Are you sad if the teacher makes you stand still?

Teacher, being forced to stand has traumatized my soul. My lawyer wants to interview you!

Shi Dao has been given an authoritative status by people in the process of shaping others and influencing society, although this status is often a spiritual belief. The Education Law stipulates the authority of teachers in the form of legal provisions. There is no dignity in the vulgar way of teaching. Teachers without academic freedom can only follow the secular philosophy of "doing more is worse than doing less".

Most of today’s teachers are kind. When parents ask about their children’s condition, the responses they receive are often “very good” and “no problem.”

Primary and middle school teachers still have concerns to some extent. They are afraid that if they talk too much, students will not be able to bear it and parents will complain. If the media exposes it again, let alone performance appraisal, they will be dismissed if it does not work well.

In class, the teacher was really annoyed and made the students stand in anger, which sometimes led to unexpected disasters.

A case in 2018 caused quite a stir in China. A female teacher in a certain primary school exercised her "right to be punished" because her students were late. The parent of the student who was punished was the deputy director of the local police station. He sent people directly to arrest the teacher, detained him, and released him seven hours later.

A student was punished to stand, which resulted in violence against the teacher!

In the context of governing the country according to law, current education seems to lack the protection of academic freedom and teacher authority.

Article 29, Paragraph 4 of the "Education Law" stipulates: (Schools and other educational institutions shall exercise the following rights) to manage the student status of educated persons and implement rewards or sanctions.

The right to discipline mentioned here can be regarded as the power of teachers and schools to discipline students. However, the legal provisions do not clearly stipulate the conditions, methods, scope, etc. for the implementation of disciplinary power, nor do they stipulate the consequences of the abuse of disciplinary power in education.

Will there be a day when the dignity of a teacher is challenged like this: "Teacher, being forced to stand has traumatized my soul, and my lawyer wants to interview you!"

What if? What’s the point of education if you lose the right to punish students?

The teachings of teaching, receiving karma, and solving doubts have actually been given more or less authoritative status by people in the process of shaping others and influencing society. In other words, we accept in our hearts that teachers have a higher social status than the public, although this status is often a spiritual belief.

The "Education Law" stipulates the authority of teachers in the form of legal provisions on this basis.

This authority gives teachers a high degree of freedom within the academic scope. In British schools, teachers are not subject to administrative interference in their academic and teaching unless it violates laws or school rules. Teachers do not need to flatter the school, nor do they need to flatter students and parents.

There is no dignity in the vulgar way of teaching.

Teachers without academic freedom follow the secular philosophy of "doing more is worse than doing less", and therefore gradually become less truthful or less truthful.

Without academic freedom and lack of teacher authority, can our education still have credibility?