How to evaluate dan brown's Hell?

I just finished reading it, and I will briefly talk about my own views. It is estimated that it has no reference value and is a bit spoiler. Just write casually.

On the whole, a very good novel! In line with Dan Brown's consistent novel style (nonsense).

Wonderful story! The plot is compact! Rich imagination!

Another point is the reflection on philosophy, humanities or science reflected (or put forward) in the full text.

The following details:

1. The story itself is wonderful, from the suspense setting of the dan brown Conference to the multi-line narrative and then to the plot reversal.

For example, Langdon's amnesia, such as pig's feet, killers, policemen and Dean's multi-line descriptions, such as the reversal of who is good and who is evil behind them.

It has to be mentioned that this book involves a lot of information and materials about European historical and cultural sites, which has caused great obstacles to reading. People who don't know and are not interested in these histories will find it difficult to read and have an interest in reading, which is a bit like Digital Castle, which was almost impossible to read at the beginning.

There is a post recommended for reading and reference in the post bar, which is very effective for helping reading.

3. The characterization in dan brown's novels is a double-sided description of good and evil. Basically, except robert langdon (male pig's feet), even female pig's feet can't be clearly judged sometimes. The image of each character is full, and the back of each character is full of stories. Even a simple description can't help but remind people (such as Marta in the museum).

4. The theme of "Hell" is around the global population problem (anthropology), combining genetic science and moral definition (philosophy) on population issues, which is in line with dan brown's consistent style. Angels and demons combine China's physics and religion.

What's more, all the questions raised by dan brown in his novels have profound practical significance.

1. The global population problem in hell is very thought-provoking. According to the current trend of population growth, mankind is bound to perish. This is not an environmental problem or a problem of the World Health Organization, but a simple and desperate mathematical problem, which is inevitable!

With the development of human science and technology, genetic engineering has made more and more progress. Is it the destruction of evolution or the way of evolution to implant genetic engineering into human beings? Is it a good thing or a bad thing for rights organizations in the world to acquire such technology?

All in all, while the novel is wonderful, the thoughts put forward in the book are thought-provoking!