The first time I met my in-laws, I recited Lu, making it clear that I am not a thrifty housekeeper. Is it wrong to do so?

That's right. If you have money, it is no problem to carry LV, and you can also carry several real estate licenses if you have money. However, if you want to show that you are not a thrifty housekeeper by carrying LV bags, it seems that you may not be able to achieve your goal. I always feel that the effect is that you might as well buy a lot of things to meet your in-laws, or take them out to eat when you meet for the first time, and order a big table of dishes lavishly ...?

There is no sin in carrying LV bags. Spend as much as you earn. In fact, it is no problem to carry LV bags. Many people around me like to buy luxury brand bags. Sometimes when I go out to play, I don't know what kind of car I am driving, but when I sit down, the brand-name bag of the same color still looks like a "local tyrant". As long as you don't steal or rob your own money, you can spend your own money at will.

It is wrong to buy luxury goods beyond one's consumption capacity and spend heavily in debt. However, among the friends who buy luxury bags, some people are really good, earning tens of thousands of dollars a month, and buying a bag casually is nothing. Although some people earn only a few thousand dollars, they still want to buy tens of thousands of bags, and even can't stand waiting for a long time, so they use credit methods such as consumer loans to buy luxury bags. However, in the end, due to personal economic strength, it was impossible to repay in time, resulting in a stain on the credit record. ...

So how did you get your LV? Did you buy it yourself? Within the scope of personal consumption ability, it has exceeded consumption and had a great impact on life. This is the difference between right and wrong. After all, people who buy LV bags will never only have this luxury, and their daily consumption is not low. ...

It is better to truly show your consumption concept and level than to be discovered after hiding. However, I think I should give you a compliment. Seeing my in-laws for the first time can really show my consumption concepts and habits. Because of your frankness, you can also let your in-laws see what the economic level and consumption level of both sides are like. In order to avoid not knowing the truth and feeling that the two sides are not suitable in the future, there are always contradictions in daily life because of consumption problems. I think this girl is actually quite nice.

If there is a problem, it will be exposed at the first meeting. If it's really inappropriate, there's no need to talk about it. Both sides save time, effort and worry. I really want to live together, only to find that my daughter-in-law always buys them in buy buy. If I can't stand it, I always blame and dissuade her, but my daughter-in-law can't change this consumption habit. There must be contradictions between the two sides. ...

So, girl, this is not only not wrong, but quite right. ?

It is important to be suitable for each other, and it is also important to have the same consumption concept. In fact, if both parties have the same consumption concept or consumption level, buying a LV bag is nothing at all. A colleague got married and gave 50 wedding banquets, and the dowry was also very luxurious. The other party was also the gateway. He doesn't feel that his colleagues spend money indiscriminately, but he has repeatedly raised the consumption standard of wedding banquets. ...

Whether you have money, whether you are willing to spend money, and how you usually spend money are actually difficult to change. Therefore, if the consumption concept is the same, one will not be too shabby and stingy, and the other will be too extravagant and wasteful ... and there will not be so many contradictions.