Joke Collection Website - Cold jokes - If Zhang Yining comes to fight against Ito Miki today, what are the chances of winning?

If Zhang Yining comes to fight against Ito Miki today, what are the chances of winning?

In the era of small ball, the rotation of the ball was strong, and Ito Meicheng's hitting was limited. Zhang Yining's winning rate was about 6%.

Before Miyoshi Ito, the No.1 singles player of the Japanese women's team was Fukuhara Ai. For "Love Sauce", Zhang Yining is almost the biggest pain in her whole career. In order to avoid Fukuhara Ai swallowing eggs, Zhang Yining had to use "serve suicide" to make points. But Miyoshi Ito's lethality is higher than Fukuhara Ai's. How will she win or lose the match with Zhang Yining in the era of small ball (4mm)?

1. referring to Zhang Yining's nemesis, Jiang Huajun, Ito has the highest winning rate of 4%. It is said that Zhang Yining's defense is the "Tiananmen Wall", and no one can penetrate her defense, but is this really the case? In fact, Zhang Yining is most afraid of raw rubber. Many fans think that Zhang Yining is too strong to have an opponent, but she has swallowed five consecutive defeats against Jiang Huajun. Jiang Huajun used to be a member of the former national team, and also went out of Li Sun with Zhang Yining. His backhand hitting power can be comparable to that of male athletes. Fukuhara Ai's strength is hard to penetrate Zhang Yining, but Jiang Huajun's backhand can easily "penetrate" Zhang Yining's defense.

Miyoshi Ito's hitting power is greater than Fukuhara Ai's, but less than Jiang Huajun's, while her speed and angle of continuous hitting are higher than those of two people, and the power of forehand slamming is also shine on you's. If Zhang Yining plays Ito, the speed of Ito Meicheng's backhand can be limited by increasing the rotation on the 4mm ball. Just as she used "spin" to restrain Fukuhara Ai, Ito has a 4% chance of winning the competition under Zhang Yining. But if it is a 4+ ball, the relationship between the two will be reversed. In the era of Big Ball, the rotation was obviously weakened, and it was difficult for Zhang Yining to resist Ito's offensive by defense. Ding Ning was beaten 11- < P > Zhang Yining, Ding Ning and Zhu Yuling were both defensive styles. The foundation of this style of play lies in the stalemate by increasing the number of "rotation". Because the number of defensive boards of three people is too thick and solid, it is easy for general offensive players to make mistakes when they attack more than seven or eight boards. However, in the big ball era (4+), the rotation was obviously weakened, which made the foundation of defensive play shake. Therefore, in the face of raw rubber, Ding Ning was beaten 11- and Zhu Yuling was defeated twice.

1. Ito's exaggerated serve will confuse Zhang Yining. Without the amulet of "rotation", it will be difficult to move. Ding Ning and Zhu Yuling, such as Sun Yingsha and Chen Meng, can also make full use of their strength if they are facing the double-sided anti-glue arc combined with fast break, but at most, the other side can't keep up after speeding up the pace. However, playing the raw rubber like Ito is completely helpless: first of all, the arc of the ball hit by the raw rubber bomb is low and the ball sinks. This kind of ball needs you to pull it up by strength, instead of using the force to defend it like playing the reverse rubber; This is not the strength of Zhang Yining, Ding Ning, Zhu Yuling and others; Second, in the big ball era, after losing the foundation of increasing the "rotation" layer to entangle with opponents, the speed and strength of raw rubber can be completely released.

Ito's backhand and forehand bursts are almost the whole bombing mode. Third, when Zhu Yuling was defeated by Ito for the second time, he ate 14 serves from Ito. All the opponents of Guoping gradually adapted from "eating too much" to "eating too little". It's not that you won't eat Ito's serve after playing once or twice. Zhang Yining didn't take Ito's changeable and strange serve, and she didn't have the upper hand in receiving it. Furthermore, Ito's current bouncing loops are all pulled by male athletes. With the strength of Zhang Yining's pulling the ball to counterattack, it is not a big threat to Ito.

there is no comparability! It's a question to ask Ip Man or Guo Jing who is good!

This question is totally untrue. First of all, we know that Zhang Yining and Miki Ito are not athletes of the same era!

and most importantly, although Zhang Yining and Miki Ito were both excellent athletes of their time!

But table tennis in Zhang Yining's era has not changed the ball, both in speed and stalemate, which is much slower than now. In Zhang Yining's era, it was very important to play the spin. As long as the spin can be pulled out, no matter how fast it is, it is useless!

However, in this era of Miyoshi Ito, table tennis has been changed into a 4+ plastic ball. The rotation is greatly weakened, but the speed has become very fast!

As a result, a number of athletes who made heroes in the times, such as Miki Ito, Chen Meng, Sun Yingsha and Manyu Wang, were all beneficiaries after changing the ball!

especially Miki Ito, her style of play is forehand reverse rubber and backhand raw rubber, which relies on speed, that is, raw rubber hits a ball that is emasculated and heavy, giving her opponent a fatal blow!

Although Zhang Yining's defensive counter-attack was very good, there were almost no opponents at that time.

But Zhang Yining and Miki Ito are completely different. As I said before, it is the same as asking Ip Man and Guo Jing who is better and who is better.

Although both of them are masters in their own time, the techniques and equipment they practice are totally different.

you can definitely play a dozen, but I don't think there is much comparability!

I don't know if you still remember that in the Asian Championships, Yang Ying asked Deng Yaping during the explanation, if it was Zhang Yining, could you seal Sun Yingsha's ball?

But Deng Yaping didn't say anything or give any advice. I think Deng Yaping has expressed it. She also thinks that she is not an athlete of an era at all, and there is nothing to compare with!

I saw some people say that Zhang Yining retired because he didn't have an opponent. Some people believe this. If you don't cheat in the semi-final of the Zhang Yining National Games, it is very likely that you won't make it to the final. If you don't know, you can search the video of that year's game. Ito's play is really like Zhang Yining's and Zhang Yining's, and it is a balance between offensive and defensive. It is a two-sided arc play, stable but not fierce. Ding Ning and Zhu Yuling all belong to this play. Ding Ning lost to Ito -11. At that time, Zhang Yining was afraid of Jiang Huajun, and Jiang Huajun was also a speed player, such as Ito, who shot backhand and played forehand. Zhang Yining ran into an enhanced Jiang Huajun.

This is a joke. Now Zhang Yining can only play amateur games. How to beat Ito? It's hard to say whether Zhang Yining can win Ito at the peak, after all, two people are not the same age.

It's not that Zhang can't win. If Zhang can recover his physical fitness and physical condition, he will be trained systematically, strictly and professionally at the national level. At the same time, he will have to train for at least half a year with the national team in active service.

I think if we put the two men in the same generation, Zhang Yining will still win, and the winning face will be very big, because Zhang Yining is not only well defended, but also her attack is not as bad as some fans take it for granted, but she has a strong attack, just because the defense is too strong, others will return the ball with poor quality or lose points by their own mistakes after playing a few boards. It is a joke for an athlete of her level to say that her attack is not enough, and she has so many. How lonely invincible is!

As for Ito, although she has a strong point, that is, she has many changes and high speed, and backhand hitting is a unique skill, her shortcomings are also obvious. She is too short and lacks the ability to protect the platform, so she can't open the angle. China's players beat her, which is mostly the case. Besides, she can only play with the wind. Once she enters the stalemate stage, she will hit wildly and often upset herself.

It's inevitable that Zhang, as the top representative of table tennis at that time, won't be able to compare it in a time and space, and he won't take advantage of Chen Meng's Sun Yingsha, Liu Shiwen and others. But if the two men are playing against each other now, Zhang Diaoda, who has retired for many years and stayed away from training, has no problem. I am afraid that the odds against professional Ito are very low.

Zhang Yining era was a small ball, and the loop ball was very advantageous, but the speed of the small ball could not be improved. Zhang's defensive ability was very advantageous. If in that era, Zhang Yining should be able to defend Ito. Now it's a big ball, focusing on speed and strength. Zhang Yining's defense should be very difficult. Furthermore, no matter what goes on with time, it is the same with sports competition. Now the level of athletes is generally higher than in the past, unless the track and field sports with pure physical strength play the human limit at a certain moment. Of course, it is unrealistic to compare different rules in different times, and it is inaccurate to compare them by theory. I can only express my opinion: Ito now returns to Zhang Yining era with his current technology to fight Zhang Yining, with a 55-5 win, and the odds are a little better (this is based on the comparison of the winning percentage between Zhang Yining and Wang Nan, and Wang Nan is also a strength type). On the other hand, Zhang Yining is expected to be hanged. Again, it is not accurate to compare with the theory. China team has always been better than the Japanese team at the same time. If they really switch eras at their peak, they will change their training methods according to the technology and rules of the current era. If this comparison is made, Zhang Yining is estimated to be dominant. It's just a theoretical comparison. Just have a look.

Why do people always ask such boring questions? Besides, with the current achievement of Ito Meicheng, it can't be compared with Zhang Yining, the winner of "Double Slam". If we cross time and space, Zhang Yining will inevitably abuse Ito Meicheng and refuse to accept the argument!

it's meaningless to say these things! I only know that Zhang Yining's dominance in table tennis was just now. As long as she was there, there was no other option for the champion! Ito can't even pass Chen Meng, Sasha and Manyu Wang now, let alone compare with Zhang Yining of that era. Let's talk about this comparison again when she rules table tennis!