Which side do you support in the dispute between Gree and Oaks?

You can choose to watch, because it is not clear until the dust settles. At present, both sides are talking about their own affairs and have no intention of stopping. Besides, some things can't be seen clearly by outsiders without waiting for the investigation and handling of authoritative departments.

These two days, this thing has been very hot. Gree reported Oaks, and Oaks also reported the problems reported by Gree. The two are on good terms, and the market supervision and management department has also stepped in. With the development of the situation and the passage of time, the truth will come out, but at this juncture of the summer air-conditioning war, the debate between the two is somewhat unexpected.

Gree has always been the representative of high-end air conditioners, and Oaks has always been the endorsement of cost performance. They are a bit like Apple and Xiaomi in the mobile phone industry. It's not the same grasshopper on the same line. This time, they want to tear their faces instead of being indecent. This battle is a bit interesting.

There are different reasons and opinions. Consumers come from different teams. I'm cheap and plentiful. Why buy Gree? I'm a brand spokesperson. I like it when it's expensive. In the past two days, consumers in reports and comments have also said their own words, but no matter how loud the voice is, we have to wait for the conclusion. Whether Oaks really has product defects or whether Gree has framed it, we have to wait, but I think Gree must have evidence, otherwise it will not be easy to shoot.

Personal opinion, for reference only, please leave a message to pay attention.