Relativistic problem

The reason why the relativistic effect is mentioned mainly refers to the previous cyclotron, which uses the characteristic that the period of the electron's circular motion in the magnetic field does not change with the speed, and uses an alternating electric field with the same period to accelerate. However, with the increase of speed, the increase of mass caused by relativistic effect changes the period of electron motion and deviates from the original period of equal electric field, so further acceleration is limited.

But for the electron induction accelerator, the alternating magnetic field is excited by exciting current, and the eddy electric field is excited by using the alternating magnetic field. The method is to extract electrons before the direction of the electric field changes. Moreover, because the electric field is very strong, the electrons also have a certain speed before the accelerator, so in fact, during the acceleration period before the direction of the electric field changes, the electrons have circled hundreds of thousands of times, and the speed can reach above 0.99999c C.

Therefore, it is not the relativistic effect that affects electron acceleration, but the loss caused by electron radiation electromagnetic wave.

It is by no means plagiarism.

There is something wrong with what LR4977 said. First of all, the requirement of alternating electric field for particle motion is that the period is constant, not the acceleration is constant, because the acceleration is meaningless and variable, and f=ma=Bvq, because the mass is constant, the magnetic induction intensity is constant, the charge amount is constant, and the speed increases with the acceleration of electric field. It should be pointed out that the cyclotron did not deviate from the orbit at all, because there was only a short electric field.

In addition, the electron induction accelerator does not accelerate linearly, and the electrons still do cyclotron motion. The difference is that the latter accelerates in the whole hovering process, while the former accelerates twice in a cycle, that is, for a short time every half turn. In addition, the alternating electric field of the latter is excited by the alternating magnetic field excited by the excitation current, so the intensity is greatly improved compared with the former, and it is not a linear problem at all. The induction accelerator naturally uses an induced electric field, usually a vortex electric field. How can I accelerate in a straight line?

To put it bluntly, the advantages of the latter are long acceleration distance and large electric field intensity. All right, no nonsense.