What is static context? I really don't understand. . .

Context is divided into dynamic context and static context. There is a joke in the west that the theater was performing and suddenly caught fire. The clown came to the front desk. He came to inform the audience: "There is a fire. Please leave the theater as soon as possible! " The result is laughter from the audience; The clown once again said more seriously, "There is a fire, please leave the theater as soon as possible!" " "I got a stronger laugh. The key here is: the clown knows that the context has changed qualitatively; The qualitative change of context changed the clown's identity. He is no longer a clown actor, but a theater worker and a theater spokesman. The tragedy here comes from the difference between the expressive context and the receptive context. The audience did not notice the qualitative change of the context, nor did they realize the role change of the clown. Or the opposition between the dynamic expression context of the expresser and the static acceptance context of the receiver.

Strictly speaking, in the philosophical sense, everything is moving, and nothing is absolutely static. So, theoretically, there is no static context. Everything moves, and all contexts are dynamic contexts. What we are doing here is relative, and neither side of the communication feels it or pays much attention to it. It will not lead to significant changes in communication effects or qualitative changes in communication activities, even in static context, or in static context, only quantitative changes, not qualitative changes; On the contrary, it is a dynamic background. To put it simply, in a communication activity, the context remains basically the same, and both parties do not think that the changing context is static; In communicative activities, the context has undergone a qualitative change, which is the dynamic context. 1964 after the summer vacation, Professor Gao of Peking University learned that the opponent of academic debate, Professor Fang Guangtao, had passed away, so he decided to give up the controversial paper and continue writing, because the study of context had undergone a qualitative change.

The writer writes a short article of several hundred words behind closed doors under a certain hypothetical context, which is static because the context has not changed qualitatively during the writing process. On the way in the morning, acquaintances meet and say hello, which is a static context, and there is no qualitative change during the period. Several children were talking, and suddenly an adult, even their teacher, came, and the context changed; A couple had a heart-to-heart talk in the park, and a juryman sat on a stool next to them, staring at them, and the context changed qualitatively; For teachers, when the bell rings, the context changes qualitatively. It's no use for students to lecture again.

In Lu Xun's novel The True Story of Ah Q, Grandpa Zhao and the scholar called him "Brother Ah Q", which is the product of the qualitative change of context (before and after the revolution). Wei Julian in Lu Xun's novel The Lonely Man first called the landlord's old lady an "old lady" and later called her an "old guy". The old lady of the landlord is disgusted with Wei's honorific title "old lady", but she loves to hear "old guy" and is very excited and spreads it everywhere. Wei's appellation changed because his social status changed or he was demoted. For the old lady, the landlord of the recipient, the expression context of her communication object has undergone a qualitative change. He was promoted to "Lord Wei" and became the object of her flattery. In movies and plays, there are often such details. Several people are talking about their boss, boss, teacher or other people who can't speak, such as Master Huang Feihong. They are very proud. Suddenly, the person being talked about came quietly, and Master Huang Feihong was behind him. Others found out, he didn't find out, and he talked nonsense. This is the clever use of dynamic context. At the diplomatic negotiating table, the qualitative change of the words of both sides often stems from the changes in the battlefield situation at the negotiating table. At the negotiating table of the Korean War, both sides paid close attention to the changes on the battlefield.

Dynamic context can be studied from two aspects: expressive context and receptive context. In Cao Yu's Sunrise, when Wang Fusheng answers the phone, he pretends to be Lao Zi, which is extremely rude. His exit is to call names and scold each other. Suddenly humble to act as a slave turtle grandson, cursing the ancestors for eight generations. This is because he found out the identity of the other party. That's Kimba's phone number. This is Wang Fusheng's grasp of dynamic context. At first, he thought that the caller was an ordinary person, even a person with low status. Suddenly, he recognized Ba Jin, and the expression context changed qualitatively, so his words made a 180 degree turn, and the qualitative change was completely different.

There are often scenes where a young man visits an authority he respects, and in the middle of his speech, he suddenly finds out that the other person is actually a pretentious professor. His reception context has undergone a qualitative change, and his reception effect is completely different. Due to the qualitative change of the recipient's context, the same discourse or text can often be interpreted in two completely different ways.

If we distinguish between oral communication and written communication, and between the speaker and the receiver, then the dynamic context of the receiver of written language is particularly noteworthy. For the same text, the recipient's reception context has undergone a qualitative change, and its reception effect is completely different. This acceptance effect is obviously the manifestation of this uncontrollable and irresponsible.

I'm also confused. Learn from each other!