What is Iron Man? Upon closer inspection, the above-mentioned psychological clue of "shaking in front of gods and aliens" appears to have a strange deviation from the main point. One of the main the

What is Iron Man? Upon closer inspection, the above-mentioned psychological clue of "shaking in front of gods and aliens" appears to have a strange deviation from the main point. One of the main themes of Iron Man is indeed Tony Stark's self-doubt, but what he doubts is always his own moral value and whether his actions are correct. He has always been completely confident in his technical abilities. He has never doubted that he could not create something more powerful, and he has never been afraid that he cannot surpass humans or even gods. What Tony Stark really fears is that he is bound by the armor, that the armor is worth more than himself, that he cannot be a good person, and that his technology is abused by others. Similarly, another theme of Iron Man is indeed the tangled and complicated relationship between Tony Stark and the armor, but the tangle and complexity are not just about his dependence on the armor. He and the armor are actually two sides of the same coin: Iron Man's armor symbolizes the transcendence of his fragile human self, the transcendence of his merchant of death, his self as a superhero, and the transcendence of Tony Stark himself. But on the other hand, Iron Man's identity and the armor itself isolate him from others. The armor and Iron Man are what he uses to protect himself, but they also make him a man in the shell, an isolated person imprisoned by the armor. Tony Stark and Iron Man have always been fighting each other, reconciling with each other, integrating with each other, and spiraling towards the next stage. But this movie completely separates Tony Stark from the armor - the armor is regarded as a simple external tool and a psychological state that can be liberated. Making armor is a fearful pathology and a certain... "You can cross the stage of life where you clear everything and start over", or the material for fireworks. At the end of the film, when Tony blows up the armor and throws away the reactor, his attitude is like "I threw away the pacifier and now I'm an adult"; he's simply abandoning his Iron Man identity instead of coming to terms with it. Although he quickly added the declaration "I am Iron Man" at the end of the film, to fans of the original work, this is just to ask Tony Stark to escape from his other half, which is both unreasonable and annoying. At the same time, by "getting rid of the anxiety of desperately building armor," the film also completely deprived Tony of his identity as a creator and innovator, and replaced him with an inexplicable "repairman" position. Please, as a genius, like a flood, sweeping everything and destroying everything, is this the bounden duty of Tony Stark who was born into the world as a futurist and repairman? That's Jarvis' job. I understand that including the trailer fraud, the screenwriters and directors want to break through the stereotypes and dig deeper into the characters. However, in the eyes of fans of the original work, this is a mistake in the direction that makes us feel extremely painful - wanting to break through the stereotypes. , just subvert the foundation of the world view of the original work and make it a joke; if you want to dig deeper into the characters, you will find RDJ instead of Tony Stark. This movie is as exciting as it is exciting, but in the end it has become RDJ and Black's movie, no longer an Iron Man movie. This is the source of the review I wrote: /forum.php?mod=viewthreadamp;tid=46.