What's the difference between hierarchical society and class society?

First, "distribution according to money" is actually a complex distribution method that integrates the distribution standards of capital, labor, talents, contribution and social demand. It is probably the most reasonable distribution method that human beings can think of. I have discussed this problem in my old book "Two Stages of Human Evolution". \x0d\ Second, the democratic capitalist society strictly implements "separation of power and money". Power can't bring money, money can't buy power, let alone deprive others of their political rights. At most, it can only indirectly affect government decision-making, which is still very limited. I discovered this fact as early as the early 1970s. At that time, I read Glory and Dreams, which said that capitalists hated Roosevelt, but they had no choice but to threaten employees not to vote for him. Rao, Lao Luo was elected four times in a row and became the longest-serving president in American history. Therefore, it is a complete joke to regard the bourgeoisie in a democratic society as the "ruling class". \x0d\ Thirdly, different classes and grades are not static, but in constant flow and change. Yesterday he was a capitalist, today he may go bankrupt and jump into Huangpu; Bill, yesterday's poor people may become tycoons today? Gates is the most extreme example. In a society where Feuerbach is strictly practiced, opportunities are open to the public. This is completely different from a hierarchical society. Of course, it is by no means a perfect society, but I really can't think of a more morally reasonable and feasible society. \x0d\ To sum up, moving from a hierarchical society to a class society is actually a great progress in human history, which provides a realistic way to approach the ideal state of "formal equality" in a dynamic way.