Joke Collection Website - Cold jokes - High score in soft test, advice from people who have been there!

High score in soft test, advice from people who have been there!

A master's experience, if you can finish reading it, will definitely help you.

Soft test, the road to success for system analysts —— Experiences of many candidates

The soft test has gone through more than ten years in China. Today, millions of candidates take the soft exam. System analyst, one of the highest levels in soft test, has always been the ultimate goal of many candidates because of its high technical specifications and small number of people passing. It can be said that "so many points have attracted countless candidates to compete." Next, let's take a look at some stories and experiences of netizens such as ABCD 1688 who successfully passed the system analyst exam in the second half of 2005.

(1) "Summing up a teacher's experience, dare not say it's experience" was created by the netizen "ABCD 1688" on February 29th, 2005. This paper introduces the experience of ABCD 1688 from despising the soft exam (original: I despise our national exam) to successfully passing the system analyst, which provides some valuable experience for everyone and is worth learning.

The experience of netizen ABCD 1688:

I was a little disdainful of our national examination, so I didn't take it after I graduated in 1996 (I took an examination of a night university in 1997, wanted to take a double degree, and then went to Kaobo. After a year, I felt bored, so I went to Beijing and couldn't go to school. )

I turned out to be a helper. I don't get along well in the company, and I don't want to go up from the intermediate level bit by bit, so I checked online in June 2005:

There is such a good thing in the bureau that you can evaluate senior engineers after passing the exam once. I want to take the exam.

Before signing up, I looked up a lot of things on the Internet, downloaded a lot of things, and felt that I understood. The goal at that time was to pass it three times. Because many optimistic people have taken the exam many times, the first time is always too proud (sorry, don't hit me), so I want to take the exam first in the first year, then take the CSAI training exam for the second time, and then see the situation for the third time.

Sign up at the end of June and then go to buy books. Zhang Yousheng's book, * * * bought:

Technical Guide for Systems Analysts (2004 Edition), 39 yuan.

Common Tools for System Analysts (2004 Edition), 22 yuan.

System Analysis and Design Technology (2005 edition), 39 yuan.

System Analyst Examination Counseling (2005 Edition), 38 yuan.

Tutorial for System Analysts (2004 Edition), 67 yuan.

***5 books. I want to buy basic knowledge two months before the exam, but I won't have it then. So I only read these five books before the exam.

Because I haven't had an exam for a long time, my memory and ability to learn systematically are really failing. I saw it once, and sometimes I don't even have a concept. Fortunately, I still pay great attention to learning. Add my resume here. I graduated from 1996, majoring in instruments and meters of electronic engineering. The school is a second-class undergraduate. But my study is ok. I worked as a single chip microcomputer system for three years after graduation. In the second year, the company received a lot of computer monitoring equipment, so I made it with VB, which was not bad. Before, my C and C++ were ok, and so was the assembly of single chip microcomputer.

After finishing that project, I accidentally talked to a girl. I couldn't stand the company's monthly 420 yuan and left. First, I worked on C96 for two months, and my salary was low (1200). Then I jumped to 3500 and started to use VB as pure software and MIS. Then I jumped twice, and the working time reached 6000. During the entrepreneurial fiasco! It is difficult to start a business, especially in small and medium-sized cities with irregular management! As a result, the salary in this unit is ok, which is not bad in this city.

I mainly started to do software work in this unit, which is ok.

These years, I am a person who pays great attention to learning. Sure, I'll learn and use it. I worked as a project manager in the early stage, engaged in software engineering and system analysis, and later became a technical prime minister, which further deepened my understanding and application of soft workers. I know a little about Microsoft technology, especially WindowsDNA/COM. The English in the exam this morning was just what I wanted, and I got 7 points. If my English is better, I can understand everything. During this period, ROSE, Projext, Visio, PowerDesigner, ERWin and other tools are all useful, some of them are familiar, but far from proficient.

Because there is a small family, it is not easy to arrange reading time, which is a common problem for people in the workplace. The five books I bought were read in tutorials 1/3. I didn't read the common tools, but I basically read the other three books. By mid-June, 10, I had done what I did in the first half of 2005, and I basically didn't understand mathematics in basic knowledge. I can't do many other things. I finally got a score of 3 1, which was stupid. Later, I only read the exam guidance, which was very relaxing, with the purpose of reading only the test paper this time.

I haven't reviewed for a long time. I have a lot of odds and ends, which means I watched it at home for four days at eleven o'clock. Everything else is in the evening for a while.

I was not nervous at all during the exam. I am still very happy after the exam in the morning. It doesn't feel as difficult as it used to be. Of course, when I checked the questions with my classmates, I found that it should be right to think about a few questions a little. Hand in the papers half an hour in advance in the morning. When I finish, I don't want to check them. I just found a piece of paper and wrote down my answers.

I feel particularly uncomfortable in the afternoon. Later, I posted a post on CASI, cursing the pervert who made me write so many words. I didn't expect to get 52 points in the exam, but I always thought this sentence might be too loose.

The paper is progressing smoothly. I usually write a lot. When I was in Beijing, a boss once praised me: everything can be well documented. So just write more at ordinary times. The paper was handed in 15 minutes in advance, which felt good and a little deep. I thought I could get more than 55 points, but I got a 48-centimeter test, which felt a little bit. . . . . .

What can be said in the exam is: First, I am not nervous. I just took the exam with the mentality of reading the paper, and I was not nervous at all. So I want to tell you that everything can't be forced, and participation may not be rewarded. If you have a broader mind, you may play better.

Second, because I am familiar with hardware, the questions I do are mostly related to hardware (I am lucky: in case the reviewers don't understand hardware, they will be fooled, hehe. . . )。 In the afternoon, I chose the real-time one, and I wrote the last redundant one. I don't know if it's a fluke this time or if it's really okay.

Talk more about Monday afternoon. The first question took 45 minutes, and when I went on, I was very anxious and dissatisfied with my answer. Now I think the score may be:

The answer to the first question is roughly correct, and it is estimated to be around 20 points. The second question is about the coordination between Shanghai and Chongqing. I guess the answer is less, but it should be to the point, so it can also be around 18. You can't answer the third question. The first question said some cliches (the benefits of embedded systems and so on. After the second question and the answer, when you read the third question, you think the answer to the second question is appropriate. As a result, you rarely copy the second question to the third question, but you haven't finished it. The teacher asked you to hand in your papers, and you have to draw a full stop. On second thought, I probably got 10.

So:

In the morning exam, my knowledge is not necessarily comprehensive. I lost almost all my math scores, but I got 47 points in the exam. Although the review is not sufficient, but usually pay attention to learning and accumulation, there are still some new concepts During the exam, analyze the meaning of the questions and find those with simple answers. Don't try to complicate them. The problem itself is not too difficult.

At one o'clock in the afternoon, pay attention to review and summarize two books, Technical Guidance and Department Analysis and Design Technology. The answer should be simple and important, and attention should be paid when using it: it is recommended to read through and set the topic within 10 minutes, and then write. The first question takes 25 minutes at most, and the rest of the time is best divided equally with the other two questions. The time for examination counseling is not very good, personally.

Take a look at your usual writing style during the exam and write more. I think it's better to summarize before the exam. I summarized the software engineering before the exam. I manage outsourcing and have a lot of feelings. I wanted to write cold outsourcing, but I didn't have four papers. I'm here to tell you. Don't panic if the paper doesn't fit. The exam guide says that you can choose a familiar field in this situation and then put the summary on it. Exactly. I just finished a project recently, using 485 bus, and the real-time performance is very poor. In addition, after reading and writing the local PLC and MCU subsystem, the refresh was extremely slow, and later I changed the program structure to get better. So I decided to write the last article. A little shameless, in order to deepen the technical level, I changed 485 to CAN bus, and I added some configuration software to the software (adding oil and vinegar). Finally, I remembered that it is best to have pictures for exam counseling, so I drew a summary composition of this project (power station project) at the end, which felt very cool. In fact, it's good to handle embellishment well, and it's easy to handle it well. Just be careful when writing:).

After the exam, I got the answer to the morning question online. I only got 43 points except the uncertain questions 4 and 5. In addition, I was desperate in the afternoon and felt that I had no chance, but I got more than 40 points in the morning and the paper felt ok. I regard it as a victory, and the original goal can exceed 30 points (I told my wife that it was more than 25 points). Some time ago, I spent more than RMB 100 and asked my friend to buy it from Beijing:

A professional English,

Basic knowledge of mathematics and economic management (edited by Zhang Yousheng) and

Explain Zhang Yousheng's analysis and design case in detail (to strengthen efforts to deal with Monday afternoon).

* * * 100 yuan, indicating that I have never had an idea.

These books are useless now. Whoever can give me a suitable price will transfer these eight books:). If the price is not suitable, I think we should study it. These books are widely read and have high collection value.

Finally, I want to tell you: don't believe the so-called experiences introduced by some people (including me, like CSAI). Most of these experiences are passed at one time. When I wrote it, I passed XX, XX, XX. I feel very proud (maybe I have the capital), and I also want to emphasize how difficult this exam is. Some people also say something: review the scores of one day or something. As I said before, I have less time to review, but I still have some time to review. At least I have finished reading four books. But this time I passed, and I feel very lucky. Although I passed it once, I don't think there is anything to be proud of. I am very happy, but it is true. Registration in Jiangsu this year requires 177 yuan.

Passing doesn't necessarily mean high level. I used to work with a university teacher. He is younger than me, and he is very capable. He must be above me. He was only given too little time, so he took the exam four times. It's a pity that he passed the other two doors at 44 this morning. It's really a pity. I sincerely hope that he can pass next time. In fact, as long as he has a little time to study, I think once is definitely a high score. So don't look at it once or twice, maybe they are all as lucky as me, maybe some are even luckier than me:)

It's a bit difficult to try, but it's not unattainable. No matter how much it affects my future, it is always right to promote my study through exams. I feel that I have learned a lot during this time.

Everyone's situation is different, so what I said may not be suitable for you. If it doesn't work, don't scold me. It's not my fault to write so long, and it's not your fault that the situation is not suitable for you. Just kidding:)

I am really angry. Just throw some bricks at me. Don't attack me personally. It is easy to get angry, which is not good for your health. Besides, I am open-minded, and attacking me is of little help. :)

Mention my scores: 47, 52, 48. Not high, very reluctant, right!

2) My Department is divided into twelve years, which was created by the netizen "Flitter" on February 30th, 2005. ABCD 1688 was born in 1973. Since 1980s, I have come into contact with and liked computers and networks, and I can be said to be a witness of IT development in China. 1993, ABCD 1688 recognized the soft exam for the first time and passed the programmer exam ... In the second half of 2005, he finally passed the system analyst exam. This paper describes the road of soft test in ABCD 1688 12. This "perseverance" spirit deserves our admiration and study.

User FLITTER's experience:

Actually, I began to like computers a long time ago. I used APPLE II, Zijin and a Japanese computer in the 1980s. At that time, the operating systems were CP/M and DOS (completely different from DOS later, the directory command was not dir but catalog).

My high school focuses on a province in Anhui, but this is fate. I did badly in the 9 1 college entrance examination. I studied electronics, not my favorite computer major. 1993, when I was a sophomore, a classmate in the same department told me that there was a computer software qualification examination, so I began to learn books on computers. I passed the programmer's exam that year. At that time, it was absolutely difficult for programmers to test papers, and the scope was very wide. I think there were dozens of programmers in Anhui Province in 1993. At that time, four people from the same department of our college took the exam, three people were admitted, and no one from other key universities in Anhui Province was on the list.

This is the first year of our department. At that time, the examination policy was that those who had no work experience could take the grade examination, and the score of the grade examination was higher than the qualification score. Those who passed the grade examination could get the grade certificate and qualification certificate, and those who passed the grade examination could also.

Take two certificates. 1994, I got two certificates. Theoretically, I am an assistant engineer and didn't graduate.

1994, I graduated to work in a bank in a city in Guangdong. Although I had a certificate, I was not hired. According to common sense, college graduates can only be employed as assistant engineers after one year's internship and two years' internship. I was hired in 1996 because I had a qualification certificate.

I just joined the work in 1994, and I began to want to improve my education in 1995. Because there is no self-study exam for computer undergraduate, the undergraduate who wants to take the accounting exam has to start from the junior college. I took two exams to find the existing adult college entrance examination and was admitted to the computer undergraduate course of South China University of Technology. Running between two cities for on-the-job study. Working in a bank, 1995 passed the junior economist exam.

1996 I didn't take the college entrance examination.

In 1997, he was admitted as an economist and took the second place in the city. But he didn't give me a certificate. Said I didn't meet the registration requirements. When I signed up, I signed up according to a regulation that "technical secondary school students can apply for economist after obtaining assistant qualification for 4 years". I got an assistant engineer in 1993 and 1997.

Four years, when I was a junior college student. However, the soft exam policy in 1997 was that I couldn't get the qualification certificate to take the grade exam, and the issuing personnel might not understand the soft exam policy in 1993, saying that I was still a student in 1993 and couldn't get the qualification certificate.

In 1998, I graduated as an on-the-job undergraduate and began to prepare for the postgraduate entrance examination. June 5438+1999 10 failed to take the postgraduate entrance examination, and 1999 passed the first English Grade B examination. In those years, I only passed or failed, and the certificate was just a piece of paper without even a photo. Compared with now, it is strange.

1in the second half of 1999, the preparation for the soft exam was reformed (multimedia, database, etc. ), but later the reform failed and the exam was cancelled. I changed it in the first half of 2000. I don't know. I missed the registration.

In the second half of 2000, I took the economist exam (I was qualified at this time). I gave up the promotion class because the economist exam overlapped with the promotion class of that year. That year, I passed The Economist with high marks. I remember that I got 58 points higher than the score in two courses.

200 1, I passed the exam for improving classes at 60,61. The funny thing is that the name of the exam at that time was system designer, and outsiders seemed to be at the same level as system analysts. Can the certificate be issued or called a senior programmer (engineer)? I took two more certificates that year, but it took me a long time to get the grade certificate, and I wrote my place of origin wrong. I took the exam in Guangdong, so I wrote my birthplace in Guangdong.

In 200 1 year, I carried out a large-scale network transformation. At the end of February, I passed 640-509 with a score of 967, which was the CCNA (Qualified Line 849) at that time.

From the beginning of 2002 to April of 1, I passed more than 900 CCNP exams.

In order to save money, I got the most difficult grades in 640-509, routing 936, switching 925 and remote access 928. At that time, the qualified line was 708,765,438+07,686, and my score in 640-506 was 965, and the qualified line at that time was 692).

In mid-April, 2002, I suddenly learned that on June 1 day, I got the first master's degree in software engineering in China, and I was admitted to Guangdong University of Technology. I began to travel between the two cities for work again. Later, due to my excellent grades, I published many papers, and the school specially approved me to participate in the defense for two years, which passed smoothly (saving one year) and graduated in June 2004.

In 2004, the soft exam policy was changed to issue department qualification certificates, because I failed to pass the graduation thesis in the first half of the year. In the second half of the year, I got 44,48,465,438+0 for the first time. The second score in the first half of 2005 was 44, 44 and 45.

In May 2005, I got 90 points in the Grade A examination of English science and engineering ... At this time, the policy was changed to professional title English, with no validity period, no certificates, only transcripts. Of course, this report card is very similar to the certificate.

12 years, I finally passed +0 1 with a score of 53,47,49 in June 2005.

With so many exams, I think the advantage of CCNA and CCNP exams in the United States is that you can make an appointment and know the results immediately after the exam. The exam is very practical (at that time, our bank was basically used for large-scale network transformation). And the fractional line is not fixed.

But the price is too expensive, a 100 yuan, ***500 yuan. Then make a fortune by intermediary.

(3) "I finally look forward to the result! There is something to say ",created by netizen" Lights dim "on February 30, 2005. After each exam, the announcement of the results has become the focus of every candidate's attention. After the results were announced, there was a scene of "a happy family and a worried family" in Hisai.com community. I don't study computer, but I passed the system analyst exam in the second half of 2005. What's the secret in the meantime? Let's see how dim the lights are. ...

The experience of dimly lit netizens:

I'm from Guangdong, and I finally got results! Pass smoothly. 50/55/48。 I called yesterday to urge my grades, but I didn't expect to finally get them today.

I am not from a computer background, but I have been engaged in computers for many years. Perhaps non-computer majors have a stronger desire to take the exam. I took the senior programmer exam on 200 1, and I was lucky to take the exam once (62/56). Later, I tried to take the department scores many times, but I didn't have much time to prepare for work, and the passing rate was very low every year, which made me a little scared. Last year's semi-annual report, I didn't take the exam because I didn't have time to prepare. In the second half of this year, I finally made up my mind to take the exam anyway. I spent half a month preparing for the exam and will take it again next year. I have the right to receive training this time. I didn't expect to be lucky, just once.

Let's talk about experience, hoping to help later generations. I also learned a lot from this website, even if it is a reward!

Let me talk about the books I have read: technical guide for system analysts, system analysis and design technology, examination guidance for system analysts, tutorial for system analysts, and analysis of test questions from 1999 to 200 1.

First of all, I want to emphasize that the system analyst exam counseling is very helpful to me, and I think it is necessary. I may have spent half my time on this book. It covers almost all the morning questions with knowledge points in the past five or six years, and plays a very important role in preparing for the morning exam, especially for people like me who don't have much time to prepare. Of course, in order to prepare for the exam in the morning, I also read books on discrete mathematics (which I haven't studied) and database principles (the database paradigm makes me dizzy). But the title of this book is really pleasing, and there are many mistakes. I hardly watch it. I hope the next version can be modified.

By the way, I didn't know that dr. zhang had also published a book on the basics of mathematics and economic management and detailed answers to analysis and design cases. I'm sorry

The two books "Technical Guide for System Analysts" and "System Analysis and Design Technology" are helpful for the exam in the afternoon, but one of them is written according to the department outline (I forget which one), which is relatively general and doesn't feel meaningful. I didn't read the system analyst tutorial basically, mainly because I didn't have time, and I felt too extensive and not deep enough. It's a pity that I haven't seen the detailed solution to the analysis and design case. It is estimated that this book will be very helpful in the afternoon. After reading these books, I still feel uncertain in the afternoon. It depends entirely on the usual accumulation and luck.

I don't think there is a particularly good way to prepare papers in the afternoon. Learning from the experience of predecessors means writing more. You must write a few articles before the exam (at least like me) to feel the pressure of words and time. I don't have any pressure on the examination paper, because I have read the examination questions for nearly five years, and there are topics I can write every year. For those who have never done a project, they can only read other people's articles, think more and summarize more. I think it is very important to emphasize the ability to analyze and solve problems, rather than generalize, which is mentioned in the System Analyst Examination Guide. How else can others check your level through this article? I spent more than half of my time on topics and solutions in this paper exam, so I felt that my paper score would be higher, but I didn't expect it to be only 48, hehe.

Judging from the scores of netizens, I feel that most of them are planted in the morning. So I think the topic in the morning should be the most difficult to prepare. It is too wide. It is not enough to look at the examination guidance of system analysts. For the technical details that are not well mastered, you also need to read the corresponding teaching materials. This can only vary from person to person. It should be okay to spend more time preparing. By preparing the topic in the morning, you can also broaden your knowledge.

A lot of details, I hope to help future candidates. I would also like to thank my predecessors for their guidance and Dr. Zhang for his good book.

(d) June 65438+February 3, 20051,"Communication Department, Talking about Process" created by netizen "NK Tianci". This article was issued by the Ministry of Information Industry: the unit must pass the title evaluation ... which makes us very depressed. I didn't expect so many exams after work. First of all, the author introduces the process of successfully passing the system analyst exam at one time.

User NKTIANCI's experience:

The Ministry of Information Industry issued a document: the unit must pass the title evaluation, which really makes us depressed. I didn't expect so many exams after work.

I never think this exam is very useful, what is in the textbook, cough.

In 2004, I was forced to report to the programmer, 62/36, but failed. This is a shame. It was a feeling at that time. Fortunately, I said later that beginners don't have to take the exam, so don't worry.

In 2005, I reported to the database system engineer, and my work has been very busy. Although I only do test questions these years, I have been engaged in first-line development. I feel no problem passing, and my grades are good, 54/52.

Considering the wide range of sub-examinations in the department, I intend to strike while the iron is hot and submit the report in 2005. 10 began to prepare, and before that, I had to take exam notes (I have been preparing for more than a week, hehe, the score is the same as last year, and I failed and didn't report my hope). After a brief look at the department tutorial, I found nothing specific, just some theoretical and process things. I found the test questions and some materials from the Internet (mainly Greek CSAI and old urchin, thank you here), and then I went to the examination room. After the exam, I thought it was ok, but I didn't have much planning when writing my thesis, and the structure was a bit messy. After reading it, I found that there was still more than half an hour. Cough.

Materials used: a course of systems analyst, 1995-2005 examination questions, paper examples, borrowed discrete mathematics, data structures, online books, etc.

I read the test questions in detail, read some textbooks in general, and got to know the general structure of the paper, so I don't have time to worry about anything else.

After almost 10, I have to read the test questions for a while every night. I think it is very important to do the questions before the exam, so that we can find the missing and fill in the blank, and it is easier to know the key points of the exam. As long as it is an exam, it has certain limitations and can be prepared by opportunism.

Fortunately, after 46/54/45, the process was hard and the result was satisfactory, especially on the 24th birthday of Gregorian calendar. It finally snowed in Beijing today. I was born in a snowy day and got a good news before it snowed.