How to submit sci? Not every author can receive email.

1.。 SCI papers are not as difficult to write as expected.

1. Be familiar with your major and experimental methods; We should respect the results, face the results realistically, and read more literature before writing, especially recent foreign literature. I believe that as long as the results are correct, they can be explained and published.

2. For beginners, "copying" is inevitable, and the beauty lies in the skill of "copying". The writing format of research articles of the same nature is similar, so the format can be copied. Common sentence patterns can be copied flexibly. Some descriptive and conclusive sentences should be expressed and summarized in your own language when reading. But don't copy the original sentences you don't understand, otherwise the small ones will be jokes, and the big ones will ruin the future of the article.

3. Try to use words you are familiar with. Don't deliberately use flowery, rarely used or uncommon words.

4. Willing to invest energy and time.

5. After the article is written, you must ask the tutor, the boss, * * * and the author or colleagues to review it together. If necessary, you can also ask a professional service company with high credibility (such as Medtronic) to improve the success rate.

2. How to contribute?

In fact, which magazine the paper is sent to is still learned. Generally, it depends on the novelty and creativity of the subject, the integrity and reliability of the experimental results, and the quality of the paper writing. If you have enough time (1 year or more), you'd better invest in a magazine that is higher than your target magazine, even Lancet, NEJM, JAMA and so on. These magazines either directly reject the manuscript or return it for review (and a few directly accept the manuscript). The former usually takes less than a week to complete, while the latter takes 1-2 months. So even if you reject the manuscript, you won't lose anything, but you may receive very constructive opinions or suggestions. You know, people who comment on these magazines are not idle people. When they hit the nail on the head to put forward the "weakness" of the article, they often put forward many good suggestions to improve the paper. If you don't have time to wait, you want to win the paper at once, but you don't want to "marry" your masterpiece, so you have to bother to choose.

Three. How to select reviewers

Many magazine editors want you to recommend 3-4 reviewers, and they are likely to send invitations to the reviewers you recommend. Therefore, the recommended reviewers are still knowledgeable. If the reviewers you recommend are too busy or "awesome", they will simply ignore the invitation of ordinary magazines, and your article may not be able to find reviewers in time. In fact, the magazine does not require too much for the identity of the reviewer, but the reviewer must be an expert in a certain profession. Therefore, many authors who have published papers in a certain major will receive invitations for peer review. Therefore, you don't have to be too picky when recommending reviewers. Suggestion: 1. Recommend authors who have published articles with similar results and conclusions abroad; 2. Recommend the author who cited the paper in your paper; 3. Recommend professors and associate professors of the same major that you or your boss know.

Four. On the withdrawal of the draft

Some authors need to withdraw their manuscripts for various reasons, but they are worried that the editors will be unhappy and even blacklisted. In fact, this kind of worry is unnecessary. But what needs to be explained is, why did you withdraw the manuscript? Is the material method unreliable and the result cannot be repeated, or is there something wrong with the design itself? These are all reasons for withdrawing the manuscript. However, at present, due to institutional reasons in China, many authors contribute more than one manuscript. When this article was accepted by one magazine, the author began to ask other magazines to withdraw it. This kind of behavior of multiple contributions is despised by foreign scholars. Because it will waste a lot of time for editors and reviewers.

How to deal with editor's letter with verb (abbreviation of verb)

1. The rejection rate of foreign publications is high or low. The rejection rate of magazines with a score of 5 or more can be as high as 80%, and that of general magazines is above 30%. Therefore, if you receive such a reply, you should revise the manuscript according to the review comments, and then submit it to other magazines according to the revised quality. Usually invest in magazines with low impact factors. However, if the reviewers put forward very constructive opinions and suggestions, and you feel that you have fully and reasonably answered these opinions and suggestions, you can definitely invest in better magazines.

2. Re-submission after revision happens from time to time. It often shows that the paper is not competitive enough or even flawed. It is usually necessary to make up measurements or data. Many reviewers' opinions are also inconsistent, and the editors can't decide. So it will be revised for the author. At this time, the author should carefully read the opinions and suggestions of the editor and each reviewer, supplement at least one experiment suggested by the reviewer (it is better to supplement all of them), and then answer every question of the reviewer reasonably. Papers submitted after revision are regarded as new contributions, which will be renumbered, re-evaluated by the original reviewers, and even sent to another group of reviewers for review. But as long as the opinions and suggestions of editors and reviewers are seriously responded, most papers will be accepted.

3. The difference between revision (major revision or minor revision) and re-submission after revision is that the revised article will not be renumbered, but only R 1 will be added after the original number. In fact, the "overhaul" of many magazines is no less than the above-mentioned "modification before investment". Not easy to despise. Similarly, the revised article may be sent to the original reviewer for review. Generally, the chances of being admitted are very high. The article of "minor repairs and minor supplements" has generally been accepted in principle, but there are a few places that need to be confirmed and revised by the author, so it is similar to the "conditional acceptance" of some magazines (see below).

Except for a few magazines, most magazines, especially high-quality magazines, will not "accept" the papers submitted for the first time as they are. The best case is "accepted with or without minor changes", that is, the paper will be accepted as long as the author agrees to make some changes or supplements. However, most papers were received after the first revision. Sometimes a second revision is needed. Generally, two revisions can't satisfy reviewers, and editors often reject manuscripts.

How do intransitive verbs answer reviewers?

Keep a clear head and stay calm. Don't use the "prejudice" mentality to judge whether the reviewer is "biased" or "discriminatory". Doing research is really hard, and publishing articles is really not easy. But the reviewers are also very hard and not easy. They read your articles carefully and give you pertinent opinions, even good suggestions. If you scold me in strong words for a while, no one will be angry. You know, it is not difficult to find a reason to reject an article. Therefore, at this time, you must calm down, analyze and understand the opinions of the reviewers, and find out the problems.

Seven. Matters after the paper is accepted

After the paper is accepted, you will receive the proof sent back by the printing editor. Proofreading is not allowed to change greatly unless there is a principled error. Proofreading mainly checks whether the fund number is wrong, whether the author's name is wrong, and whether the data in the chart is wrong. Some magazines are not allowed to revise after proofreading. Further changes will be charged and the release will be delayed. Proofreading usually needs to be sent back to the print editor as soon as possible. When sending proofs, the publishing society requires to fill in the Copyright Transfer Book and tell them how to pay the publishing fee and how to order brochures. In the past, most magazines didn't charge page fees. Now, with the popularity of open access, more magazines charge page fees, but at least half of them still don't. However, at present, few people ask the author for papers, and it is easy for the author to obtain the pdf text of his papers from the Internet and send it to the requester by e-mail.

Eight. Matters after the publication of the paper

Once a paper is published, it should not be retracted. In the eyes of many people, "retraction" is almost equivalent to "academic misconduct". Therefore, more than one manuscript or more than one manuscript also involves the issue of integrity, which should be carefully considered before publishing the paper. In addition, after the paper is published, you may receive a paper request letter from scholars in underdeveloped countries or at home. This shows that someone is interested in your paper. Secondly, someone may read and quote your paper, thus increasing your popularity. Many universities evaluate the level of papers according to their impact factors and citation times. In this regard, you should take a positive attitude and try to send them the pdf text you downloaded online by email.

Be a paper net, and provide papers for publication, titles, educational papers, academic papers, architectural papers and medical papers. Thesis field: education, architecture, economy, management, social science, medicine, literature, agriculture, sports, accounting, science and technology, machinery, computer, law, art, journalism, engineering, transportation, science and engineering, nursing and other majors.