Degang Guo took part in this program, saying that talking about money hurts feelings. What do you think of this?

After watching the PK of Slag and Liu Siwei, the host said that the two groups were fighting for the position of the last graduation exhibition. This is to tell the audience that this stage of activities is over. However, there is a phenomenon that makes editors who like comedy a little curious and fresh. As we all know, there has always been a saying in China's comedy circle that the core of comedy is tragedy. Everyone knows that the original author of this sentence is Mr Peisi Chen. However, in this episode, he actually denied what he said before. This incident occurred after three lecturers commented on Cao He's Old Story of the Liyuan.

Indeed, as Peisi Chen and Ying Da commented, this work is not only shocking, but also lacks many jokes. Ying Da said the job was pathetic. Peisi Chen said more directly, "you are at the wrong door. You should sign up for the gold medal tragedy class. When we are together, we feel too heavy. This feeling is too heavy to bring to work, which is a constraint for us. Things will affect our comedy expression. " When Peisi Chen said a few words, I immediately remembered the famous proverb: "The core of comedy is tragedy". At this point, the editor is a little confused. Peisi Chen, judging from the comments just now and the famous sayings before, which one should we believe? It can be said that I agree with the sentence in Peisi Chen's annotation. Comedy was originally an interesting thing, but what should I do with that famous saying? Confused! This is also an evaluation of Cao: learn to eat first, and then learn to support the family.

If we learn to eat first, our burden will be heavy; Then we will learn to support our families. After health, we will discuss ideology. In fact, Degang Guo's words are the most straightforward. The editor summed it up as follows: Talking about the emotional burden, the burden is not big, what to eat? It can be said that Degang Guo's concept of comedy is consistent, but Peisi Chen's concept is obviously inconsistent, so it is difficult for editors to understand. Ok, let's talk about the comedy of this question. I have already talked about Cao Yangyang's "Old Things in the Pear Garden", so I won't go into details. Strictly speaking, this is not a real comedy. ?

So, what is left is the work of these four groups of students. Let's talk about stray cats and stray dogs by Han Yunyun. The form and theme of this work are very strange. The performance form is similar to Broadway, giving people different aesthetic experiences. The theme is to love small animals. The impression of this job on the editor is not only sensational, but also not enough to make people laugh. At first, there were some good luggage and interesting indexes, but there was basically no laughter behind, only a sensational feeling.

In addition, the works still have a sense of twists and turns, and the human and material resources are relatively extravagant. It still follows the road of making up stories before adding luggage. But the story is usually well done, but the burden is not much in the end, so the funny effect is naturally poor. What people didn't expect was Li Ding and Dong Jianchun, who created a dark horse work in this episode. The whole "borrowing an umbrella in the lake" has stories, omens and luggage. The story in the early stage is very thorough, so the luggage in the back will tremble one by one, and the audience is very happy. Li Ding, in particular, plays jokes and shakes his luggage at a tight pace. When the rhythm is tense, a smile will naturally appear.

But during the performance, Li Ding also exposed a shortcoming, and his nervousness was clearly written on his face. In addition, the whole work shows that the burden of comedy is not particularly intensive and the funny index of the burden is not particularly large. Let the audience worry more, and the audience laughs too little. It can be said that as far as the burden of comedy is concerned, this work lags far behind Elevator Adventure. In addition, the three lecturers pay more attention to the firmness and integrity of the story when commenting. At this point, scum is a bit disadvantageous. However, I think Elevator Adventure is not so bad, and it is also a very hard work. Whether it is a book or a performance, there is no problem. ?