Is the childhood of rural children happier or that of urban children happier?

Each has his own happiness. But I think children in rural areas are happier because they are easy to satisfy. . . .

Children in most cities are more knowledgeable than children in rural areas. Many rural children are exposed to toys, scenes and scenery that they have never seen before. So why are children in cities more precocious? It's because they have more contacts and have been in touch with society for a long time.

Children in rural areas have a more innocent childhood.

There are many cram schools and many interest classes. I usually play with chickens, ducklings and puppies, dig dirt, climb trees and swim in the river. Catch bugs, throw a sandbag, and chase with neighbors and friends in vegetable fields. How happy I am.

However, children in cities are highly competitive. Parents want to give their children a carefree childhood, but the children around them are working hard and learning all kinds of skills. Parents gradually feel that children can't keep up with the pace of other children if they don't work hard, and they also start to let their children have various tutoring.

Moreover, parents in rural areas are busy, and children can get along with nature and learn various life skills from it.

However, if parents in the city are busy, children may only get along with electronic products, TV dramas and computers. Gradually, their brains will become more rigid, their eyes will be nearsighted early, and their bodies will hunch over.

So to sum up, do you think children in rural areas are happier or children in cities are happier?

Finally, Sister Ma summed up a word of conscience that children with parents are happier.

Just sauce purple.