Art and Entertainment

Thinking about this topic is to appreciate Liang Bo's performance on the stage.

Many literary and art workers, on the one hand, try their best to cater to the market, on the other hand, they have to erect monuments to themselves. Is this art? Or entertainment?

Art, tracing back to the source is a skillful skill. However, contemporary art has become synonymous with sacredness and nobility. Even if an amateur dabbles in an art or seems to have an artistic style, he is inexplicably sought after. But pure art, it is just a proficient craft, the so-called pursuit and pressure, the embarrassment of not knowing is that those who know themselves know a little more or less.

In the final analysis, art itself is only suitable for appreciation, and what is most worthy of appreciation is not art itself. On the contrary, in this hopeless and ethereal real world, the personality of artists who persistently pursue art, although some artists are purely from the heart, are not disturbed by hopelessness at all.

Never mind, this just proves that artists are lying on solid land in various ways, not so-called high-energy gods. They also shit and pee, eat with clothes on, and lie down when they are sleepy. Unfortunately, many artists have done negative things.

"Entertainment is fun" (from the interpretation of Shuowen, the "fun" of entertainment here is meaningless). Entertainment in modern Chinese can be interpreted as: happiness or making people happy. Appreciating art can bring happiness as well as entertainment.

As far as entertainment is concerned, the threshold of entertainment is much lower than art, regardless of the contemporary environment. Children in kindergarten can tell jokes and have a good time. This is the fun of entertainment. Taking a bath in the morning, enjoying beautiful natural creations, sitting quietly and enjoying sweet songs are all just for the sake of happiness. In ancient times, the entertainment in the country of etiquette was elegant entertainment. Nowadays, entertainment is what the public needs, and it has changed from elegance to elegance. How can you say it's lucky?

Contemporary entertainment is not only lucky, but also wrapped in layers of derogatory meanings. This point can also be described by a practical example: is it good or bad for literary and art workers to cater to the market? My personal opinion is that there is no such thing as pandering, and there is no distinction between good and bad. Another example is used to illustrate: I have been doing all kinds of promotion work for three or four years. Blogging should have a good orientation, make some headlines to promote clicks, occasionally rub a hot spot, and write some articles to cater to the tastes of the audience. Everything should be created for powder absorption. But this is not the case.

In addition to expressing, it is enough to please readers. If we engage in some activities and gimmicks that cater to the original sin, even the title party will have more forwarding and reading, and my expression will be seen by more people. This is not a happy thing. But I am not willing to do it, although I am eager to be read by more people. I have the pleasure of expression, and I am the only one who is happy enough. In other words, I entertain and make myself happy first.

The opposite of making yourself happy is to make others happy. What's wrong with making people happy Normal and noble! This involves an essential question-why should people be happy?

Entertainment is a way to make a living. Of course, there are many ways to make a living, such as selling vegetables, selling prostitutes and selling traffic. As long as you are willing to do it, you can't earn money for eating! ! The reason why a steady stream of people follow the pan-entertainment model to make a living (that is, please others) is that they can achieve profiteering, vanity and other purposes in addition to simply making a living. This shows that pure interest orientation and contemporary entertainment will only make others happy.

People who insist that life is meaningless have many hedonistic factors in vain. And some people's views I agree with very much: let yourself be happy first, and then let others be happy when conditions permit, so that life will be complete. Obviously, the premise of this sentence is by no means to make money in other people's pockets. Therefore, big data teaches enterprise traffic to be realized, at least I can't. I'm just happy to express myself. There's nothing wrong with such entertainment.

Articles don't have to be enlightening. If there is anything to sum up, I think it is to clarify the essence of art and entertainment. Everyone needs happiness. Happiness can come from entertainment or art. Can I entertain readers and let them add powder? Can I entertain my customers and make them spend? I am doing the work of pleasing others every day, but I am crouching in the corner waiting to be pleased. No!