Is it true that ancient war generals were all fighting alone?

Is it true that ancient war generals were all fighting alone?

During the Wanli period of the Ming Dynasty, Japan invaded Korea and met Liaodong Tieqi in the Ming Dynasty. At that time, a general in the Japanese army read Romance of the Three Kingdoms crazily and admired the military commanders of the Three Kingdoms. He jumped out and shouted, "Who will fight me?" The Ming army thought he was crazy and beat him into a sieve with a musket. "Ride" is also called one-on-one combat, which means to fight alone.

It seems that the Romance of the Three Kingdoms has done a lot of harm. Looking at ancient romance novels, what impressed me the most was "military commanders hitting on each other". When the two armies fought, the soldiers lined up.

The generals of both sides rode on white horses or red horses, armed with spears or broadswords and wearing silver helmets or golden armour, and marched to the most dangerous front line, shouting loudly, "Who dares to go out and fight me to the death?" At this time, in the other camp, there is no need to shoot at random, and there is no need to beat him up, but it is all the same. A team member flashed out and ran to the most dangerous front line, shouting "Who are you?" Give me your name as soon as possible, I won't die under the gun! "Then, it is two people's one-on-one hit.

The result of one-on-one hit: a general was dismounted without a single game, or three or five games, or dozens of games. Without any counterattack, the soldiers surrendered immediately and the war was over. Give people the impression that as long as the Lord wins, the whole army will win; As long as the commander loses, the whole army loses.

The outcome of the whole war depends entirely on the martial arts of the two commanders. Soldiers only play a decorative role and have no practical value. If so, why do you need so many soldiers? Do the soldiers just stand by and watch the fun? Won't the soldiers rush in and catch the lone enemy?

Therefore, some people say that on the real battlefield, the one-on-one combat of military commanders simply does not exist, because it simply does not conform to the basic laws of war. It is entirely the novelist's wishful thinking that there will be a one-on-one fight between military commanders in romantic novels, and its purpose is only to write beautifully and attract readers.

Not really. Some battles in history were fought by military commanders, but they were not as dramatic as those in novels, and they appeared much less frequently. What's more, one-on-one battles recorded in official history are often not real "wars", but at most "duels".

Moreover, it was polite to fight in the Spring and Autumn Period. First, an attacker sent an envoy to explain why he hit you. Then the one who was beaten also asked why he hit me. If the other side asks, the war will not start. A typical example is that the State of Qi went to fight the State of Chu, and if the envoy of Chu answered well, the war would not be fought.

Decided to fight, the two sides agreed on a good time, picked a good place, everyone finished breakfast, and then began to fight. The time of war is usually one morning, and if it is a big war, it will not last more than one day. Young people with white hair can't be killed. When the enemy retreats, they can only chase a certain distance, that is, 50 steps. After 50 steps, they can't catch up.

A war broke out in Chu Jin, and the Jin army was defeated. A car broke down and couldn't walk. Chu soldiers told Jin soldiers how to get there, and sure enough, according to Chu soldiers, the car ran away. As he ran, he said, "We are not as experienced as you." .

In fact, before the Song Dynasty, it was very common for military commanders to fight one-on-one. Many soldiers before and after the Tang Dynasty were able to catch young people, and armed herders were also able to shoot on horseback. Armed peasants recruited temporarily can't do anything well except clean the battlefield, so it's good to let this group of people stand in the same place on the battlefield. So many times, the most efficient way is to duel between the two sides. Once the other generals are killed, the outcome is settled.

One-on-one fighting, that is, fighting between military commanders, did exist in ancient times. For example, during the Three Kingdoms period, Lu Bu singled out Guo Si and Sun Ce singled out Taishi Ci, all of which are well documented. Other dynasties, such as the famous iron gun general Wang in the Five Dynasties, were addicted to one-on-one fighting.

Another general was captured and the whole army was defeated. For example, in the Battle of Hulaoguan in the Tang Dynasty, Dou Jiande was injured and captured when he came out of the battle, and the150,000 army suddenly collapsed. He has been operating in Hebei for many years, and is considered to be in harmony with Wang Zhengduo. As a result, it was destroyed in World War I.