Yan is sick-classic prose

Hades is ill _ classic prose This is a story of doing something wrong because of subjective, dogmatic and formal "investigation"-

Rebecca was ill, so he sent a child to the city to see a doctor. When he left, Rebecca's grandmother told the child earnestly, "Please pay attention, please invite the best doctor." The kid is puzzled: "It's the first time I went back to the city to ask for a doctor, and there are so many doctors. Signs are hung in every household, which read' Drive away the disease by hand' and' Bring it back to life'. How do I know which doctor is the best? " Grandma Yan said, "There is a way to know which doctor is the best." The child said, "What method?" Grandma Yan said, "No matter which gentleman dies, there is a ghost of a dead man standing at the door. When you arrive at the doctor's door in the city, you just need to count carefully, which door has the most ghosts, and which gentleman has the most ghosts. Which door has the least ghosts, which gentleman must be the most powerful. "

When the little devil came to this city, he walked to the door of a gentleman. According to grandma Yan, she saw a ghost standing in the dark. I went to a gentleman's door again and saw a ghost standing in the dark. Then I went to a gentleman's door. When I saw it, I was scared. There are more dark ghosts. No matter which gentleman's door, there are many ghosts standing. The child thought, "What should I do?" Finally, good. I finally ran to the door of a gentleman's house and saw only a ghost standing there alone. The child said to himself, "I finally found a good gentleman."

When the imp invited the gentleman back, Grandma Yan greeted the boss and asked quietly, "How many ghosts are there in front of this gentleman's house?" The kid said, "No matter which gentleman's door is haunted in the whole city, there is only one ghost in this gentleman's door, so I invited him."

Grandma Yan told the devil what the child said. The terrifying thought that the little devil had invited the best gentleman in the city to see him was very happy. Mr. Wang took the opportunity to have a chat with Mr. Wang after taking a prescription.

The terrifying said, "As far as I know, Mr. Wang's medical skill is really the first in the city."

The gentleman said, "Your majesty's praise is not small."

The terrible prince said, "Since you are so good at medicine, you must have been practicing medicine among the people for many years, right?"

In front of the terrible prince, Mr. Wang dared not lie, so he had to answer truthfully: "No, I started business the day before yesterday."

Wei Wei also thinks that Mr. Wang misunderstood his words. Ask again: "I mean, how many years have you been treating people?"

Mr. Wang said, "I started my business naively."

The terrifying said, "Really?"

The gentleman said, "I dare not lie in front of your majesty."

The horrible man was surprised: "How many people have you treated?"

Mr. Wang said, "It was opened the day before yesterday, and I only saw one yesterday."

The terrifying said, "How did you see it?"

Mr. Said; "It's unfortunate. Play dead. "

Terrified: "You can't blame the kid for saying that there is only one ghost at your door. It turned out to be such a thing. "

The joke "Death is ill" was told by my grandfather next door in the summer when I was a child. The content of the joke is very funny and humorous, so I remember it clearly.

People are ill, and everyone is willing to invite a good doctor to see them. But whether a doctor is good or bad, and whether his medical skills are brilliant or not, mainly depends on his medical literacy, knowledge and accumulated clinical experience for many years. It is not determined by how many patients the doctor treated died.

According to common sense, the more skilled doctors are, the more old doctors who have been practicing medicine for many years, and the more patients they see. He didn't like it after reading it, and the more patients died, the more. However, there are many reasons for the death of patients, and the situation is extremely complicated. Some may have incurable diseases, and some may not be serious at first, because there is no timely treatment, and the condition is delayed and cannot be cured ... So how can we absolutely judge the doctor's medical skills just by how many patients have died?

Of course, there are cases where the patient could have been cured, but unfortunately he was executed because the doctor prescribed the wrong medicine and failed to prescribe the right medicine. But this can only be one of the reasons for the patient's death. It would be unscientific to grasp this point in isolation and say that many doctors who deal with patients have died and doctors' medical skills are not good.

This short story illustrates this truth: Rebecca was ill, and this boy followed the instructions of Grandma Rebecca, went to the city and invited the most ghost doctor to stand at the door. According to grandma Yan's logic, there is no doubt that this should be the best doctor, right? But on the contrary, the worst doctor in the city was invited.

Subjectivists and formalists often do. They look at the problem incompletely, subjectively and unilaterally, and pursue form. They only see the surface, but not the essence. They can't see that when they see this, and they don't relax. Grandma Yan made this mistake. She only heard that doctors see doctors. Every time someone dies, ghosts stand at his door. She thinks all doctors with many ghosts at the door are bad people. I don't care about the doctor's actual skill.

Therefore, when she told the kid to go to town for a doctor, she didn't teach him how to go deep into the masses and find a good doctor with rich medical knowledge and rich clinical experience through investigation, but suggested to him to find a doctor standing at the door with few ghosts. In this way, how can it not be ridiculous and stupid!

Whenever I think of grandma Yan and the imp in this story, I always think their images are ridiculous. In fact, in our daily work, there are also people who engage in research subjectively, dogmatically and formally.