What role does dog meat play at the dinner table? Why is it controversial to fast dog meat?

I don't think eating dog meat is controversial, but the source of dog meat is controversial.

First, the source of dog meat is unknown, and dog thieves or stray dogs without immunity are not ruled out. The state supervision failed to fulfill its responsibility and failed to punish the illegal traders and criminals in the above-mentioned dog meat circulation chain.

Second, the status of dogs is getting higher and higher. Dogs are so special in the animal kingdom because dogs and people can communicate with each other more easily. Besides guarding their homes and doing their duty, they can also be good companions. However, dogs have different temperaments. Some are loyal to their duties, some are gentle and clever, and some are bullying (especially for children and women). So different people have different views on different dogs, the same people have different views on different dogs, and even different people have different views on the same dog.

However, although there are some laws and regulations about keeping dogs at present, such as public morality, immunization, feces disposal, tying dogs when going out, etc., there are also many dog slaves who do not abide by laws and regulations and conventions. Although it may not really be a life-threatening event, it will at least make the opposition between the two sides heavier.

Third, sympathy for animals that fail to take care of them can also cause contradictions. Take stray dogs as an example, caring people feed them and even build temporary dog sheds for them. From the perspective of love, there is nothing wrong with it. However, if you choose public places where the elderly, women and children often pass for your own convenience, the sanitary conditions are worrying and the immunization and epidemic prevention of stray dogs are poor. Third, if you meet a vicious dog or an ignorant urchin, you will be hurt by the dog, which is both trouble and sin. There are even individuals who gather stray dogs in the only way for neighbors to go home, which is naturally full of contradictions.

If you really love dogs, educate people around you not to abandon animals. If conditions are good, take it home or ask for help from animal rescue organizations. If the conditions are not good, feed it in a place that does not disturb the people. Why do you want to increase neighborhood conflicts and insist on putting irrelevant dog rights above reasonable human rights?

Fourth, both Guangxi and North Korea are just customs and habits. If the source of dog meat is legal, but extremists insist on using money to redeem their lives, it looks great on the surface, but it actually encourages the custom of eating dog meat. Next time, dog dealers will naturally step up their efforts and sell more dogs. This kindness really saved the dog's life.

As for those who don't give money to stop the car, in fact, in most cases, they can't get good results. After all, without legal support, anything that goes to extremes is bound to be bad. Extreme religion may bring terrorists, and extreme environmental protection may not necessarily harm others. Might as well talk about jurisprudence. If we can really change the customs, it is a good thing to take the main road by legislation.