"Help or not" and the lack of social integrity

There is a sketch program "Help or Not" in the Spring Festival Evening of the Year of the Horse, which is based on the reality of "Help or Not" when the elderly fall in their lives. There are both the psychological entanglement of contradictions between the parties and the moral torture of passers-by. The lines are humorous and philosophical, especially at the end of the sentence, "If a person falls, he can still get up;" People's hearts have fallen, and I can't help if I want to help. " Because it is directed at social hotspots, it delivers positive energy in hilarious spit, which is highly praised by the audience. There are also countless viewers who expressed the same confusion as in the sketch. "If you really encounter it, it is really a problem to help or not."

Indeed, in this country where people get old before they get rich, the elderly often enter the public eye and become the focus of hot discussion, because they are a group that is easy to degenerate. I was supposed to help the old man who fell to the ground, but wait a minute. Between helping and not helping, China people are suffering mentally: help, if the old man blackmails (lies) and you are knocked down, it will be "unbearable", and a kind and warm-hearted person who is willing to help others will get into trouble; I can't help it. Seeing an old man lying on the ground groaning in pain in front of him, I feel sorry for myself and my conscience is uneasy ... It's not without lessons. There are Peng Yu in Nanjing, Xu Yunhe in Tianjin, three children in Dazhou, Sichuan, and Wu Dage who committed suicide to prove his innocence because he was blackmailed to save the elderly in Heyuan, Guangdong. It is precisely because of the frequent phenomenon of "blackmail" that helping the elderly with kindness has become a high-value technical activity in today's streets. Therefore, in September of 20 1 1, the Ministry of Health at that time had to issue the Technical Guide for the Elderly's Fall Intervention, and Shi Shusi, a senior media person, wrote an article entitled "1300 million people can't help a fallen old man".

/kloc-0.3 billion people can't help an old man who fell. What is the causal relationship behind it? People all refer to China people's moral decline and lack of integrity. The author thinks that, as seen today, public order and good customs are declining, and the fine tradition of helping others is declining. Especially in the tide of market economy, citizens' morality has declined sharply and social integrity is seriously lacking, which is really worrying.

Honesty, as the credit guarantee for the interaction between social subjects, is the guarantee for the healthy operation of a society. The integrity of a society determines the running state of this society. With regard to the current credit problem in China, some media articles pointed out that with the changes in social structure in recent years, the social credit situation in China is not only getting worse and worse, but even extremely bad in some aspects, which has become a remarkable social problem. This statement is by no means alarmist, judging from the credibility crisis behind the inability of1300 million people to help a fallen old man.

Then, who caused the lack of social integrity? In other words, who is the criminal leader who leads to the lack of social integrity?

Let's take a look at some social credit situations in China in recent years: from enterprises defaulting on the wages of workers and migrant workers to charitable organizations misappropriating and squandering donations, from plagiarism of academic elite papers by university professors to frequent scandals in academic and cultural highlands such as the Palace Museum, all of which show that the social credit situation in China is not optimistic. This also includes the serious corruption of government officials and the abuse of public power. The phenomenon of dishonesty in other governments is more common, which aggravates the decline and loss of social integrity. In addition, some local government departments have a weak sense of honesty and lack continuity and stability in their policies. While blindly pursuing economic development, it has not really benefited the society and the people, and even competed with the people by monopolizing resources and power. Such problems have seriously damaged the integrity of the government, so that in many social hot events, people (netizens) always habitually "spit" at the first time.

Many years ago, in the village where the author lived, the town government encouraged farmers to develop greenhouse vegetables under the banner of thinking for farmers. The villagers were worried that vegetables would spill on farmers, so they stopped planting them. The government encourages them to come to the town government if the price of peppers and eggplant is lower than 1.6 yuan/kg, and collect as much as they have. The farmers developed confidently and boldly. At that time, farmers planted peppers and eggplant, but the market price was only 34 cents per catty. Helpless, farmers had to pick peppers and eggplant to the town government, but the town government broke its promise and drove them out. Farmers really want to cry. Also, it is also the town government. At the beginning, a prize was issued to collect street names, and the public responded positively. When the street name was announced, the reward list was not announced. Perhaps the town government never wanted to reward the applicants, but just fooled the public into participating actively.

There is no doubt that the lack of social integrity is the chief culprit leading to the moral decay of the whole society and the disorder of social and economic order, while the lack of government integrity is one of the primary factors leading to the widespread dishonesty in the current society. It can be seen from the fact that the town government has broken its promise to the people that the government's breach of promise is the most destructive and exemplary "virus" among many social phenomena. "fish begins to stink at the head", government integrity runs through the whole interactive relationship between the government and the public. The lack of government integrity will lead to a series of chain reactions of "dishonesty".