Which is better, an 80-level warlock or a hunter?

There are similarities and differences between these two occupations.

The same thing is that they are not the "pro-sons" of Blizzard, but the difference is that the emphasis is different.

As far as Pve is concerned, it is difficult to find hunters except shamans, and all kinds of 25icc are also scarce. The misleading of hunters and the unique existence of long-range physical injuries are irreplaceable by any profession. That's a joke. Like concentration, thieves don't steal from other professions. What all kinds of high-end teams want most is a powerful hunter. Cloth armor for equipment is also easier to take.

Warlocks are also indispensable for a mature team. Latin people are magical! But in terms of output alone, hunters are superior to warlocks, and the most important thing is the difficulty of obtaining equipment. Mages, warlocks, and dark priests are all eyeing the fast-explosive equipment. Do newcomers need to bring foreign objects? Wait for five.

As for PVP, hunters are very common. Although death and silence are provided, they still want to hug their thighs. I won't talk about this disgusting phd combination. It's hard to hear. I can defeat 80% hunters in the iron gate with dark grazing only once according to plague and fear in 23 seconds. PVP has its own strength. If you want to play high, you still have to hug Pal, Hunter, Dk and DK's thighs (PHD).

Warlocks are much better, and the rise and destruction of pain are very strong. Remember that sentence, "A mage is not as good as a warlock's dog", and various film teams, 2346 is a paradise for warlocks to play. After the sacrifice on the battlefield, it broke out and was leveraged.

To sum up, if it's leisure, it's recommended that hunters, large and small copies are indispensable, no one will rob you (enhanced shamans are rarer than dwarf aunts and knights, and now DK provides BUFF), and your baby is happy, not to mention the warlock's baby, which is a slave and has no affection.