It is urgent to demonstrate that "fools are not stupid"! ! ! ! ! ! !

Zhang Guosheng 1. Arousing Interest (The lesson "A Mountain of Yugong" is almost over) Have we finished the lesson "A Mountain of Yugong"? I have finished learning ... but I haven't finished learning ... The teacher seems to have finished learning-I read the text, summarized the main points and did my homework. I also explored the similarities and differences in attitudes between Gong Yu's wife and Zhizuo. However, this passage left us with an eternal question! What problem? It is wise to be a fool, but not a fool ... you are so smart! That year, I drove through Jiyuan County, Henan Province, that is, at the foot of Wuwang Mountain, and saw several big characters on a mountain: Gong Yu moved away from the mountain. -The story of "Yu Gong Yi Shan" touched and inspired countless people. His hometown people were proud of him, but someone in the car said, Are you stupid? -Are you stupid? Stupid ... not stupid! ..... silly! ..... Not stupid! Let me count-and he foolishly raised his hand ... about a third. Said he wasn't stupid enough to raise his hand ... about a third. The two factions are evenly matched! One third don't know yet. I think it is foolish not to raise your hand. Isn't it? Life is ... no! Why don't you raise your hand? They are thinking … afraid of making mistakes … afraid of being laughed at … oh, thinking, that makes sense. In this way, those who don't raise their hands may be the smartest-they make a splash without thinking ... Let's judge this: if they don't raise their hands now and in the debate tomorrow, we think he is stupid-OK? Shenghang Here, I reiterate that there are many talents, but the first one should be eloquence. The teacher's eloquence was highlighted in the debate. Have you ever heard of Mrs Thatcher? Have you ever heard of it? Who is the teacher? British president ... Britain has no president, only the prime minister. Shi is the British Prime Minister and the only female Prime Minister in British history. She has been re-elected for three times and is one of the most dazzling stars in world politics. If the word "female" is added before the word "star", there is no "one". It should also be noted that Britain is a very traditional and conservative country and a patriarchal society, especially in politics, which is a man's territory. Do you know why Margaret Thatcher, who was not a nobleman, defeated many male competitors in the male-dominated territory and became prime minister? Good eloquence. I'm sure! The so-called election campaign is actually a heated debate! What should I do without eloquence? Do you know how her eloquence is practiced? I don't know ... I've been practicing since I was a kid. Yes, I have practiced since I was a child. When Mrs Thatcher was only five years old, her father Roberts taught her to judge right and wrong with her own brain, to have her own opinions and to argue with her daughter on various issues. Under the careful training of her father, she was eloquent from an early age, and became the number one debater in the school debate club at the age of1/kloc-0. Her quick thinking, unique views, accurate words and great momentum not only made her classmates admit defeat, but also shocked adults. Born wow! This is what she said in her autobiography. For the debate, she has read widely since she was a child. She reads books that ordinary girls don't read. At the age of seven, her father took her to the library and only allowed her to read three books: biography, history and politics. He also bought a Philips radio for his daughter, so that she could get knowledge and information. Later, she was admitted to Oxford University. During her college years, she took part in the most activities, namely, debates. She often listens to "many speaking stars debating various issues, from world events to incredible trivial matters" and also appears in person. Because of his excellent eloquence, he was elected as the chairman of the Conservative Party Association of Oxford University-I estimate this position is equivalent to the party secretary of Peking University Tsinghua. Born wow! Later, with excellent eloquence, the teacher's career was smooth sailing: lawyer-member of parliament-cabinet minister-prime minister. Someone commented, "Margaret-her full name is Margaret Thatcher-Margaret first lived in a family without a bathroom, but she became the owner of Downing Street 10 with her eloquence"-do you know where Downing Street 10 is? I don't know ... This is the official residence of the British Prime Minister. Yes, you have a wide range of knowledge ... now let's go back to the question of whether that stupid old man is stupid or not-is he stupid or not? Stupid ... not stupid! ..... silly! ..... Not stupid! (One voice is louder than the other) The teacher is not stupid, not loud, but reasonable. It's unreasonable to just shout or say it's unreasonable. It makes sense to have me! Teacher, can you give more than three reasons? ..... Who can tell more than three truths now? Students (several raised their hands) can name five, can't they? ..... Oh, there is one. In fact, five words is not much, so it is better to say 10-that's what I did. Which school is the teacher from? I am a "double-faced" teacher, because I have prepared two truths, each of which is at least 10. Do any of you want to prepare two reasons? -Doing so is the biggest gain. Students (a few raise their hands) are good teachers. If you aim high, you will gain a lot. ..... The question is how to prepare these reasons. Tell me, where are you going to find reasons? Students discuss with their classmates ... consult their parents ... or consult ... online search. Yes, it's best to search online. What keywords do you use? Let a stupid person become a fool ... A stupid person can move mountains ... A stupid person can do it ... I'll give you two more suggestions: ① Not only prepare arguments, but also prepare refutations-refuting each other's views and reasons. (2) To this end, we might as well do some "intelligence" work and see what arguments the other side has prepared ... Well, see you in the debate tomorrow. Class is over. 2. Debate about the lesson of "Yu Gong Yi Shan". I have attended this lesson many times, so I won't go into the details of the debate. The summary is as follows: 1. Students' arguments always exceed the teacher's estimate. A teacher who attended the class said: the students in your class are really amazing! In fact, it is not that students are fierce, but that such activities are easy to mobilize their enthusiasm and let them play their creative ability. I have sorted out the summary of the debate and posted it on the internet. If you are interested, you can search for "independent exploration and creation-I teach Yugong Art Mountain", so I won't go into details here. 2. Teachers should play a "leading" role in the debate: on the one hand, as a moderator, inspire and guide in-depth thinking, on the other hand, be a "debater" in time to guide the direction. For example, in the actual debate, there are relatively many people who advocate "stupidity" and the reasons are relatively sufficient-although this is also worthy of recognition, it is biased after all-if students all think that "fools are too stupid" and everyone strives to be "wise", it will never be the success of our teaching. At this time, the reason I prepared in advance to be "not stupid" came in handy: 1 Gong Yu not only has lofty ambitions, but also has measures to implement them. He also knows geography-he knows that Taihang Mountain is "700 miles away", and the south of the king of Wu is south of Henan and Hanyin. He knows that he can throw rocks at the end of the Bohai Sea and the north of Tibetan soil-the ancient traffic is underdeveloped and human. He frightened the mountain gods, moved the Emperor of Heaven, and had great determination and perseverance to "make the gods cry". How can such a person be stupid? The author also thinks that fools are not stupid. He named them like this, which made Zhisou lose in the debate, meaning "fools are not stupid, but wise men are not wise". Great minds are often fools, and fools are often Xiao Zhi. Zhang Zhan of the Jin Dynasty commented on "One Mountain in Gong Yu" and said: "It is not necessarily unwise to call fools by vulgarity; Being a wise man is not necessarily stupid. "Henan people are proud of Yu Gong, and some people say that Yu Gong is stupid. Hubei people are not stupid-there are nine birds in the sky and Hubei people on the ground. There is a large sculpture in Wuhan East Lake Park-Gong Yu Yishan (photo). When Mr. Zhang visited here, he was deeply impressed by the wisdom of the decision makers who built this large sculpture. As a famous mathematician, Hua can't be stupid. He has a poem praising the foolish old man: clever calculation comes from clumsiness, and foolish old man and clever old man are separated. It takes a long time for a fool's wisdom to show, and it takes a long time to know his wisdom. Practice first, practice makes perfect. Diligence is a good training, and one point of hard work is one point of talent. This shows that fools are not stupid. Mao Zedong must be a very wise man. He once wrote the article "A Mountain of Yugong", calling on the whole party and the people of the whole country to "move mountains"-move the two mountains of imperialism and feudalism. He also said: "We will also touch God. This god is none other than the people of the whole country. The people of the whole country got up and dug these two mountains with us. What's wrong with digging them? Countless "mountains" in history have been moved by "fools": imperialism, feudalism, bureaucratic capitalism and dynasty change ... 9 If you think you are "stupid", you can think you are "smart": you must not only move mountains, but also change your home, road and "poor and white" face. Do not realize the great ideal of national prosperity and national rejuvenation. Always be poor, always suffer indignities, always be bullied, and always be a "sick man of East Asia" and an "inferior nation" ... (Reduction to absurdity) 3. After the debate, students' enthusiasm is mobilized, they often can't enjoy themselves because of time constraints, and there are still unfinished regrets after class. So I told my classmates: Teacher Zhang has posted on the "People's Education Forum" and "Middle School Chinese Education Forum" to discuss this issue. Please attend ... in this way, the debate will be moved from the classroom to the internet to continue. This has also expanded the realm of this course and formed a "network classroom" connecting schools, teachers and students all over the country. 3. After the composition debate, I asked the students to write a composition, or expound their own views, or summarize the views of both sides. Doing so, because there is a basis for debate, often can produce good articles. Practice has proved that this is indeed the case. Some students have novel and creative methods. For example, Yan Shuo said in his article that he was a bird: Before Gong Yu moved mountains, our family lived happily on Taihang Mountain, where the vegetation was dense and the birds were singing and the flowers were fragrant. Every day, we happily shuttle between flowers and trees. That day, when we were playing in the forest, we suddenly heard a flock of birds singing at the foot of the mountain: no! At the foot of the mountain, an old man moved the mountain and cut down all the trees ... so we flew away from Taihang Mountain in panic-Gong Yu made us lose our home, and we hated him! Chen Siwei made an IQ test report: Name: Gong Yu. Gender: male. Age: 90. Iq: 180. Foundation: ..... Huo wrote a TV script and acted as the host himself: Hello, everyone, welcome to the program Time Travel. Today, I will take you to a small mountain village in Taihang Mountain more than 3,000 years ago. The hero is a silly old man who is nearly 90 years old ... (Interviewing the widowed wives of Yugong, Zhigong and Jingcheng respectively) Fourth, the lesson of self-evaluation can reflect some thoughts on my composition teaching. I advocate the combination of reading and writing in composition training. This lesson is an extension of "Yugong Yishan". I also advocate the combination of speaking and writing. This class is a combination of writing and debate. (3) I pay special attention to "writing outside work", and a lot of time is spent in this class. (4) In composition training, special attention should be paid to mobilizing students' internal drive. The first half of this class is actually for this. ⑤ I actively advocate the informationization of Chinese teaching, and so does composition teaching. This lesson uses the "BBS" function of the network to form a "network classroom". If it is conventional means, this effect can't be achieved anyway.