According to insiders, Tan Mingming, the perpetrator of Maserati, took the initiative to compensate nearly 5 million. What happened afterwards?

Tan Mingming, the principal offender of Maserati's collision with BMW, has been sentenced to life imprisonment by the court! As for how much Tan Mingming's family compensated the dead and wounded, neither the official nor the relevant parties publicly told the public, and the outside world could not know the details. It can only be said that the compensation from Tan Mingming's family won Tan Mingming a mitigated punishment, which is for sure. For the result of this case, it is the best ending.

?

1. Case review: Maserati hit BMW case 2065438+At about 22 o'clock on July 3, 2009, Tan Mingming, a young woman from yongcheng city, Henan Province, drove a Maserati car and killed two friends in the street. After colliding with many cars on the way, he continued to drive away despite the obstruction of the surrounding people. In the end, the rear-end collision hit a BMW waiting for a traffic light, and the BMW caught fire instantly after being knocked out of a few tens of meters. The accident caused two passengers on the BMW to die on the spot and the driver was seriously injured. After inspection and identification, the speed of the accident vehicle that Tan Mingming was driving at the time of the accident was between 120 and 135. After testing, Tan Mingming's blood alcohol content is 167.66, which belongs to drunk driving.

Second, the court sentenced Tan Mingming to life imprisonment! On June 6, 2020, 165438+ Shangqiu Intermediate People's Court sentenced Tan Mingming, the principal offender of this case, to life imprisonment and deprivation of political rights for life. (Two passengers were given suspended sentences. Shangqiu Intermediate People's Court held that the defendant Tan Mingming knew that drunk driving was illegal and that drunk driving would endanger public safety, but ignored traffic regulations and public safety. After a traffic accident due to drunk driving, continue to drive at high speed in the urban area and escape, resulting in serious consequences and property losses. Its subjective attitude is laissez-faire, with the intention of endangering public safety. In view of the fact that the defendant was in a state of drunkenness at the time of committing the crime and subjectively did not want or actively pursued the occurrence of harmful consequences, it belongs to indirect intentional crime, and its subjective malignancy and personal danger are different from direct intentional crimes that intentionally hit people with cars and intentionally endangered public safety. Tan Mingming can truthfully confess his crimes after arriving at the case, which is a confession and actively compensates the economic losses of the injured party. He shows repentance and can be given a lighter punishment according to law.

?

Third, the "four brothers have the law" view on this case. As soon as the verdict of this case came out, it caused extensive public discussion. Some people think that Tan Mingming should be sentenced to death for causing such serious consequences; Some people think that there is a situation of "spending money to buy punishment" and lament that "it is good to have money"; Some people think this is the best result of this case. Some views on "four brothers have laws"

?

1, the court's decision is legal.

Previously, there have been similar cases in China, and the perpetrators have been sentenced to death. Tan Mingming caused two deaths and one serious injury, but he can also be sentenced to life imprisonment. Will the court misinterpret the law? Article 4 of the Provisions on the Scope of Civil Proceedings Attached to Criminal Matters promulgated by the Supreme People's Court on February 4, 2000 stipulates: "If the defendant compensates the victim for material losses, the people's court may consider it as a sentencing circumstance". This provision provides a legal basis for the application of compensation as a sentencing circumstance in judicial practice. With the continuous improvement of relevant laws and regulations, in judicial practice, in cases involving personal injury such as intentional injury cases and traffic accidents, it has become a common practice for the victim to actively compensate the other party and get a lighter punishment after understanding. The purpose of establishing "criminal reconciliation" system by law is to make the victims of criminal cases get compensation as much as possible, so as to make up for the losses and reduce social contradictions. Reconciliation without reconciliation and understanding without understanding are the rights of victims.

?

2. The life and death contest in this case.

After the case, the public's call for severe punishment of the murderer became louder and louder, and the family members of the deceased also made it clear that they would not accept compensation and demanded that the perpetrators be sentenced to death. The author believes that if there is no BMW driver lying in the intensive care unit in this case, Tan Mingming's life may be really difficult to guarantee. The family conditions of the two deceased were good, and it was psychologically difficult to accept "changing money for life". They are not at ease to get back the compensation, and it is their best idea to put the perpetrators to death. The point is that there is another driver lying in the hospital. It is said that the medical expenses at the trial have already cost more than 4 million, which is unbearable for ordinary families. Tan Mingming's family seized this point, forcing the families of the deceased and the injured to finally choose to forgive Tan Mingming and let Tan Mingming get a light sentence. If Tan Mingming is sentenced to death, her family will not compensate her for a penny, and the court can do nothing. Because the person who bears civil liability for compensation is Tan Mingming, who is an adult and is responsible for her own actions, her family has no obligation to pay compensation. As a little girl in her twenties, where can I get any compensation? So in the end, the families of the deceased took care of the families of the injured, understood Tan Mingming together, and finally reached a compensation agreement. As for the amount of compensation, the outside world does not know the details.

?

3. It may be the best result.

As soon as the case happened, netizens began a moral trial, and the voice demanding severe punishment of the perpetrators was almost one-sided. Although the court will not judge according to public opinion, sometimes public opinion and the effect that the law wants to pursue are the same. I don't know if you have noticed Yulin's "car crash and death". Drunk driving and hitting people, regardless of the masses' obstruction, dragged Tan blocked in front of the car for 900 meters, causing Tan's death and eventually being executed. Wu Huizhong was executed for one death, and Tan Mingming was sentenced to life imprisonment for two deaths and one serious injury, which may be beyond the expectation of most netizens. They think that even if the death penalty is not executed immediately, it should be suspended. It is hard for the public to accept it, and they have to accept it, because they also know that there is another injured person in the hospital who is in urgent need of medical expenses. There are also sighs of "solving with money", "paying for life" and "it's good to have money", some of which violate socialist values. Therefore, the verdict of this case may not achieve understandable social effects, but it is also the best ending for the families of the deceased and the injured.

?

Written at the end: for this case, everyone should also treat it rationally. Rescuing the injured is the first priority, followed by comforting the families of the deceased, and finally deciding how to punish the perpetrators. Do you think so?