Joke Collection Website - Cold jokes - The last survivor, number two, received mixed reviews. The plot discussion is polarized.

The last survivor, number two, received mixed reviews. The plot discussion is polarized.

Information:

Kotaku, a foreign game media who had previously evaluated The Last Survivor 2, thought that this score could not reflect any real situation, and wrote an article to refute this phenomenon.

The following is the full text of Kotaku's article:

Basically, after the game was officially released, the evaluation on Metacritic came out immediately. But most of the games encountered were obviously bombed by bad reviews. Obviously, the game is not over yet. When you don't know the actual situation, you come to the bad review. Forbes pointed out that half a day after the game was officially released, 5,000 user comments were accumulated: "Unless these players try their best to get through customs at the highest speed, and then immediately release 0 bad reviews, things are obviously fishy." Now the game has just been on sale for two whole days, which is really enough for the core players to clear customs, but for most games, the players who clear customs so quickly are definitely a minority. Therefore, these 0-point bad reviews are given by players who have never passed the test or even played the game.

Why is the last survivor 2 hated? As early as 20 18 E3, a video game showing lesbian love was released, and there were many critical voices, euphemistically saying, "This game is political propaganda. This is a politically correct statement, not a game at all. " Welcome to attack production director NeilDruckmann directly.

There are also some well-founded bad reviews, such as complaining about the loopholes in the game plot and the failure of characterization. "It's a pity that this sequel ruined the reputation of the previous work", "As long as it passes the customs, it is completely meaningless" and "the story is completely insulting to the role".

Although bad reviews account for the vast majority at present, they are rated 800 and praised 8500. The reason for the praise is "unparalleled facial expressions, incredible levels and sound effects design, and first-class image quality, making this game the most beautiful game world so far." The plot is both shocking and true. "

In contrast, the PS4 version of Radiation 76 has a media rating of 53 and a user rating of 2.8, with a total of 460 1 users giving comments. However, the media score of "Ode to the Disaster Scene" was 54, and the user score was 3.5. 1268 users participated in the evaluation. In earlier mass effect 3, the media score was 93, the user score was 5.7 and the number of participating users was 192 1. It is worth pointing out that the scores collected by Metacritic Station are all media that give numerical scores. For example, Kotaku and Polygon no longer give specific numerical scores, but only make qualitative recommendations or lightning protection.

Regardless of how many of those bad reviews have never played the game and how many really think the game sucks, there is at least one clear fact: the gap between the media rating and the user rating is too big. Metacritic's own mechanism has hidden dangers. It is too easy for users to bombard with bad reviews, and the final comprehensive score may have a great impact on the work itself and the creator of the work.

Although the score for evaluating the quality of a game looks very quantitative, reliable and scientific. But in fact, this score can no longer reflect the various influences of the network environment itself. Now, what happened to the last survivor 2? On the one hand, some people will say that media ratings are paid for, on the other hand, users will say that cyber mobs are committing cyber violence. As a result, the original platform for users to consult whether to buy or not fell into a crisis of trust, and the credibility of the rating began to be questioned, making it difficult to decide which point to believe.

Just like the torn American society, the specific views expressed are no longer important. What matters is which team you stand on. After standing in the team, you will know the enemy and me clearly, with extreme views and actions. As a player who just wants to play a stand-alone game quietly, he may only trust his own judgment and have to take the risk of not liking when buying the game.

Perhaps more valuable is that each player's own independent judgment is not affected by rhythm and external events. Perhaps this is the greatest objectivity and respect we can do.

Bian Xiao has something to say:

As a player without a host, Bian Xiao also went to the cloud for the first time to watch the second episode of Beauty and relive the plot of the first episode. To tell the truth, the plot of the second episode is not so ugly, and it is good in the setting of plot conflict. The second woman killed Joel because she had her own hatred, and she was willing to give everything to the other second benefactor who saved her after revenge. Combined with her background at that time, she just didn't want to believe in the split personality of her teammates. Everyone's criticism of the role is unnecessary. All out of anger at Joel's death. She escaped this anger, did not wear colored glasses, and did not dig people like zombies. Beauty 2, as a game work, is still very good, but it certainly doesn't reach full marks.