Ask for idioms and common sayings about speaking and speaking skills.

First, take advantage of the situation to refute the enemy's theory

Once, a local official of the Kuomintang banned male and female students from swimming together in public baths, which caused a storm in the whole city. In order to refute this practice, Mr. Lu Xun said humorously: "Students swim together and occasionally touch each other, which hinders men and women. But after the ban, men and women still live together in the middle of heaven and earth, breathing the air between heaven and earth together. Air exhaled from this man's nostril, inhaled by that woman's nostril, exhaled from that woman's nostril, inhaled by another man's nostril, which is worse than a flesh-and-blood collision. To draw a clear line completely, let's not order all men, women and children of all colors to wear gas masks, which will not only prohibit air circulation, but also hinder publicity. So everyone is ... here! Hey! " Lu Xun said, and stood up to simulate walking with a gas mask. The audience laughed their heads off.

Here, Lu Xun did not directly refute the views of local officials of the Kuomintang, but corrected his words conveniently-since you forbid male and female students to swim together, let everyone wear gas masks! In this way, the absurdity of the views held by local officials of the Kuomintang is magnified, and the audience naturally understands the absurdity and irrationality of the views held by local officials of the Kuomintang.

Second, playing dumb and being sarcastic.

During the period of War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression, the famous writer Nie Gannu lived in Guilin. Once, Nie Gannu and his friends asked for a drink in a restaurant. The waiter brought the whole chicken for nothing, but there were more bones than meat. Nie Gannu asked, "Are these two chickens?"

The waiter replied, "No, only one."

Nie Gannu primly said, "How can a chicken have so many bones?"

Hearing this, the waiter suddenly looked ashamed.

Nie Gannu, who knew it was a chicken, pretended to be two chickens-in this way, he induced the waiter to say "there is only one chicken". Then, according to the waiter's words, Nie Gannu naturally said that "a chicken can't have so many bones". This way of speaking in a daze has a tortuous and ironic expression effect, and the waiter naturally looks ashamed after listening.

Third, the use of Peng's bad habits for analogy

Tie Ning, vice chairman of the Chinese Writers Association, chairman of the Hebei Writers Association and a famous female writer, once had a quip at the seminar on the development of literature in Cangzhou, Hebei Province: "Once I was on a business trip, I saw a small rice shop next to a country road, and two old people were sitting on a small bench eating cold rice noodles. However, an eye-catching and loud signboard-"Hilton Hotel" hangs on the dilapidated door frame of the restaurant ... This phenomenon appears from time to time in the current literary world. This is an era when people are particularly afraid that they are not profound. Nowadays, many people who engage in literature and art are particularly afraid of being called' artisans' rather than' homes', so they deliberately create the phenomenon of' Hilton Hotel'. "

The contrast between small restaurants and Hilton Hotel is huge, which is easy to be perceived and understood by people. Therefore, Tie Ning used the signboard of "Hilton Hotel" hanging in the canteen to compare and criticize the bad habits of literary creators who have no literary attainments, deliberately hyped up and put gold and "home" on their faces. Her vivid metaphor is helpful for the audience to understand and understand the phenomenon that some literary writers value names over reality, and their names are seriously inconsistent with reality.

Fourth, the complaint is free of punishment

1in the summer of 996, Zhao Shuli, who was in Taiyuan at that time, was criticized under the scorching sun. The rebel side asked, "Zhao Shuli, what kind of cadre are you?" Thinking that the cadres at that time were divided into four categories: good, relatively good, guilty and unrepentant, Zhao Shuli said with a smile: "I am a first-and second-class cadre, I dare not squeeze in;" Call me a third-class cadre, but you don't admit it. If it really doesn't work, even if I am third and a half. " This "three and a half" export immediately amused the "gangsters" who accompanied him, but they dared not make any noise, so they had to cover their mouths and bend their backs lower; Hearing this, the rebels were dumbfounded.

At that time, Zhao Shuli was faced with "four difficult choices": if he was a first-class or second-class cadre, he would be accused by the rebels of "attempting to infiltrate the ranks of proletarian cadres", which would lead to heavier charges; If we are three types of cadres, we will not be recognized by the rebels; And if you admit that you are a "unrepentant" four types of cadres, it will obviously give the rebels an excuse to escalate their criticism. In this case, Zhao Shuli cleverly said a word, describing himself as a "three-and-a-half-class cadre" (meaning "a cadre who has made mistakes and may change"). His words made the rebels who deliberately added crimes to him have no chance, which was tactful and appropriate.

Fifth, set traps for the truth.

Once, La Fontaine, a famous European fable writer, baked a potato. When the potatoes were cooked, he left the room to get down to business. However, when he came back, the potatoes were gone. Once a servant walked into a restaurant, Lafontaine estimated that nine times out of ten he stole the food.

So he shouted, "Ah! My God, who ate the potato I put on the fireplace? "

"Not me." The servant replied.

"That's great."

Why do you say that?

"Because I put a little arsenic on the potato to poison the mouse!"

"Ah, arsenic ... my God-I'm poisoned!"

"Don't worry, son, there is no arsenic on the potatoes-this is the subtotal I know the truth."

In the case of insufficient evidence, it is difficult for Lafontaine to get the servant to admit stealing vegetables if he adopts the usual questioning method. Therefore, La Fontaine tactfully set a trap according to the servant's fear of being poisoned, and induced the servant to admit the act of stealing food with the lie of "poisoning". Compared with direct questioning, this kind of dialogue is obviously much more witty and convenient.

Sixth, throwing sweet potatoes skillfully to answer the problem

1982 In the autumn, at the meeting of Chinese and American writers held in Los Angeles, American poet allen ginsberg asked China writer Jiang Zilong to solve a strange mystery: "Put a chicken weighing 5 kg into a bottle that can only hold 1 kg of water. How to take it out? " Jiang Zilong smiled. "You obviously put the chicken in the bottle with your mouth, so I will take it out again with the tool of language." Ginsburg praised: "You are the first person to guess this strange mystery."

Allen ginsberg's question can't be answered directly, because his strange riddle is an "unsolvable equation", as if it were a hot potato. In this regard, Jiang Zilong adopted a conversation strategy of throwing the mountain fee to the owner-"How do you put it in, I will take it out." This sentence not only has the literal meaning of "I took it out the way you put it in", but also has another implication of "If you can't put it in, I don't need to take it out". In this way, Jiang Zilong not only got rid of possible embarrassment, but also hit back at Ginsburg.

Seven, the use of figures of speech to express personality

When asked about his personality and writing style, Peng Jiuyang, who was criticized by the media as the first beauty writer in China and the first beauty in China Football Lottery, made a quip: "Give me a book and I will make myself cry; Give me a pen and I will make the world cry. "

Because of repetition and antithesis, Peng Jiuyang's ci has only 22 words, but it clearly expresses her impressionable personality and writing ability of her touching works, and at the same time shows strong self-confidence. Her words are concise and easy to remember, rich in connotation and very impressive. No wonder they have become classic quips widely read by literary lovers.

Why can a writer who lives by pen spit lotus flowers? An orator from a writer's background analyzed it like this: "First, the writer formed profound thoughts in the process of creation;" Secondly, the author draws lessons from and absorbs some experience and skills of written expression in oral expression; Thirdly, in complex social activities, the author practices oral English intentionally or unintentionally. "The speaker's analysis is in place, and his words are also very enlightening to readers who are interested in improving their oral expression ability.

Give you a website with what you need ~ ~