Joke Collection Website - Cold jokes - Tsinghua of Peking University signed an agreement with the students, but if he didn't return it after finishing his studies, he would have to return the occupied funds. Do you agree?

Tsinghua of Peking University signed an agreement with the students, but if he didn't return it after finishing his studies, he would have to return the occupied funds. Do you agree?

It should have been like this! At the same time, we ask our entrepreneurs and stars to set a good example for children and students. Don't move children overseas, because their influence is very great. Take practical actions, find ways, make mistakes, and don't talk about patriotism. Ten-year compulsory education, national preferential treatment enjoyed by universities, preferential treatment for going abroad, etc. Why can't I return it?

Because you gave them a ladder to comfort themselves? ! Just as some people don't recommend severely punishing traffickers because they are afraid that the means of traffickers will be worse after severe punishment, first of all, you just stand in a relatively low position and think about the problem! Treat injustice and never tolerate it. To solve the problem, we must start from the source. Education should start at an early age, not take exams every day. Turns out you can't even be a man! Therefore, those who have not come back must come back, and students who have hope for the future should be educated early!

The proposal is reasonable. Ask yourself, what does it feel like for parents to raise their children and be abandoned? The state spends a lot of manpower, financial resources and material resources to train a talent. In the end, drawing water with a sieve is unacceptable to the country and the people. Therefore, there must be a trust constraint and we must abide by each other. Unification is not necessarily an alma mater, as long as it is in one's own country. Parents should be responsible when signing the contract, lest the agreement become a piece of waste paper!

The best way is: the cost of studying abroad is paid by the students from the bank first, and then paid by the state after returning home. Those who don't return to China repay their loans by themselves, and those who refuse to repay their loans are included in the list of untrustworthy people, enjoying the same "treatment" as domestic untrustworthy laolai.

The state can only restrict those who study abroad at public expense, because you don't spend your own money. The rest is none of your business. Moreover, it is also a joke to use an agreement to limit whether you are patriotic or not. Unpatriotic, what's the use of buying it back with money? As the saying goes, catching a soldier doesn't kill a thief. Regardless of foreign countries and theories, he firmly supports signing a contract and needs a guarantor. The state should be kind to those who return home after their studies, and those who serve abroad are forbidden to return home to visit relatives!

Patriotism is important, but many students have poor family conditions. They know that only by studying hard can they improve their lives and knowledge can change their destiny. However, the treatment of returning to China can't make them improve their lives at all, and their wages can't even afford to buy a house. Therefore, solving the treatment problem is the real feasible solution.

It is the stupidest way for schools to sign agreements with students! That's no way; If the school wants students to serve the motherland after their studies, it must first strengthen moral education in this respect; The second is professional training. In China, after students enter the society, don't let them think that study and practice are two different things, and then study sociology!

A twisted melon is not sweet, and the country in your heart will defect sooner or later. You can learn from Macao's legislation on the punishment of theft, robbery and other crimes, because you have received a high amount of state funding, which means that what you have learned has been labeled as a country, and taking state-owned assets to help foreign countries is a betrayal of the country.

If this works, things will be simple. You think others care about those few dollars, and the key is to increase attractiveness. The improvement of treatment, working environment and technical level is the key point. You have to understand the real reason why they don't want to go back to China, and continuous improvement is the key. That kind of agreement can only make people understand their relationship with the motherland as an agreed relationship. That's a German vest.

If the state gives money, there are no conditions and it is unfair to the people. If you spend your own money and others talk about you, it's a bit too much. In addition, the purpose of studying abroad is to train future talents for the country. So make a promise in good faith.

You can take such measures as long as you want to break up with the world. Moreover, people's knowledge can't be bought with money alone, but also needs personal efforts. It is necessary to encourage him to return to China after finishing his studies, but it is understandable to stay abroad for the time being. He will come back when the motherland grows up. The country is also very confident.

First of all, I personally think that this method of retaining people by agreement is not a good method in any country and at any time. Even if there is a way to take economic punishment measures or administrative means to force people to stay, it is difficult to keep his heart.

Second, every teenager has the right to receive formal compulsory and non-compulsory education in China, which is the obligation of the state to them and has no right to punish them.

Third, for students studying abroad at public expense, they can sign a return service agreement with the school or the institution that provides the cost of studying abroad. Those who fail to perform the agreement may be ordered to repay the study abroad fees obtained from the corresponding institutions. Of course, you can also consider adding an appropriate fine. This is a well-founded measure and can be implemented.

But in the final analysis, whether talents return to China depends on whether the country has a good environment to attract and condense talents. If you want to think independently, scholars who don't want to be attached to power often block their own works, or criticize their own ideas, and they are not allowed to exist, express different ideas, and participate in calm discussions.

It is very necessary for students studying abroad after graduation from universities such as Beiqing to sign a responsibility letter for tuition refund. When the students come back, the country will naturally return them. If they don't have feelings for home and country and don't come back to serve their country, I'm sorry. For the students who are willing to serve their country, please return all their expenses to the country! In particular, students studying abroad at public expense should also recover their investment in studying abroad at public expense!

He doesn't want to return to China after graduation, which can be his freedom. But how much did the country invest in his research? For example, it is compulsory to graduate from the first grade of primary school to junior high school, that is, the state pays for training successors. Those who go abroad a few years after college, some of whom graduated with master's or doctor's degrees, have to sign a contract before going abroad. If they don't return to China, they will have to pay the national education funds for these years (starting from primary school) plus liquidated damages.

Taxpayers pay taxes and have the right to education. There's no need to thank this and that. Where to go after school is also a taxpayer's business. As long as the law allows, you can go wherever you want. Do you know who raises who? Do you know where their salary comes from? You have to sign an agreement. If the teaching is not good or satisfactory to the taxpayer, you will return the salary and funds to the taxpayer. You can sign this if you want.

First of all, schools should strengthen patriotism education. Science has no national boundaries, so do scientists. Secondly, it is best to sign an agreement on studying abroad at public expense. It is natural for the state to pay for training you to go abroad for further study. If you return to China to serve your country, it is equivalent to borrowing money and not paying it back. It is unreasonable to recover the training fees and interest paid by the state. There should also be some punishment measures, and they should be included in the credit system. Agreement can't solve everyone, but talk is better than nothing.

Those who can get into Tsinghua of Peking University are the top students in China. Unfortunately, most of the graduates have become door-to-door sons-in-law, and few are for the motherland. Therefore, it is necessary to improve an effective system to reduce or eliminate similar anomalies. Signing a contract is one way, but not necessarily the best policy. We should make a fuss about enrollment, move the barrier forward, and let those who are patriotic, enterprising and determined to serve the motherland enter the school for further study and become useful talents for rejuvenating China!

To do a good job in ideological and political work and patriotism education, there must be some hard and fast rules, so that our best resources can be used in the construction of the motherland and the cause of the people. This is reasonable. We always give the best resources to Americans. Don't you feel arrogant?

Reduce funds, from principals to teachers, and reduce the qualifications and quantity of priority selection. Whoever has made great contributions to the country will have priority. You can't send good students to the den of thieves, you will be ungrateful, betrayed, betrayed and become the enemy of your parents after graduation! You can only ask him to accept less than 500,400, or stop enrolling students for one year, cancel two schools and assign them to other schools according to their academic level.

The cultivation of traditional education and patriotism education is indispensable, but it should also be restricted. If you want to restrict it, you can't consider it personally, and his (her) parents should also bear certain social responsibilities. Only in this way can more talents return and contribute their scientific and technological strength to China and the nation. Historical experience tells us that preaching alone cannot have a strong effect. For example, during the Anti-Japanese War, most defected traitors received strict education from the Party, which finally brought a lot of pain to the interests of our country and nation. Finally, the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation is impossible without the efforts of more scientists!

The reason why the United States is far ahead in the field of science and technology is that it has absorbed all the elite students in the world to contribute to it. China's best talents gather in Tsinghua and Peking University, and a large number of elites go abroad for further study. Those who left after graduation served the United States and never came back. The top talents trained in China are continuously transported to the United States, which loses the significance of further study and serving the motherland. The gap between China and the United States in the field of science and technology is still far away, which requires the efforts of Chinese sons and daughters. The United States tried every means to choke us and completely defeated our country. Talents should contribute to the motherland, and the purpose of training is meaningful. Retaining talents is the focus of our party's work.

To tell the truth, the country really does not lack education funds. As for many international students from Tsinghua Peking University, mainly people have the right to choose. What the country should do is to attach importance to talents, provide a good working environment, and not always label them. In China, you are very careful about what you say, and the academic circle also talks about seniority. Proud young people will naturally ignore you, and people can have other choices!