Because old Rong Zhi's case is long and the evidence is hard to find, can she be too smart to forget it?

There is absolutely no way to get away with it. If it is really "a long time and the evidence is hard to find", then old Rong Zhi will not be sentenced to death in the first instance; Since being sentenced to death, the judiciary must have conclusive evidence. Personally, I think there is a great possibility of immediate execution of the death penalty in the second instance, and there is almost no possibility of changing the sentence. The reasons are as follows:

1. What role did Fa Ying play in the criminal behavior when old Rong Zhi was arrested? He has already told the whole story of the escape of old Rong Zhi and Faziying, which had a great influence at that time and was also one of the key cases investigated by the public security organs. This case happened more than 20 years ago and was followed by public security personnel for 20 years. They visited, investigated, asked and obtained evidence, and no work was left behind.

In addition, Fa Ying was arrested at 1999, and the criminal facts about old Rong Zhi have long been clear. It is human nature that Fa Ying will definitely tell the whole story about the role played by old Rong Zhi in various cases. You know, confessions can also be used as evidence, and they can also be mutually confirmed with the evidence held by the police.

So "a long time" means "it is difficult to find evidence"? On the contrary, in the process of investigation and pursuit for more than 20 years, the evidence was fixed step by step.

We onlookers all have the idea that it is difficult to find evidence for a long time, and so does old Rong Zhi, which is why she has always argued that "she was forced to do the case under duress". But in the face of evidence, all sophistry is in vain.

Second, without sufficient evidence, it is impossible to impose the death penalty immediately. In China, the death penalty is the most severe punishment, so it is also called "capital punishment". It is precisely because of this that the death sentence is very cautious and serious, especially in the current judicial background of advocating "killing less and killing carefully". Based on this, if there is no conclusive evidence, even if there are doubts that do not constitute the death penalty, it will certainly not be sentenced to death or quit the investigation to continue the investigation.

The reason why the death sentence can be made in the first instance is that the evidence can absolutely withstand scrutiny. After all, the scope of the case is extremely wide, and countless pairs of eyes are staring. Is it a joke?

Third, the Nanchang Intermediate People's Court made a death sentence, but whether the death sentence needs to be reviewed by the High Court is based on the principle of prudence and seriousness, but the death sentences made by lower courts are ultimately reviewed by the Supreme Court. One of the most important tasks of the Supreme Court's review is to find out whether the facts of the crime are clear, whether the evidence is true and sufficient, and whether the procedure is legal. Any doubt will correct the previous death sentence and make it invalid.

The Supreme People's Court participated in the review, and there was no news that the Supreme People's Court had any improprieties or doubts in the evidence and process. What factors will lead to the change of judgment in the second instance? Rarely, "evidence" and "process" are excluded unless you are pregnant.

To sum up, no matter how bad a felon is, when faced with the immediate execution of the death penalty, it will also be a "trapped beast still fighting", and so will old Rong Zhi. Her second-instance defense or appeal is more like procrastination.

To say the least, even if she was forced to commit a crime because of threats and coercion, as she said, why didn't she take the initiative to surrender after 1999' s execution? Instead, choose the road to escape for 20 years? Is the "inescapable opportunity" still true? Ask her to show evidence of coercion and threats.