"Don't burn people as garbage." Professor Peking University called for the restoration of burial, emphasizing "the safety of being buried underground". what do you think?

In his view, burial has been a tradition in China for thousands of years. About what? Rest in peace? This is the emotional sustenance of relatives for the deceased. This is a yearning for reflection. Can you have a spiritual sustenance? Look at the disadvantages of cremation, that is, the price is too high and the groups with poor economic foundation will eventually be unsustainable because of cremation. Rest in peace? Isn't that a joke? Traditional funeral customs gradually disappear with the replacement of simplified cremation process.

1, the data of the current situation in earlier years show that the price of cemeteries in first-tier cities such as Beishangguang is as high as 200,000 yuan per square meter, which is really worse than the external sales price of Tomson Yipin!

Besides, now

Recently, Wu Fei, a professor of philosophy at Peking University? Call for the restoration of burial? The suggestion once again triggered a hot discussion on the whole network!

The pollution of cremation to the environment is immeasurable, which does not conform to the current environmental protection concept. At the same time, cremation will also lead to the increasing use of cemetery area and waste of land resources. Moreover, the tombstone and its own structure of the cemetery are marble, which is difficult to degrade for thousands of years and will not disappear and gradually weather like mud.

Professor Wu Fei also thinks that cremation is disrespectful to the dead, because cremation is similar to? Treat people like garbage? A person's life should have a perfect ending, so that the disposal of corpses becomes similar to? Garbage incineration? This makes the meaning of the funeral completely disappear.

2. Basic arguments of the proposal According to relevant information, Professor Wu Fei of Peking University called for the resumption of burial six years ago, and he has always opposed it. Cremation instead of burial is to save land and crack down on feudal superstition, but from the present tense, it seems to have little effect, but it has brought many other influences, and social contradictions have become sharp and difficult to deal with!

Although the professor put forward the opposite suggestion, we need to look at it from a dialectical point of view! At the scene of Professor Wu Fei's speech, a journalism student put forward different views:

In his opinion, it is desirable to put forward the opposite view, but it does not mean that the proposer will let us do as he says. The most important thing is to think through the key points and try to answer the questions of the proposer. Or maybe this view, if it is wrong, then let's take an example and prove it through data!

Perhaps this is the academic charm!

It is likely that some people will ask, why did Professor Wu Fei's remarks six years ago rekindle the hot discussion among netizens today?

The root cause is because of this phenomenon, we have to face it squarely! It has reached a step that must be solved, because this contradiction is becoming more and more obvious.

3. Public Attitude Netizens have had a heated discussion about this:

Some people think that the cultivated land area in China is decreasing now, and cremation is still needed to ensure the cultivated land area and grain output in the city.

There are also some netizens who believe that the price of cemeteries in their cities is indeed too high, which has far exceeded the residential buildings. And the use of the cemetery, will also occupy the area, and it is difficult to downgrade! The cemetery that is finally buried will still become land and mountains. This is more suitable for long-term development!

Secondly, that is to say, if we look at this question from the perspective of environment and culture, we will get different answers.

For example, making coffins requires a lot of wood trunks, which is a great waste of renewable environmental protection resources; Secondly, cremation also does serious harm to environmental pollution?

It's really hard to have it both ways!

In fact, it is best to discuss the specific funeral methods according to regional differences, regional population and land area. Perhaps this way can weigh the pros and cons and find the most suitable solution.

What do you think of this argument?