bloody, but the operator of velvet antler is working happily. They never thought about how much the innocent deer suffered.

In my hometown, a cow raised by the production team was too old to get sick, so the village decided to kill it. It was a winter afternoon, and in the afterglow of the sunset, which cow was tied under a big willow tree, with tears in her eyes, and a middle-aged farmer was grinding a butcher knife on a nearby millstone. There is a circle of people standing around. When the "executioner" came to the cow with a butcher's knife on the ground, the cow wanted to stand up, but she didn't have the strength to stand up. It just screamed a few times in despair and was stabbed into the heart by a butcher knife ... whenever I think of this story of killing cows, I always shed tears and brutally killed the cows that have dedicated their lives to mankind. What could be more cruel than this?

Human beings are so selfish, greedy and tyrannical towards all creatures in the world. It can be said that human beings have done many unnatural things since they left the animal kingdom. Even so, human beings are not satisfied with their own desires. It is said that it is going to March into areas that have not been broken by human beings, but it is actually continuing this barbaric massacre. However, just like a murderer who often kills people, he is very familiar with his profession and has become numb to his evil deeds. He did not reflect on his daily slaughter activities, but praised them with all praise words, which were written into novels and poems by writers. A paper written by thinkers on the necessity of slaughter; It has been written by economists as a calculation of harvest income; This is written by a strategist, who enjoys attacking the city. ....................................................................................................................................................................

Then, human beings have obtained a lot of living materials from nature and society. Is it enough? Now get down to business, and then the German philosopher Schopenhauer analyzes life to see how greedy and cruel human beings are! After reading Schopenhauer's The Trouble of Love and Life, my first instinct is: Perhaps human beings are the most unsuitable animals to live on the earth. It is precisely because of human existence that a large number of species are extinct, a large number of different species are killed, the air is destroyed, the water quality is polluted, and there are wars, cancers, and countless life and death situations. On the one hand, people build tall buildings, cook delicious food and wear gorgeous clothes, but they still can't hide their arrogant ambitions-they are making a large number of atomic bombs and hydrogen bombs, which will be released one day. When all the creatures on the earth are destroyed, the world at that time is truly "nothingness".

I really can't find any reason to be optimistic about the future of mankind.