Why did the video of Chizuru Ueno chatting in the Peking University dormitory arouse ridicule?

What exactly is feminism? Is marriage that important to women? Does higher education mean higher cognition? A recent video of Chizuru Ueno chatting in a Peking University dormitory has caused a lot of controversy, and can even be said to be ridiculed.

First of all, let’s briefly understand the background of the characters and the whole conversation:

Chizuru Ueno is a famous Japanese sociologist, a pioneer, leader and leader in the fields of women’s studies and gender studies. Theorist, Emeritus Professor at the University of Tokyo. Many of her books are best-sellers in China, such as "Misogyny", "Starting at the Limit: Feminist Letters" and so on.

The "Peking University Dormitory Chat" is a series of videos created by three up owners who have graduated from Peking University ten years ago, live in the same dormitory, and claim to be feminists.

Then the question is, such a conversation seems to be very profound and valuable for discussion, but why does it trigger ridicule?

Actually, the focus of group ridicule is mainly on the up "Quan Hee Hee". First of all, at the beginning of the conversation, she asked a very "sharp" question that was even called "rude" by netizens, that is, she asked Ueno Chizuru why she was unmarried and infertile, "Is it because she has been hurt by a man?" "Is it because of the influence of the original family?" including later asking "Is there a moment of falling in love?" They are all very classic questions, very similar to the words used by relatives when urging marriage: "Why don't you fall in love? Are you waiting for a man?" "Why don't you get married? Have you been hurt by a man?" "Why don't you have children? Is there something wrong with your body?" These questions seem very low-level and superficial in a conversation that has been defined as a "high-level" one.

Secondly, there is the Ningba in "Quan Xixi"'s self-report. She claims to be a feminist, but her actions seem to go against her original intentions. She was afraid of the judgment of her relatives and friends in her hometown, so she chose to get married before the age of 30; as a DINK couple, in order to prevent her husband from cheating, she compromised and had children; she could not refuse her husband's unreasonable request...so this seems to be a problem. It was her husband who truly "lived for himself", but her life was full of compromises and compromises, but it became extremely awkward because of the cloak of feminism. Even using "flawed feminism" to rationalize these forces is like what Chizuru Ueno said, "fooling yourself."

As a result, it triggered even greater ridicule:

This is a vicious question posed by three spoiled wives to anti-marriage advocates. A dialogue between a brain and three wombs. This up Can a husband who has been working tirelessly to promote Peking University for ten years after graduation be considered a graduate of Peking University? He really smeared the highest university and acted condescendingly throughout the whole process. Where did this arrogance come from...

? There are endless negative comments, but is this the fact? But I think what should be considered more is that even girls who graduated from Peking University will still choose to compromise under various social pressures, and even cannot eradicate the deep-rooted things about the relationship between men and women in their minds, and will use arrogance to do so. Seeing women who are different from themselves and excusing "men's rights". So under such a social background and conceptual understanding, how many people can truly stick to themselves?

And feminism is not limited to marriage and love, nor is it only men and women in marriage who are unequal. It can only be said that discussion is necessary, and there is still a long way to go to realize true feminism.