Tesla Auto Show rights protection owner apologizes, is he the original fault?

Buying a Tesla car costs hundreds of thousands of yuan. If it weren’t for the quality of the car itself, who would be idle to seek justice? For this car owner, the reason why he went to Shanghai The main reason for defending the rights at the auto show was that a serious traffic accident almost occurred during the Spring Festival, and this serious accident almost killed four members of their family. Regarding such a matter, the female car owner also said that she would not give up her rights protection, and also clearly pointed out that Tesla officials did not provide driving data. Without this data, it would be difficult to verify whether there is a quality problem with the car itself. , if there is no problem with the car, why not give this driving data? There must be a torture question here.

The administrative detention of this rights-defending female car owner is legal and compliant, because the car owner defended her rights in the form of disrupting public order. After all, the auto show is a public place, and people The traffic must be very large. For this car owner to wear a piece of clothing and run to the roof of the car with a loudspeaker. This will indeed cause chaos to the order of the scene. The police punishment is also based on the law. Later, the car owner who defended his rights was carried out by the security personnel. This reminds me of the previous incident of the female Mercedes-Benz car owner defending her rights. She shed tears. This time, she directly arrested you. It was really a joke. If you dare to defend your rights, I won't dare to detain you.

After this incident, Tesla also issued an announcement. The announcement really chilled us and made us have a lot of questions about this product, because Tesla’s response was very special. It's so tough that people can't feel any warmth, and it feels like they are on the verge of breaking out. Tesla’s memory is: not compromising on unreasonable demands, which is also our attitude. Reasonableness needs to be examined, but when it comes to protecting a consumer's rights, if a business does not adopt a fair, just, open and transparent attitude, it will obviously make people question it, and it will be difficult for people to believe that this is an unreasonable request from the car owner.

In fact, these things also led to the car owner being administratively detained. She also issued an apology, but she did not give up continuing to defend her rights after the apology. In fact, many consumers need to step forward to defend their rights and pay a small price, so we should all stick to our own rights and positions. The car owner apologized only because he took the wrong approach to safeguard his rights, which had a bad impact on the auto show. Likewise, the subject of his apology was the security department of the convention and exhibition center and the corresponding personnel present, but it was not Regarding Tesla, she finally added that she would use reasonable means to defend her rights. We will wait and see who is right and wrong.